The Spider-Man 3 First Look Thread [Merged]

They can show action but quick shots of it, so we're not fed everything before we see the entire movie itself. From the trailers we've seen so far and because its spider-man, filling the seats wont be a problem. Thats why I want little shown as possible because when people do go and see it, they'll be blown away faster than you can say, Katrina.

Yeah, I see your point. However, Bryan Singer tried your strategy with Superman Returns. Look where it brought Superman. Singer probably thought like you did, "its spider-man, filling the seats wont be a problem" - well... boy, was he proven wrong. I pray to God that Raimi doesn't make that same mistake.
 
The point you made is fair enough, but why not regard the situation with a bit more sensitivity idiot -- I'm sick of hearing people bad-mouth this guy . . . it's obvious he's a young lad so give him an effin break. :cmad:

Let's not start anything here. Please. This place is already a pit full of vipers. Let's not aggravate the situation.
 
Let's not start anything here. Please. This place is already a pit full of vipers. Let's not aggravate the situation.

I know, and I'm sorry -- I don't normally open my mouth concerning things like this, but there are nicer ways to say the things he said!
 
I know, and I'm sorry -- I don't normally open my mouth concerning things like this, but there are nicer ways to say the things he said!

Yeah. We all wish everyone here was nicer to each other, however, things don't always turn out how we want them to.
 
Ain't that the truth, and again, I'm sorry for opening my mouth . . .
 
Can anyone please place it on ifilm? I cannot view youtube at work, but for some reason we can view ifilm.

thanks
 
i cant view it, stupid school computers!!
 
Maybe for you, bro. I wouldn't want everything to be shown in the trailers, but the general public need a little nudge to convince them that this is the movie of the year. Action is the key. By your standards, we shouldn't be shown anything at all - seeing as the first two movies were ruined because of the trailers - for you. But well, they did very well in the box office, and dvd sales were through the roof, so I guess the problem only lies with the minority. Anyway, back to the discussion at hand. :hyper:
mez, this is a slight overreaction..

there is nothing wrong with teasing people with action, but in this day and age, the footage they are using to sell films is simply far too much...

whole battles are being used to advertise films, i mean the last stand used over 14 minutes of footage in its attempt to draw in crowds, 14 minutes is a lot.

What is the point of releasing over 10% of film footage in order to sell the material when no more than about 3 would suffice if done correctly.

Besides, it's spiderman 3, they really don't need anything more than a name and a gimmick to sell this film. and the new costume provides more than that, Plus venom and you have crowds hooked.

Pirate's manages to bring in crowds without flooding people with released footage, why do superhero films think they need to do the same, expecially the larger budget ones...

I mean look at ghost rider, that isn't showing virtually any battles in detail and it gets its trailers across perfectly, so does 300 and also transformers...

I think you are taking the lazy approach like most people in advertising that thinking that alluring people in with lots of footage (especially battle stuff) is a good thing because it just leaves people feeling anti-climatic about the film since they have already seen it all (just like iceman's icing up and battle with pyro which i thought was simply highlighted in adverts but was actually shown in full with hindsight leaving me feeling disappointed with my viewing).

it's not good and most likely won't lead to repeat viewings where real money is made

no one is saying spidey is at this stage yet but i fear with so much time to go that it may reach around this point.

you only have to compare it to spidey 2 which only had one villain and there were very limited scenes with ock in any of the adverts and hardly any of them fighting at all, if only two clips repeated over and over...

with this you can pretty much tell whats going to happen in the story, scene for scene and there are plenty of clips of sandy and pete's fight as well as pete against harry with only the big brawl at the end being left completely unseen.
 
so, is there somewhere functional that i can view the first look? neither of the links on the front page are working for me.
 
I'm impressed by Topher Grace's performance. I was a little worried, but it seems like he'll make a great Eddie Brock.
 
the only problem is that it will end up being like x-men, the last stand where the scenes are all shown off completely before we actually get to the film and then people are dissapointed that they've already seen all the major aspects of the scene already.
So basically, they're damned if they do (those that don't want to see too much) and damned if they don't (those who want to the whole movie in trailers) you just can't win in the realm of Geekdom. :o
 
not at all, you can make a perfectly good film trailer or advertise a film without showing too much about it...

blade, x-men, fantastic four, spiderman, x-2, spiderman 2, blade 2, superman all pretty much got the gists across of the film and showed some cool clips without giving away clips from major scenes...

hulk managed to show quite a bit without giving away too much of the feel of the film and it also left out its best bits...

the last stand solely advertised on its best bits leaving the mundane scene left as the only unseen parts...just imagine seeing that sentinel scene for the first time, there was no need for us as fans to see that but it would have lifted my spritis completely even as short as it was. i thought the scene was going to be longer based on what was shown in the footage but it wasn't and that made me feel bummed, the last stand was one big bummer...

and i don't want the same for spidey.

no doubt there is a line but they are releasing a lot of fighting footage though and i don't think that should necessarily be the foocal point of wanting to come and watch this film, the focal point should be the turning to the darkside of spidey (pretty much what is shown in the teaser trailer which i thought was perfect).
 
and for the record, i don't think anyone wants the whole film shown in trailers...
 
true, but the only thing that people want to see at this point is a glipse a Venom. Just a glipse that is different that the one from the leaked trailer.
 
That would never work, not with these fanboys always asking for MORE, it would never be enough for them. And if they did release the entire film in trailers, we'd all watch everyone of them. We're a bunch greedy babies and we must be fed.

Look at the guy above ^ asking to see more VENOM, when people already have him as their AVATAR.
 
ha, showing more venom than that is virtual suicide...

his presence won't help sell him to the main audience and if they don't nail him, it'll send the fanbase to go crazy and ask for raimi's head on a platter, which i think is long overdue personally....
 
Other thing: anyone noticed that every character, Peter Parker/Spider-man, Flint Marko/Sandman, on the interviews, appear in that way, while when Topher appear it only shows Eddie Brock, instead of Eddie Brock/Venom?
 
urghhhhh Please I hope they dub Gwen voice, I got cringed when she said ''Spider-man'' I might be the only one though.
yeah she shouldn't have a yanky accent, she's a brit dammit!!!!!

:mad:
 
ha, showing more venom than that is virtual suicide...

his presence won't help sell him to the main audience and if they don't nail him, it'll send the fanbase to go crazy and ask for raimi's head on a platter, which i think is long overdue personally....
Please, they b:tched about GG, MJ and Doc Ock, and 1.6 Billion dollars later they're counting down the days to SM3 and already people want to see THE LIZARD in SM4. Spare me the HEAD ON A PLATTER bull. These people are all talk, until the film is released. :whatever:
 
sales doesn't equal quality...

besides, this is VENOM...ya know....who although i hate to say it probably has a bigger fanbase than GG, MJ and Doc Ock Combined (although i don't know why).

this isn't a normal incident...there would be repercussions...
 
When did I mention quality, and even that is in the eye of the beholder when it comes to movies?

And do you know where the over-whelming majority of Venom's fanbase is going to be on May 4th, in theaters watching Spider-Man 3?
 
When did I mention quality, and even that is in the eye of the beholder when it comes to movies?

And do you know where the over-whelming majority of Venom's fanbase is going to be on May 4th, in theaters watch Spider-Man 3.
well you mentione 1.6 dollars as if it was a means of evalutating that people were satifactory with with the portrayal of those characters and hence that is reflected with the amount of money grossed, right? Or why would you even bring up sales in the first place..

well obviously they will be in theatres, one can't comment fully on something until it's been properly viewed first hand.

the real question is will they be there for the multiple repeat viewings?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"