Project862006
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 21,197
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
i think spiderman needs to have an epic look to it hey but thats just me
Agreed. That changes the playing field drastically. If that's true, I honestly do not see how they expect to make a great enough film for the masses to get into. This is borderline indie drama, with supernatural characters.Seriously, that 80 million budget has me worried for the first time since this reboot was announced.
Showtime, don't you think we could have a change of tread title? like official : Mark Webb..
Yup, 80 seem pretty low, but that could confirm a more grounded approach yes, and also that they're not willing to take too much risks in what they possibly are going to try?
Relative cast of unknowns in Thor?
Natalie Portman
Samuel L. Jackson
Kat Dennings
Anthony Hopkins
Stellan Skarsgård
Ray Stevenson
Tom Hiddleston
Rene Russo
If he is working with 80 million dollars and a cast of unknowns he is most certainly a studio guy. I'm not sure what the debate is here.
I wouldn't have been THAT MUCH against it if it was 8 years after S-M4. HOWEVER, that's not the case, and it's very sad.There is nothing wrong what so ever with it. I loved Raimi's stuff. But it seems your against this film. So is there anything wrong with Loving Spider-Man, Loving Raimi's Spider-man, and loving the idea of some one new doing it too?
And now the rest is not directed at you.
thats what I was saying. But its not a Thor thread back to SpideyThese people are not really known names to teh general audience. Plus their paychecks are more than likely very smal compared to the other 3 not highlighted.
As you said, Matrix was over a decade ago. As for D9, that thing was shot on a landfill and had very minimal action. Not at all comparable to a proper Spidey film.
I agree it should be higher, so lets see what happens. All I'm saying is sometimes smaller budgets can do wonders.
Sure thing Maze.
80 million is very low but they can make it work.
There is somewhat of a requirement with characters like Spider-Man and Superman to spend some money. You can still tighten your belts. But under $100 million? Your average budget is around $130 million nowadays. I'm not one to usually be doom and gloom because there tends to be more going on underway than is told out loud.
But this sounds bad...
one of the best from 2009, one of my favorite romantic comedies of all timeI've no idea who Marc Webb is, so this means very little to me.
Is his 500 days of Summer movie any good?
Sure thing Maze.
80 million is very low but they can make it work
This is a good example of a small budget doing alot. But hmmm.District 9 only took $30 Million to make, and that turned out really well.
I think this movie will be fine.
I've no idea who Marc Webb is, so this means very little to me.
Is his 500 days of Summer movie any good?
Yes, but this was possible because very little money actually went into location. I stress again, it was a landfill. How can you compare that to a metropolitan area? Even if they opt for a NYC stand-in, that's going to cost a hefty amount of money. Be it on-set locations or building sets.Yea but 30 was the whole budget. And they probably still had what 15 for the SFX. I mean that thing was SFX loaded, the Prawns were all CGI, Christopher was in it tons and looked amazing. I'm not saying this will be a great thing, I'm just saying it can be done.
Sony's gonna screw this movie up.
Look at your sig.
I just think they may not be putting out big pay checks if this is true to big actors. But who knows this may just be a rumor right now. Budget is not locked in yet.
But to me D9 proved you can do cheap SFX and make it look amazing. For 30 million they had some of the best SFX for District 9 period.