His recent work on Superboy #10 was top notched and its a fantastic issue from start to end. He also did fantastic work on Red Hood and the Outlaws month after month.

The main problem with the Superman title is, and always will be, that it feels wholly inconsequential compared to what Grant's doing in Action.
Nothing Superboy #10 was a good book expect for Cassie. Since before Flashpoint Cassie has been acting like she is on a really bad period and it just hasn't stopped yet. This whole issue on her part was nothing but her d-teasing Superboy. However Superboy was well written.What's wrong with you![]()
Sethypants, are you Scott Lobdell in disguise?
Um, it's laughable because I've read Superboy #10, and it was utter ****?
It doesn't make any sense that DC is treating the Superman title that way. Take a look at the Batman line. Sure, Detective Comics and Batman: The Dark Knight don't have anything consequential happening just like with Superman, but Scott Snyder's Batman, Grant Morrison's Batman Incorporated, and Peter Tomasi's Batman & Robin seem to be working quite well with one another. And then we have all the other Bat-books integrating themselves with Snyder's Batman, and those that currently aren't, are planning on linking themselves more to that narrative.
But instead, we're hearing rumors that Grant Morrison is just doing whatever he wants and the other writers have to play catch up even as their books just don't go along with what Morrison is doing. It would make soooooo much more sense to have a great writer on Superman (like Paul Cornell) along with Supergirl and Superboy and have them link to Morrison's narrative.
Oh shoot, you got me there. I might as well hang in the towel now.not according to reviews and general consensus on comics sites' forums.
Are you seriously defending Detective Comics and pre-Hurwitz Batman: The Dark Knight?Thats the thing. Writers are not making bigger and bolder stories. Just look at the first issue Scott is going to write for Superman. We're already going to read about the retconned version of the eradicator and learn even more about Krypton. The past 9 issues have only been safe and have not told any stories that could be added to Superman mythos, unlike what the batman books are doing. Honestly, After Gregg Hurwitz take over Batman, I have to say all the 5 batman books are in great shape. Its either attached to a critically acclaimed writer, a superstar writer or a critically acclaimed artist or superstar artist.
Also Detective Comics and Dark Knight both have achieved tons, creating new and returning villains, telling new stories with old villains, the storyline of 'tec is even being played out in Suicide Squad.
What has Superman achieved for 9 issues other than the suit? I honestly don't care about Helspont's 2 miserable appearance just for him to go back to being in the wildstorm universe part of DC. If only writers retconned Helspont such that his greatest enemy is Superman or tie him into Krypton or whatever, that would be bold and inventive. Except, this book became a place to showcase other characters that have nothing to do with supes.
If Batman books are all getting something, why can't they change things up and give Superman an A-list artist coupled with a writer that is bold?
David Finch is more responsible for switching the writers on Batman: The Dark Knight than DC editorial. And he switched it up because he knows that he's not a writer. And DC editorial is switching up the writers on Superman because they don't know how to treat the book.I'm tired of Sups being played as a second fiddle to batman. Things obviously aren't working, so DC switched it up. Its the same thing they did to Dark Knight as well. It wasn't working so DC changed the writer.
Oh, and just for you folks who don't care enough to actually check (IE, the entirety of the human race minus me and sethypants), here's some quotes from one of the few legitimate reviews of Superboy #10, from IGN...
"Superboy #10 is actually worth looking at. Maybe not reading, but worth looking at."
"Almost everything positive I have to say about this issue is because of Sebastian Fiumara."
"His killer style is wasted on a title like Superboy...Somebody pull this guy off Superboy."
"The dialogue is not nearly as over done as it has been in the past. None of it is particularly good..."
"The last page of this issue instructs you to buy Teen Titans #10 to find out what happens. That is lame."
Yep, the entire western world is singing Lobdell's praises.
BOTTOM LINE: WORTH IT
Superboy #10 takes a moment to get to speed, but once it does it is a good looking fun read that gets into the character. We have some great moments between the Wonder Girl and Superboy and we see him use the tactile telekinesis in another interesting manor, reminding us of his individuality in the Super family. Despite the initial stumble, Superboy #10 manages to earn itself a well-deserved 3.5 out of 5 stars.
Throughout the first 9 issues of Superboy I have wondered if the book would ever leave the confines of N.O.W.H.E.R.E. and move towards more independent adventures for the title character. Superboy #10 was a step in the right direction......
Overall grade B+/B
Are you seriously defending Detective Comics and pre-Hurwitz Batman: The Dark Knight?
David Finch is more responsible for switching the writers on Batman: The Dark Knight than DC editorial. And he switched it up because he knows that he's not a writer. And DC editorial is switching up the writers on Superman because they don't know how to treat the book.
Who on earth considers 3.5/5 a good rating.
If I didn't mention it before, the reason I posted quotes from IGN is because it's actually a well known, and legitimate multimedia review and news site. Unlike these podunk links you're posting.
So lemme get this straight, after 9 issues of admittedly awful comics, you're trying to win us over to Lobdell based on a single issue that all of these reviews were admittedly surprised to rate decently?
Why don't you go back there and leave us good people alone, huh?http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?415369-Superboy-10-preview
forum talk, with majority of the people liking the issue, check it out if you want.

Who on earth considers 3.5/5 a good rating.
If I didn't mention it before, the reason I posted quotes from IGN is because it's actually a well known, and legitimate multimedia review and news site. Unlike these podunk links you're posting.
So lemme get this straight, after 9 issues of admittedly awful comics, you're trying to win us over to Lobdell based on a single issue that all of these reviews were admittedly surprised to rate decently?
Why don't you go back there and leave us good people alone, huh?![]()
Awesome. Me, anubis and hippie can spoon.you can be left alone in the corner, "good people"
