• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

The Twitter Thread

Twitter's a complete waste of time. A few people here have actually tried defending it. :whatever:

Given the reality, it's actually quite easy to defend. Twitter's use in Iran validated it's importance. It's also been very useful in sending out sports information quicker than ever.

Twitter is only good in your in the entertainment business to pimp your stuff.

That is another valid use of the medium.

The "scientific" research could easily be applied to the internet as well. Except 40% babble would be 40% porn.
 
Given the reality, it's actually quite easy to defend. Twitter's use in Iran validated it's importance. It's also been very useful in sending out sports information quicker than ever.



That is another valid use of the medium.

The "scientific" research could easily be applied to the internet as well. Except 40% babble would be 40% porn.

now thats inaccurate research. its atleast 50%. :hehe:
 
well i figure they could have done the same through a different avenue than twitter and had the same result.

What if scenario's are interesting, but you can't really use it in a proper discussion.

The reality is that Twitter was found by those in Iran (whose ability to communicate with the outside world was actively oppressed by the Iranian government) found an outlet to the outside world in Twitter that was effective and VITAL to the reporting of the Iranian protests.

That action, compared with it's use to report Breaking Sports news, entertainment news, etc. makes Twitter a valid and important information medium. No matter how others may use it.
 
i can use what ifs if they have equal probability with the actuallity. i mean i wasn't suggesting that they could communicate using mice tied to balloons trying to be homing pigeons.
 
What if scenario's are interesting, but you can't really use it in a proper discussion.

The reality is that Twitter was found by those in Iran (whose ability to communicate with the outside world was actively oppressed by the Iranian government) found an outlet to the outside world in Twitter that was effective and VITAL to the reporting of the Iranian protests.

That action, compared with it's use to report Breaking Sports news, entertainment news, etc. makes Twitter a valid and important information medium. No matter how others may use it.

thats the thing. the privilege of twitter is abused by ignorant people, especially when it comes to celebrities. all they post is random uninteresting things in there lives every second of every day just whining and *****ing. whatever happened to regular blogging? id rather hear about important events in the world as soon as possible and not about ashton kutcher making a ****ing sandwich or when miley cyrus is gonna make another pointless youtube video.
 
I'm sick of CNN because of Twitter. They rely on it too much.
 
with all this talk about pointless research, im starting to question if "research" is even a word in the first place.
dictionary.jpg
 
thats the thing. the privilege of twitter is abused by ignorant people, especially when it comes to celebrities. all they post is random uninteresting things in there lives every second of every day just whining and *****ing. whatever happened to regular blogging? id rather hear about important events in the world as soon as possible and not about ashton kutcher making a ****ing sandwich or when miley cyrus is gonna make another pointless youtube video.

Twitter isn't a "privilege", it's a product. No one forces you to follow celebrities that make irrelevant tweets, but it's hard to deny there is a major market for such information - all you have to do is look at the popularity of MTV and VH1 with it's "celebrity" reality shows and tabloids. People are interested with celebrities, and this is the closest they came to hanging out with them.

The beauty of Twitter is that you pick exactly what you get. Teenage girls can be satisfied by Kutcher and Cyrus's antics, sports fans can get Adam Schefter's latest tidbits of news and those that care about the news can follow news agencies, news makers and the like.
 
Twitter isn't a "privilege", it's a product. No one forces you to follow celebrities that make irrelevant tweets, but it's hard to deny there is a major market for such information - all you have to do is look at the popularity of MTV and VH1 with it's "celebrity" reality shows and tabloids. People are interested with celebrities, and this is the closest they came to hanging out with them.

The beauty of Twitter is that you pick exactly what you get. Teenage girls can be satisfied by Kutcher and Cyrus's antics, sports fans can get Adam Schefter's latest tidbits of news and those that care about the news can follow news agencies, news makers and the like.

And the sad part about Twitter? People actually spend hours wasting time on a website that offers a totally unnecessary service... a service that could easily be replaced by many of the more accessible forms of media which predated it if people didn't flock to Twitter like sheep because Ashton Kutcher and Ellen DeGeneres said it was cool...

Even worse is how this reflects upon society. We've become so lazy, we can't stand to get our news in anything over 180 characters, and we can't Google search the name of our favorite celebrities to get the latest scoop on them.
 
And the sad part about Twitter? People actually spend hours wasting time on a website that offers a totally unnecessary service... a service that could easily be replaced by many of the more accessible forms of media which predated it if people didn't flock to Twitter like sheep because Ashton Kutcher and Ellen DeGeneres said it was cool...

Even worse is how this reflects upon society. We've become so lazy, we can't stand to get our news in anything over 180 characters, and we can't Google search the name of our favorite celebrities to get the latest scoop on them.

i wish aliens could use there advanced technology and use it to put some sense into all our brains. well, if possible.
 
What if scenario's are interesting, but you can't really use it in a proper discussion.

The reality is that Twitter was found by those in Iran (whose ability to communicate with the outside world was actively oppressed by the Iranian government) found an outlet to the outside world in Twitter that was effective and VITAL to the reporting of the Iranian protests.

That action, compared with it's use to report Breaking Sports news, entertainment news, etc. makes Twitter a valid and important information medium. No matter how others may use it.

Okay, one valid use of Twitter is what happened in Iran. Everything else is pointless drivel and yes I'm including Breaking Sports news in that because there's plenty of other sources for Sports news that are just as accessible.
 
You know, I understand the hate for Twitter, but I don't understand the hate for Twitter. LOL! I mean what's the big deal? If you don't like it, don't use it, that simple.
 
And the sad part about Twitter? People actually spend hours wasting time on a website that offers a totally unnecessary service... a service that could easily be replaced by many of the more accessible forms of media which predated it if people didn't flock to Twitter like sheep because Ashton Kutcher and Ellen DeGeneres said it was cool...

Even worse is how this reflects upon society. We've become so lazy, we can't stand to get our news in anything over 180 characters, and we can't Google search the name of our favorite celebrities to get the latest scoop on them.

Define necessary and unnecessary. Is twitter and less necessary than movies? Or video games? Or TV? Comic Books?

This arrogant view that people that use Twitter are somehow beneath people who are "above" such a medium is obviously absurd. I mean don't comic book fans dislike it when condescending *****bags mock them for that interest? Perhaps this is actually where much of this hate comes from. Comic Book fans (making up a good percentage of the demographic of this forum I guess) now see an avenue where they can turn the tables on the "popular" kids that today enjoy Twitter.

Okay, one valid use of Twitter is what happened in Iran. Everything else is pointless drivel and yes I'm including Breaking Sports news in that because there's plenty of other sources for Sports news that are just as accessible.

But not as quick. Again - the internet in general is FULL of pointless drivel, the minority of the internet is used for anything of real substance.

You know, I understand the hate for Twitter, but I don't understand the hate for Twitter. LOL! I mean what's the big deal? If you don't like it, don't use it, that simple.

Stop being rational.
 
Define necessary and unnecessary. Is twitter and less necessary than movies? Or video games? Or TV? Comic Books?

Yeah, I would say it's more unnecessary than those forms of media. A TV show actually has a written, drawn out story. Far more creative and intellectually stimulating than a 180-character (or less! :wow:) blurb like "@ the mall w/ gina til 4 then going 2 dinner."

This arrogant view that people that use Twitter are somehow beneath people who are "above" such a medium is obviously absurd. I mean don't comic book fans dislike it when condescending *****bags mock them for that interest? Perhaps this is actually where much of this hate comes from. Comic Book fans (making up a good percentage of the demographic of this forum I guess) now see an avenue where they can turn the tables on the "popular" kids that today enjoy Twitter.

Oh you caught us there.. we hate popular people so much we've decided to just blindly bash Twitter to make up for our own insecurities... because none of us can truly think Twitter is an unnecessary, pointless, wholly useless waste of time...
 
But not as quick. Again - the internet in general is FULL of pointless drivel, the minority of the internet is used for anything of real substance.

And the majority of Twitter has real substance? I can go on ESPN and within a minute find the story I'm looking for. Plus I'll probably be able to understand the story better because the author wasn't limited to 180 characters.
 
Define necessary and unnecessary. Is twitter and less necessary than movies? Or video games? Or TV? Comic Books?

This arrogant view that people that use Twitter are somehow beneath people who are "above" such a medium is obviously absurd. I mean don't comic book fans dislike it when condescending *****bags mock them for that interest? Perhaps this is actually where much of this hate comes from. Comic Book fans (making up a good percentage of the demographic of this forum I guess) now see an avenue where they can turn the tables on the "popular" kids that today enjoy Twitter.

I disagree. This is a negative medium that works contrary to the evolution of our language and our culture. It is in effect, making us as a society dumber than ****.

It teaches and promotes microblogging and micromedia. Continually shortening down our language and substance of what we are into something horrible and stupid. Twitter is a misuse of English.

Also I'm not nearly cool enough to have a Twitter and that makes me sad.
 
Not only does it seem a high risk for hacking your twitter account, it also looks like crap.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"