To be honest I am fine with most of the changes but I just can't stand Barry Allen. I prefer Wally. However that being said if it wasn't for them doing away the the marriage of Lois and Clark I would be on board for this. I don't want to have to wait another 15 years to see them get married again or maybe not be together at all.Really Ultimate Superman? What if it was Grant Morrison wanting this? I honestly cannot understand why you rather blame fictional characters instead of the creative teams and the top writers who want to do these things. I mean i know he's a charming, but what if he is the true devil:
![]()
No I read just as much with Barry but I felt there was no need to bring him back because he died a hero in such a great way. If there would have been a time to bring him back it would have been after the relaunch.So you acknowledge you're just blaming Barry because you've read more stuff on Wally and would like to keep it that way?
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/03/05/swipe-file-one-more-day-vs-superman-2000/
It's not the first time anyhow Morrison has doodled with the idea, but also Morrison prefers Wonder Woman and Batman because they're both nobles, while Superman is a farmer and has a boss.
Then Superman should come out of this pretty awesome.
Really Ultimate Superman? What if it was Grant Morrison wanting this? I honestly cannot understand why you rather blame fictional characters instead of the creative teams and the top writers who want to do these things. I mean i know he's a charming, but what if he is the true devil:
![]()
So, if Morrison is writing the main Superman title, and Cornell is still writing Action Comics...
![]()
Considering Grant Morrison's age and his more recent runs, I think it's more likely that he grew up on Silver and Bronze Age Superman comics as opposed to the Byrne Era Superman comics. Hell, his modern work such as Final Crisis, All Star Superman, Batman, Batman, Incorporated, etc. are essentially his love letters to the Silver and Bronze Ages.
Also, while there are a lot of things wrong with post-Crisis Superman, there are a lot of things done very well with the post-Crisis era Superman such as his marriage to Lois Lane, the use of his parents, Clark Kent being the real person, etc.
The marriage I am okay with. The Kents being alive I completely reject, and Clark Kent is not the real person and that was established by Jerry Siegel. Any Superman where Clark is the real person and Superman is the disguise is not a legitimate version of Superman in my eyes. Siegel very explicitly said that Superman was the real person. There WAS a real Clark Kent, but he died when Ma and Pa Kent died. The Clark Kent that is left is an act. This is also part of why the Kents need to die. Them dying kills off the real Clark Kent and just leaves the meek, mild-mannered Clark that walks slumped over and looks down at his feet and is awkward and introverted. This makes Superman the real person and Clark a disguise, but a disguise that Superman needs to cope with his awesome responsibilities. Superman needs Clark Kent like most people need dreams. He's a coping mechanism and a compulsive habit and need of Superman's.
I don't believe that Clark is a disguise, nor is Superman. I believe that each represents his core self in the situation that is needed. We all act differently around different people. Aren't you the same person when talking to your parents, children, or coworkers? Yet in each of those situations don't you act differently for whatever purpose is needed?I think that even when Clark is the disguise, there still needs to be a real human personality in there somewhere, otherwise he's like Martian Manhunter, an alien who lived a full life as an alien before coming to Earth and assuming a human disguise. He was raised as a human afterall.