Awww, I feel loved.Serene said:Be sure to check out tomwelling.org. Our favorite webmaster has posted a link to some new and really sharp Tom shots.
jas01724 said:(Though the pictures aren't exactly new in the literal sense. Mid-late 2003 I believe.)
AgentPat said:In the category of new but not really new...
![]()
I just really like that one.
Bruce_Wayne29 said:Maybe it's just me but I really like this picture. They look perfect. Add a pair of glasses on Tom and it would be perfect, don't you think ?
![]()
Thanks, Kiki. I see they moved both The Fog and CBtD2 threads. Whatever. I'm not gonna go chasing news over to the misc film forum where NOBODY will likely care about those films anyway. Only reason they were brought up to begin with was because of Welling's involvement, so I'll just keep my updates (if I come across any) here. At least THIS thread won't be moved - or closed.KikiDee said:Okay, they moved the Cheaper by the Dozen thread and I'm not in the mood to look for it so here is another link for confirmation on Tom doing the film. Pat has the article posted on the Cheaper by the Dozen thread or you can just click here:
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117924107?categoryid=28&cs=1

There may be hope for you yet, Mehzeb.M.E.H.Z.E.B said:i have the first cheaper by the dozen... unbelievably... i bought the damn thing just to watch what they did with welling. up until then, i didn't realize, how much i liked the guy. im definitely gonna get cheaper by the dozen 2, now that confirmation about welling's involvement has arrived![]()


jas01724 said:I can't believe they squished the news into a "newsbites" article... and that I completely missed it! I guess Tom isn't important enough to get a press release after all....
Ah well, you can't really be wrong about the date of a press release when there IS NO FREAKIN' RELEASE! *ahem*
At least Pat found that article today - if you'd found it tomorrow it would have had to wait until wednesday or thursday when I wont be quite so drugged up. (I go into the nice 'ospital for my slice'n'dice on monday and I'll be staying through tuesday.)
I know! LOL Go figure?jas01724 said:I can't believe they squished the news into a "newsbites" article... and that I completely missed it! I guess Tom isn't important enough to get a press release after all....![]()
I didn't check HR. Maybe it was released there?? [shrugs]Ah well, you can't really be wrong about the date of a press release when there IS NO FREAKIN' RELEASE! *ahem*
Y'know, I wouldn't have found it either if it wasn't for Kiki and her posting the HSE info. I scratched my chin and headed over to Variety to see if there was a press release and found that blurb, so I was as surprised as you, James.At least Pat found that article today...
Oh, gawd! What I miss? Your knee? *cringing*- if you'd found it tomorrow it would have had to wait until wednesday or thursday when I wont be quite so drugged up. (I go into the nice 'ospital for my slice'n'dice on monday and I'll be staying through tuesday.)
Thanks, and of course I will!triplet said:Good luck to you on that.. I know you need it.
Let us know how things went, 'kay?

I guess it really will depend on the scope of his role. If it's small I won't be surprised by the lack of a big release about, but I was pretty much assured there would be one so... me dunno.AgentPat said:I know! LOL Go figure?
Nope, not even as much as Variety has up.AgentPat said:I didn't check HR. Maybe it was released there?? [shrugs]
I'd been looking at THR and V at least twice a day for the past month, and they lump it into something that doesn't even have his name (or the movie's name, for that matter) in its title. They put Taylor somethingorothers name in the title, fer gawd's sake....AgentPat said:I was as surprised as you, James.
Heh, you missed my running commentary on the knee situation? How'd that happen?AgentPat said:Oh, gawd! What I miss? Your knee? *cringing*
OUCH OUCH OUCH
Bruce_Wayne29 said:Maybe it's just me but I really like this picture. They look perfect. Add a pair of glasses on Tom and it would be perfect, don't you think ?
![]()
sigh