jimmylace said:yeah black goggles,mouthmask=no point in seeing it!!!!
jimmylace said:It's off-topic but I hope they do a trilogy box-set with more features.
I know raimi is doing spider-man 2.5 with extra scenes.... If they ever do, I hope they go back to the first and touch up some of the horrendous cgi *shudder* I never realised how bad it was until I watched the first one recently. just a thought no discussion required-sure you all agree.....
jimmylace said:yeah,its a pretty flawed movie when you go back to it. baby-steps I suppose....theres some really cringe worthy moments in there. "those eyes those horrible yellow eyes!!!!!" hehehe In fact,the first hour is pretty weak, but the rest of it amps up quite a bit. same with the second one really.....(although I think the 2nd one is better overall-just because its consistent and actually "uses" spiderman more)
GoldGoblin said:^I would love to see them update the CGI in the first movie,extend the fights,and I would even like to see them add some purple to the GG costume.
SpiderB said:That's not the only thing he was right about. The set pics from the alley totally seal his credibility. As much as people like to deny it, those pics show the exact scene he described. Harry's costume is black...he attacks Peter in an alley but gets knocked off his glider and Peter saves him and takes him to a hospital. In the pics we see a guy in a black costume laid out in an alley, and a guy dressed in a suit jumping down from the top of the alley to him. It's too accurate to be coincidence. And we've seen his myspace, where he lists Sony Pictures as one of the companies he works for. And I don't believe for one second that this guy would make up all that stuff AND go to the trouble of adjusting his myspace to back up his lie, just in case somebody happened to find him on there. Everything he said was logical. Usually these fakers get on here knowing NOTHING about the film industry, and it's very obvious from thir "scoops" that they're making it up. But everything this guy said made perfect sense, and we've seen nothing that disproves him. Everything we've seen so far has backed him up, in fact. As I said earlier, I would almost guarantee that when this movie comes out, all the disbelievers are going to be proven wrong.
Spider-Bite said:And who exactly confirmed that was Harry laying on the ground? It didn't even look like a real person to me, it looked like a test dummy with his arms and legs laying in unhuman positions. In one of the pictures it looks like he doesn't even have a hand. in the other pics it looks like he has no face, just like Dummies look.
We know nothing about the alley other than it's an alley. we got an alley scene in the last movie, and there will probably be at least a couple seconds of an alley in every spider-man movie. The alley pics did not effect the credibility of the Q & A at all.
for all we know that guy "jumping down" was merely bending over to pick something up. it looked like he was wearing a trenchcoat for crying out loud. spider-man doesn't wear those. He could have been an off-screen crew member for all we know. they were definitely not movie stills.
SpiderB said:That's not the only thing he was right about. The set pics from the alley totally seal his credibility. As much as people like to deny it, those pics show the exact scene he described. Harry's costume is black...he attacks Peter in an alley but gets knocked off his glider and Peter saves him and takes him to a hospital. In the pics we see a guy in a black costume laid out in an alley, and a guy dressed in a suit jumping down from the top of the alley to him. It's too accurate to be coincidence. And we've seen his myspace, where he lists Sony Pictures as one of the companies he works for. And I don't believe for one second that this guy would make up all that stuff AND go to the trouble of adjusting his myspace to back up his lie, just in case somebody happened to find him on there. Everything he said was logical. Usually these fakers get on here knowing NOTHING about the film industry, and it's very obvious from thir "scoops" that they're making it up. But everything this guy said made perfect sense, and we've seen nothing that disproves him. Everything we've seen so far has backed him up, in fact. As I said earlier, I would almost guarantee that when this movie comes out, all the disbelievers are going to be proven wrong.
SpiderB said:- There's nothing unhuman about the position of the body lying on the ground.
- It looks like he has no face because obviously he's far away and the whole picture is little blurry.
- I know there have been many alley scenes in the movies. But the pictures of this one show very closely what he described. It's not like it's just some picture of an empty alley.
- He said The Goblin attacks PETER, not Spider-Man. What he's wearing is a suit, not a trenchcoat (it's too short to be a trenchcoat).
- Review the other pictures. They wouldn't put a big blue saftey mattress under him if he were just bending over to pick something up off the ground. It was to practice for a landing from a high jump on wires. Watch the behind the scenes stuff from the other films. They do it all the time with the wire stunts.
End.
Accurate Schmaccurate! I see no evidence of Harry, Peter, the glider or the hospital in these pictures.SpiderB said:As much as people like to deny it, those pics show the exact scene he described. Harry's costume is black...he attacks Peter in an alley but gets knocked off his glider and Peter saves him and takes him to a hospital. In the pics we see a guy in a black costume laid out in an alley, and a guy dressed in a suit jumping down from the top of the alley to him. It's too accurate to be coincidence.
Spiderpig said:Accurate Schmaccurate! I see no evidence of Harry, Peter, the glider or the hospital in these pictures.