J
jas01724
Guest
Bully for you. You reap what you sow.JcDc said:If you look back on the thread it's pretty obvious it's not just one person antagonizing.
Bully for you. You reap what you sow.JcDc said:If you look back on the thread it's pretty obvious it's not just one person antagonizing.
LOL! Y'know James, I picture you sitting there with a pouty face now. Too damn funny.jas01724 said:*pouts*
I hope he goes for an action flick. I just caught Van Helsing on DVD tonight. Not the greatest film ever - by a LONG shot - but it *was* entertaining. Lots of eye candy. I'd love to see Tom do something along those lines, except with a better director and story. Anything action/sci-fi/fantasy oriented and I'll be in my happy place.As for Tom, I wonder what movie role he WILL be doing.
I've noticed that happens with a LOT of people on this board. The WHOLE board.Oh, and Pat... don't tell Jc that Tom's already Superman, apparently the truth has a tendency to overload his cerebral cortex.
I do a good pouty face! Ask my mum.AgentPat said:LOL! Y'know James, I picture you sitting there with a pouty face now. Too damn funny.
I'd like a complete change of pace as he's already doing action/sci-fi. He's also proven he can do rom-com, so i'd quite like to see see how he'd handle a period piece.I hope he goes for an action flick. ... Anything action/sci-fi/fantasy oriented and I'll be in my happy place.
There you go being self important again. At this point in time, of the three people currently in this discussion, 2 think that for all intent and purpose he's already Superman. One doesn't. Your "we" suddenly sounds a little exaggerated.JcDc said:We all know he isn't Superman already.
This argument is utterly ridiculous...JcDc said:We all know he isn't Superman already. He's playing Clark Kent in smallville only. He doesn't wear the suit, doesn't have his own job at The Planet (though he keeps meeting everyone as a teenager )... It's a wb freak of the week tv series, that of which I do actually enjoy watching, it's good for what it is. It just wouldn't work for the big screen.
AgentPat said:Eh. The attempts to antagonize Welling fans for his not being in the film are ridiculous. Hello? He already IS Superman - and very much known for it. Just think of all the actors out there who won't - and will NEVER - be able to say that. The list can start with Mr. Law and work its way all the way to Mr. Caviezel for all we care. Keep that in mind folks. It's quite a small and elite club, and Tom is a member for life. In-at 'pecial?
Here's an oldie but a goodie. Clark who?
triplet said:Of course Clark Kent is superman. Superman is Clark's alter ego in the post crisis continuity (if I'm not mistaken), not the other way around.
Well then I go the simple route; they're all Kal-El, and whomever plays Kal-El is playing all other variants of that character by default. Including Superman.sage1047 said:I see it another way. IMO, there are three personalities. There's the PUBLIC Clark Kent, which acts more as a disguise, Superman, which is closer to Clark's real personality but more confident, and the REAL Clark Kent, which is who he is when he's alone or with people who knows his secret.
Thank GAWD! Now scram!JcDc said:Now I'll leave you to your thread to discuss Welling's role as a 27 year old teen Clark Kent on tv who's yet to become Superman.
I wouldn't mind a GOOD rom-com, but very few directors can do that well. Seems like most have an easier time blowing up cars. LOLjas01724 said:I'd like a complete change of pace as he's already doing action/sci-fi. He's also proven he can do rom-com, so I'd quite like to see how he'd handle a period piece.
jas01724 said:And Clark Kent is who, precisely?
Beat me to it. As much as I prefer CK as the disguise, the fact remains, they're one in the same being. And as James pointed out, BOTH are Kal-El when you come right down to it.triplet said:Clark Kent is Superman. Superman is Clark's alter ego in the post crisis continuity (if I'm not mistaken), not the other way around.
Oh, Triplet, just ignore him. We have a forum here where discussion about SV AND Superman is allowed - for obvious reasons. I may not post that much right now (Fall/Holiday season is very busy for us - lots of staging going on, so I don't have the time to post), but I do still read. Most folks here are pretty level-headed and post interesting comments. Just ignore the trolls.I'm taking a month off of this place this time. Maybe by then all this bull**** will be over and done with.
They are. That Rolling Stone cover is from 2002, if I'm not mistaken.sage1047 said:TV's new Superman. And here I thought magazines were calling him this generation's Superman.
AgentPat said:For me, it doesn't matter whether he's seen on TV, film, or in comic books - Superman is as real as the individual wants him to be. Just because a film has a higher budget and reaches a larger audience, it doesn't necessarily mean its version of Superman is any more "official" than the ones drawn in comic books or seen on TV shows (with or without the suit.)
Superman is a paradigm for hope, ideals, and being a good person. He's all about truth, principle and ethicality. He leads by example, and is led by his own integrity, honor and conviction. These concepts are easily lost in the mainstream audience. But if a whole new generation of fans have been introduced - or reintroduced as the case might be - to who Superman is and what he represents through the power of a tv show, then I believe it to be a legitimate argument for those fans so touched to view that show's icon as their generation's Superman. If he's not yours, so be it. We all don't have to agree. Twenty years from now, I'm sure there will be another Superman for folks to look up to, and he won't be Welling, Routh, Reeve or any other name we know of today. Superman is an enduring myth, and just like the character, he'll be around for a very very long time.
AgentPat said:They are. That Rolling Stone cover is from 2002, if I'm not mistaken.
MUST we argue this? Again? Here? Come on Sage. This is stupid, pointless, and it wastes bandwidth. Not to mention the fact that it's been BEATEN into the ground. Clark Kent IS Superman, and vice versa. And, it's not the suit, or the flying, or working at the Daily Planet that defines him.
...Wait, I believe I've already commented on this in another thread. I'll just quote myself; it's easier than retyping it:
jas01724 said:Well then I go the simple route; they're all Kal-El, and whomever plays Kal-El is playing all other variants of that character by default. Including Superman.
JcDc said:We all know he isn't Superman already. He's playing Clark Kent in smallville only.
triplet said:I'm taking a month off of this place this time. Maybe by then all this bull**** will be over and done with.
JcDc said:P.s. pwnage Now I'll leave you to your thread to discuss Welling's role as a 27 year old teen Clark Kent on tv who's yet to become Superman
AgentPat said:I wouldn't mind a GOOD rom-com, but very few directors can do that well. Seems like most have an easier time blowing up cars. LOL
AgentPat said:I hope he goes for an action flick. I just caught Van Helsing on DVD tonight. Not the greatest film ever - by a LONG shot - but it *was* entertaining. Lots of eye candy.
Serene said:*sigh* There is this same stoopid argument in the Brandon R. thread in the Superman foum right now. For those who may not have seen it - someone posted a list of everyone who has played Supes before, and of course.. immediately someone said that Tom W. doesn't belong on it since we don't see him as Superman on the show. I pointed out the 3rd season ep, Hereafter, where we see Clark's supposed "death" (or non-death, actually), and all we are shown is the RED CAPE WITH A YELLOW \S/ on it. I even posted the pic... You would not believe the responses. The anti-Welling prejudice of some people is just ridiculous.
Here's the pic:
Welling has been on the covers of a LOT of magazines. I'm unaware of any that say "this generation's Superman" however, or something along those lines. If the phrase is mentioned at all, it's usually in the accompanying article. Most mags just print his name in tiny letters (if it's printed at all - note the Rolling Stone cover) and some combination of "Clark Kent," "Superman," or "Smallville" in bold to get people's attention.sage1047 said:I just never saw the covers of magazines that said such.
Well, I would too. But don't hold your breath. Rumor has it that Warners will not be doing any official publicity for the film till after it's shot. Compound this with their desire to put as much distance between film and skein, and it's re-heeeely doubtful that they'd be okay with Welling and Routh appearing together on the cover of a magazine. Wow, how to confuse the public, ahuh! What might be more likely is seeing both together at some industry or media event, unrelated to SV or Singer's film - after principal on the latter is completed. Just a hunch. And I'm sure the paparazzi would have a field day with that "unintentional" meeting.I wonder if we'll see one in the future with both Routh and Welling on the cover. It could be something like: "Every generation deserves a Superman. Well this one gets two Count'em, two Supermen!" It would be a cool cover and they can do an interview and such. I'd pay to get that magazine.