Iron Man The Official Iron Man Rate & Review Thread

Rate it

  • 10, Wonderful, Amazing, Rad-Tastic!

  • 9, Really Awesome

  • 8, an Action packed fun movie

  • 7, A good film

  • 6, I liked it

  • 5, Okay

  • 4, Dissapointment

  • 3, Bad

  • 2, Sucked major Iron Balls

  • 1, Hated it! Worst film I've ever seen!

  • 10, Wonderful, Amazing, Rad-Tastic!

  • 9, Really Awesome

  • 8, an Action packed fun movie

  • 7, A good film

  • 6, I liked it

  • 5, Okay

  • 4, Dissapointment

  • 3, Bad

  • 2, Sucked major Iron Balls

  • 1, Hated it! Worst film I've ever seen!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did anyone notice that the photo of young Tony at MIT (in the news reel at the beginning) had him next to "Dummy" (the robot that uses the fire extinguisher in the scenes where Tony tests the boots)? I guess he invented it all the way back then.

Yeah, that was supposedly the first robot he ever made, so it's kind of special to him to this very day...
 
I see your point but my disagreement would be that I think his vulnerability was justified. Think about it, he was a rich playboy that only thought about himself, and this was his first battle with his frist Mark 2 suit, that he was still working the kinks out of. I liked seeing that vulnerability because it made him more realistic. Going from rich playboy to a fighter you are going to be vulnerable no matter how good of gear/weapons you have. Meanwhile Obadiah seemed strong and powerful throughout the entire film so he could compensate for the lake of technology and rival Stark who has the better gear.
Remember horse back Afghans went up against Russions with tanks and were successful (not all the time), so technology doesn't always mean you have the upperhand. Either way in short I think his vulnerability played to the progression of the character of Stark really well.

fair dos...
 
I just saw the movie last night...

It %$@#$%#@^ing ROCKED!!!!! HARD!!!! :word: :word: :word:

For the record, I have never been a big fan of Iron Man, but this movie made me want to sign up on the new series, and there were no parts of the movie that you wished weren't there... it was just made beautifully, and ranks right up there amongst other great super-hero flicks like Spidey 2 & X2...

And the best part is that I hope this is a sign to come from ALL Marvel movies made by Marvel Studios Inc. and that in the spirit of the comics, they can make movies with good continuity between them... I'd love to see and Iron Man/Spider-Man old school Marvel Team-Up style movie (I know I have to wait for Sony's contract with Spider-Man to end... but if the Marvel movies are a success, it will happen), and I now cannot wait for The Incredible Hulk and the long-awaited rumour of a Tony Stark cameo. :up:

And when you stop and think that WB already has this potential with their characters and they just piss it away and waste it just boggles my friggin' mind. :csad:

'Nuff said.

:yay:
 
The CONCEPT was based on Tony's old tech, but he updated it to match the Mk3, exampled by Stane's HUD and on board weaponry, which was pretty beefy without a jericho.
fair dos


I can kind of agree with that, but if you watch him easily handle everything, then where's the drama?
the drama, just like in the film comes from using an older battery with a limited supply of energy.

I would have just preferred to see the majority of his reserved used up performing some large scale repulsor blast rather than with flight, even though it was necessary. it's not about taking out the scenes we had, rather than editing some other parts in to really drain his battery.




It was AN advanced weapon, one of many. It was just a blanket bomber anyway. IMO there was no need to incorporate it everywhere.

The point wasn't that one is more powerful than the other like a DragonballZ style power war SS1 vs SS3/ Mk3 vs Jericho. The Jericho was a macguffin whilst the suit was Tony's empowerment and redemption.

I thought the jericho was supposed to be 'the advanced weapon', which is why the ten rings wanted it considering they had pretty much all his other stuff available.

considering stane's idea of power and weapony came with state of the art stuff, i'm just surprised when that rocket on his arm turned out to not be a jericho since he was modelling the suit to sell rather than personally use. He only got in it when shield were after him.


I can see that, kind of like a mix between Hulk 2003 and Silver Surfer in FF2. But he wasn't just flying for the sake of it, he knew Stane's armour wouldn't take the cold.
true but i thought the business with the reactor was initially going to repower his suit or something.

I do get the plot with the ice but still tony was able to fly out of the ice bucket in his mach 2 suit so i never really felt it was ever going to make a big impact and ended up just eating resources...
 
I just saw the movie last night...

It %$@#$%#@^ing ROCKED!!!!! HARD!!!! :word: :word: :word:

For the record, I have never been a big fan of Iron Man, but this movie made me want to sign up on the new series,

Same here. Not only am i getting the new one, but also all the back issues of the current series.

I got IRON MAN FEVER!!! :hehe:
 
That WAS awesome, although I didn't twig until Stark pointed it out at the bar. Christ I'm slow.

Brilliantly set up. Another notch on the brilliant post for this movie.

Don't be too hard on yourself!
I was pretty stupefied about how amazing this movie was, and I'm sure I missed certain things... But I really did try to soak it all up as much as I could!

I did go in with great expectations, but all the while I still had this sick feeling in my stomach that I'd been sucked into the hype, that I'd seen the best this movie had to offer, and I let a few bad apples worry me with their reviews... But as the movie rolled along, I had a hard time keeping my jaw off the floor...

When this started, and I saw how hard Favreau was working to make this successful, I really was geeked and had a gut feeling that this would be the comic movie we'd been waiting for;

he really cared what the fans had to say, and he knew the importance of not deviating too far from the comics if it wasn't necessary, he's one of the first comic book movie directors to realize that the pool of ideas in the Marvel mythos is vast enough so that you don't need to interject some fresh ideas and go your own direction...

I'm no Iron Man expert, but to me this felt more like a Iron Man movie then Spider-Man felt like a Spidey movie, or that X-Men felt like a X-men movie... Just blown away man... BLOW AWAY :wow:
 
Watched the midnight showing last night. This has got to be one of the better Marvel Films in a while after such dissapointments as Ghost Rider and Fantastic Four. Here's hoping to a kick ass Incredible Hulk and Wolverine!
 
I see your point but my disagreement would be that I think his vulnerability was justified. Think about it, he was a rich playboy that only thought about himself, and this was his first battle with his frist Mark 2 suit, that he was still working the kinks out of. I liked seeing that vulnerability because it made him more realistic. Going from rich playboy to a fighter you are going to be vulnerable no matter how good of gear/weapons you have. Meanwhile Obadiah seemed strong and powerful throughout the entire film so he could compensate for the lake of technology and rival Stark who has the better gear.
Remember horse back Afghans went up against Russions with tanks and were successful (not all the time), so technology doesn't always mean you have the upperhand. Either way in short I think his vulnerability played to the progression of the character of Stark really well.

Don't forget the line where Stane tells Stark "My suit isn't as... conservative as yours."

Stane had only one focus in building his suit- he wanted an offensive weapons system.
Stark had more of a policemans role in mind it seemed; I think he was designing a kind of globe-trotting ultra-high tech riot gear. (at first)

Also, seemed like they tried really hard keep at least one foot grounded in tech and science- which I think was a good decision.
Because the rest of the film made the impossible seem plausible, I think it would have seemed ridiculous to see a suit that is light enough to fly at those speeds remain totally impervious to the impact of 20MM rounds from a Raptor, for example.

Gah, I don't know what I'm saying. I'm just geeking HARD after seeing this movie last night. :grin:

I mean, in my mind- it's Iron Man, Batman Begins, and Spiderman II at the top of the Superhero flick heap.
 
Don't be too hard on yourself!
I was pretty stupefied about how amazing this movie was, and I'm sure I missed certain things... But I really did try to soak it all up as much as I could!

I did go in with great expectations, but all the while I still had this sick feeling in my stomach that I'd been sucked into the hype, that I'd seen the best this movie had to offer, and I let a few bad apples worry me with their reviews... But as the movie rolled along, I had a hard time keeping my jaw off the floor...

When this started, and I saw how hard Favreau was working to make this successful, I really was geeked and had a gut feeling that this would be the comic movie we'd been waiting for;

he really cared what the fans had to say, and he knew the importance of not deviating too far from the comics if it wasn't necessary, he's one of the first comic book movie directors to realize that the pool of ideas in the Marvel mythos is vast enough so that you don't need to interject some fresh ideas and go your own direction...

I'm no Iron Man expert, but to me this felt more like a Iron Man movie then Spider-Man felt like a Spidey movie, or that X-Men felt like a X-men movie... Just blown away man... BLOW AWAY :wow:


Yeah, I wish Favereau would've directed other Marvel movies, like Daredevil and GR; those movies won't have turned out to be such turkeys if he did.
 
Watched the midnight showing last night. This has got to be one of the better Marvel Films in a while after such dissapointments as Ghost Rider and Fantastic Four. Here's hoping to a kick ass Incredible Hulk and Wolverine!

I wish the best for Wolverine, but Fox still has the rights and they can make Wolverine as good as X1 & X2, or as bad as Elektra and FF. :(
 
I'd love to see and Iron Man/Spider-Man old school Marvel Team-Up style movie (I know I have to wait for Sony's contract with Spider-Man to end... but if the Marvel movies are a success, it will happen)

I don't know why Sony would ever let go of a property like Spider-Man. It would be insane. The right to make Spider-Man movies is like a license to print money.
 
Yeah, I wish Favreau would've directed other Marvel movies, like Daredevil and GR; those movies won't have turned out to be such turkeys if he did.

Me too, and even the scenes where he was in Daredevil, I'm sure it is his input that made them shine.
I'm happy with him doing Iron Man, and the prospect of him teaming up to do Avengers.
Thing is, I'm pretty sure directors never really want to be stuck doing the same kind of thing for to long, so I'd doubt he'd jump from a few Iron Man and Avengers movies and then really feel like starting a Daredevil or Ghost Rider franchise, but I think he'd be able to get the dark tone of those movies after seeing the well executed dark scenes from Iron Man.


I don't know why Sony would ever let go of a property like Spider-Man. It would be insane. The right to make Spider-Man movies is like a license to print money.

Can they hold on to the Spider-Man property indefinitely so long as they keep squeezing out sequels??? :csad:
 
As this century started, who would have thought that a comic book film would be the best movie produced in its first decade? With less then two years to go, Iron Man now has that title. I’m not kidding.

It’s a complete movie that flows so very well. Unlike similar films that are geared mostly to kids, this one has something for the grown ups. The way you’re drawn to the main character as he grows from a smug dealer to a true conflicted hero is remarkable. As a viewer, you are constantly vacillating between intense sequences and fun moments. Needless to say, the ILM special effects are naturally flawless and spectacular. There’s nothing to dislike about this movie. In every respect, it’s a better film then any other effort of the century, so far.

10/10 :im::up:
 
Don't be too hard on yourself!
I was pretty stupefied about how amazing this movie was, and I'm sure I missed certain things... But I really did try to soak it all up as much as I could!

I did go in with great expectations, but all the while I still had this sick feeling in my stomach that I'd been sucked into the hype, that I'd seen the best this movie had to offer, and I let a few bad apples worry me with their reviews... But as the movie rolled along, I had a hard time keeping my jaw off the floor...

When this started, and I saw how hard Favreau was working to make this successful, I really was geeked and had a gut feeling that this would be the comic movie we'd been waiting for;

he really cared what the fans had to say, and he knew the importance of not deviating too far from the comics if it wasn't necessary, he's one of the first comic book movie directors to realize that the pool of ideas in the Marvel mythos is vast enough so that you don't need to interject some fresh ideas and go your own direction...

I'm no Iron Man expert, but to me this felt more like a Iron Man movie then Spider-Man felt like a Spidey movie, or that X-Men felt like a X-men movie... Just blown away man... BLOW AWAY :wow:

I'm right there with you. Whilst watching the movie, I was mostly thinking Holy S***. This is awesome. But n the back of my mind I was worried I'd jumped onto the hype. But with the great action/effects, character, quality and humour, this was simply brilliant.

Lets all have an online Iron Man partay!
 
I'll go get the drinks, we'll celebrate this Stark style! :hehe:
 
As this century started, who would have thought that a comic book film would be the best movie produced in its first decade? With less then two years to go, Iron Man now has that title. I’m not kidding.

It’s a complete movie that flows so very well. Unlike similar films that are geared mostly to kids, this one has something for the grown ups. The way you’re drawn to the main character as he grows from a smug dealer to a true conflicted hero is remarkable. As a viewer, you are constantly vacillating between intense sequences and fun moments. Needless to say, the ILM special effects are naturally flawless and spectacular. There’s nothing to dislike about this movie. In every respect, it’s a better film then any other effort of the century, so far.

10/10 :im::up:

Whoa!! That's some claim!

BTW, I really happy for Favs, he came from nowhere to smack this one out of the park.
 
I don't know why Sony would ever let go of a property like Spider-Man. It would be insane. The right to make Spider-Man movies is like a license to print money.
I don't know. Most people hated SM3 (me included) and Sony was disappointed with the DVD sales of SM3 'cause they didn't really match the theatrical run. Well, surprise! The movie sucked! So, the fourth one might suffer have the B&R effect.
 
I'll go get the drinks, we'll celebrate this Stark style! :hehe:

Uh..I'd be careful about celebriting it 'Stark Style' if I was you...he tends to go on a bender every now and then.

MarvelZombiesHCIronManCover.jpg
 
I saw the film yesterday with my brother and girlfriend. I want to say the movie was very well done, but as I am too budy with my college stuff, I will just write its pros and cons hoping nobody will blame me.

Anyway, positive:

1) Story structure - the film isn't using everyday storytelling structure of superhero movie, which has become very old and weak. It doesn't start like Spidey, it offers more than anybody would expect. There is everything - from a strong drama followed by amazing protagonist and supporting characters to a real explosion of action. Although the story doesn't resemble 100% of usual superhero flick, it does respect its genre. But the best thing about it was Tony Stark himself. Without him and his storyline of well-known reach business mogul, there wouldn't be anything exciting in terms of interest to the main character. I also like that this time a love interest of the main character doesn't get kidnapped by the villian, which happened in all previous superhero films and is no more smart. In addition to this, I loved the end, because of 1) Stark not getting a moment to kiss Pepper; and b) him finally doing something that no other superhero had done before in films, I am talking about Tony's announcement of being Iron Man.

2) Cast - Favreau gathered a great cast around his film. Everybody seems perfect for their parts. And it's one of Dawney's best achievements!

3) Vissual effects - ILM has a great chance of getting Oscar Award this times, if only academy don't go with another "winner" to just surprise peaople like what happened this year. Action scenes and IM suits looked just great!

Negative:

1) Story. There were many story holes and flaws, so there is a lot of stuff to improve in the sequel. First, I didn't get how Stane could get into Stark's house so easily that Tony didn't notice him. Plus, I would have liked to get more explanation of how suit is working and what was its source of power (don't get me wrong, I understood it, but still I thought it wouldn't be unnecessary). Besides, I still didn't like that building Mark 1 and 2 looked so easy on screen that it just seemed like everybody could do that.

2) Music, it was movie's worst aspect.

My rate: 8.5 out of 10, close to Batman Begins.
 
I liked the music when Tony was at the casino, and the background jazz band was playing the old Iron Man song from the 60's MMMS cartoons...

:word: :word: :word:

:yay:
 
Seen Iron Man last night at my local theater. Pretty good movie. Not much of a review, but that's it. I enjoyed it.
 
I saw the film yesterday with my brother and girlfriend. I want to say the movie was very well done, but as I am too budy with my college stuff, I will just write its pros and cons hoping nobody will blame me.

Anyway, positive:

1) Story structure - the film isn't using everyday storytelling structure of superhero movie, which has become very old and weak. It doesn't start like Spidey, it offers more than anybody would expect. There is everything - from a strong drama followed by amazing protagonist and supporting characters to a real explosion of action. Although the story doesn't resemble 100% of usual superhero flick, it does respect its genre. But the best thing about it was Tony Stark himself. Without him and his storyline of well-known reach business mogul, there wouldn't be anything exciting in terms of interest to the main character. I also like that this time a love interest of the main character doesn't get kidnapped by the villian, which happened in all previous superhero films and is no more smart. In addition to this, I loved the end, because of 1) Stark not getting a moment to kiss Pepper; and b) him finally doing something that no other superhero had done before in films, I am talking about Tony's announcement of being Iron Man.

2) Cast - Favreau gathered a great cast around his film. Everybody seems perfect for their parts. And it's one of Dawney's best achievements!

3) Vissual effects - ILM has a great chance of getting Oscar Award this times, if only academy don't go with another "winner" to just surprise peaople like what happened this year. Action scenes and IM suits looked just great!

Negative:

1) Story. There were many story holes and flaws, so there is a lot of stuff to improve in the sequel. First, I didn't get how Stane could get into Stark's house so easily that Tony didn't notice him. Plus, I would have liked to get more explanation of how suit is working and what was its source of power (don't get me wrong, I understood it, but still I thought it wouldn't be unnecessary). Besides, I still didn't like that building Mark 1 and 2 looked so easy on screen that it just seemed like everybody could do that.

2) Music, it was movie's worst aspect.

My rate: 8.5 out of 10, close to Batman Begins.

Glad you enjoyed it Cine. :up:

The 2 parts bolded:

I agree that it was refreshing the way Stark and Pepper's relationship was never brought to the usual cliche point, the way she sarcastically knocked him back with a smile at the end was great. :D

Stane could access Tony's house b/c he was his life long friend and had always had access, at that point he wasn't thinking Stane would go beyond betrayal to actually try to kill him.
 
I noticed the name while watching the credits, but doubted that was actually THE Tom Morello...are you sure?

Yup it was him he did the guitar parts in the action scenes.

It was a great rock soundtrack, I loved that Tony was listening to Suicidal Tendencies while he was tinkering with his hot rod.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"