The unREAL DC Boards Lounge 6.7

Status
Not open for further replies.
It bothers me when people think I'm being chauvinistic when it comes to movies because I'll be honest and face the ridicule, I love me a good chick flick.
who doesn't? i love good films from every genre
 
I was watching For Love of the Game last night, which is really a guy's chick flick.
 
The only chick flick I've been able to tolerate recently was "He's Just Not That Into You" and the ending of that movie made me rage. Definitely not my genre.
 
500 Days Of Summer is a guys chick flick

Christian Slater did a chick flick movie called 'Bed Of Roses' with Josh Brolin and Gina Torres in the mid 90s which was alright
 
Last edited:
500 Days Of Summer is overrated?

I think its underrated, its not a movie I thought was held in much high regard
 
500 Days Of Summer is overrated?

I think its underrated, its not a movie I thought was held in much high regard

You need to hang out with some "hipsters" and you'll instantly hate that movie.


Also, if we're talking Christian Slater movies, Untamed Heart is better.
 
The best chick flick ever was The Devil Wears Prada because it was actually basically The Godfather but with fancy clothes instead of the 1940s and cutting remarks instead of actually garroting people.

edit: plus it had a "happy" ending I guess, personally I would have rather it had ended with Anne Hathaway rising up to destroy the enemies of her mentor and embracing her destiny as the God***** of the fashion magazine publishing industry.
 
I can only tolerate Anne Hathaway in small doses

You need to hang out with some "hipsters" and you'll instantly hate that movie.


Also, if we're talking Christian Slater movies, Untamed Heart is better.
Not seen that one.

I like that Christian Slater movie in which he was a skateboarder who teamed up with Tony Hawk and other skaters to avenge the murder of his chinese brother :word:
 
I actually watched 500 days last night and just thought "wow Zooey Deschanel needs to get naked with her sister" it was a good movie but I feel Joesph Gordon Levitts character never actually learns his lesson which is kinda dumb.
 
Fifthfiend said:
edit: plus it had a "happy" ending I guess, personally I would have rather it had ended with Anne Hathaway rising up to destroy the enemies of her mentor and embracing her destiny as the God***** of the fashion magazine publishing industry.

That would have been a better ending for that movie

well that's your opinion and you're entitled to it. you're wrong, but you're entitled to it.

Awwww dont hate Sucker Punch :csad:
 
Exactly, it looks fun.
 
I was talking about hating Sucker Punch, but I can figure out some reason to not watch another 3 Musketeers movie. (Granted, the trailer looks like some of the best cheese.)
 
exactly why i wont watch it lol. i'm already sick of it.

I won't because I can't stand two of the stars of the movie. Namely Zooey Deschanel and her bug eyes. I don't mind that kid from 3rd Rock so much though.
 
There are robots and dragons and sexy ass kicking girls in it

All those things make me :)

It does, but it also has the Wizard of Oz disqualifier in it. Also, it sends the message that going even more insane is a good way to escape an insane asylum.
 
Just because hipsters like the movie dosn't mean I'm not going too.

I actually watched 500 days last night and just thought "wow Zooey Deschanel needs to get naked with her sister" it was a good movie but I feel Joesph Gordon Levitts character never actually learns his lesson which is kinda dumb.
I could watch Zooey Deschanel saucer eyed cuteness forever. I'm not all that into her sister.

I think the point is his character is a naive hopeless romantic and he can't really change.

Too be fair in most chick flick romantic comedies the female characters act act exactly like he does except they get the guy.


post it dawg

Ask and you shall recieve :woot:

VOICES FROM KRYPTON: Were you surprised by people’s reaction to the film?

BRYAN SINGER: It’s hard for me to assess it. My gut response is, “It didn’t do THAT bad.” You know, summer’s a tricky time – I know it’s hard to blame the time, but there’s a bit of an expectation for a summer movie. I think that Superman Returns was a bit nostalgic and romantic, and I don’t think that was what people were expecting, especially in the summer. What I had noticed is that there weren’t a lot of women lining up to see a comic book movie, but they were going to line up to see The Devil Wears Prada, which may have been something I wanted to address. But when you’re making a movie, you’re not thinking about that stuff, you’re thinking, “Wow, I want to make a romantic movie that harkens back to the Richard Donner movie that I loved so much.” And that’s what I did…

VOICES FROM KRYPTON: But focusing on the romantic side of things, especially in a superhero movie, is NOT what people would have expected from you.

BRYAN SINGER: Right, because I was known for the X-Men Pictures, which had been more realistic and edgier. That I think was a big piece of what it was. Plus you had that complicated relationship between the Richard White character and Lois Lane that might have thrown people off. Quentin Tarantino and I had a big conversation about it — he has a fascination with this film and he wrote this whole essay about it, but the Lois Lane part of it has always been a stickler with him. This is me extrapolating, but the relationship in the Donner film was so black and white and here it was complex. Adding to that, of course, was the child that was involved. Again, I really do think I was making the film for that Devil Wears Prada audience of women who wouldn’t normally come to a superhero film.

That’s a tricky thing when you’ve built an audience that likes your comic book films and you deliver a certain tone, and then you bring this completely different tone to them…. You know, I haven’t really talked about this in depth, so I’m just thinking about this off the fly. It’s hard, because I’m proud of it for what it is. I mean, there are a bunch of movies I’ve made where I’m, like, “Yuck, that was weak” or “That could’ve been better,” and I can see why. But with Superman Returns…. If I could go back, I would have tightened the first act. Maybe open with the plane or something.

QUESTION: Truthfully, as much as I love Superman: The Movie, it felt like maybe you were paying too much of an homage to it and Richard Donner.

BRYAN SINGER: Oh, absolutely. What’s interesting is that people know I’m a big Trekkie, and they’re always saying, “Why don’t you do a Star Trek?” and I say, “You know, I think I’m TOO big a fan of Star Trek. You’d feel like you were watching Wrath of Khan again." So with Superman, again, it was romantic and nostalgic and NOT a high octane summer movie like Transformers or something like that. I think people would’ve wanted that from me, knowing what I did with the X-Men, where I shed all the comic-ness and tried to make it real. Here, though, I embraced the comic-ness and made this alternate, bucolic Metropolis. Then there was the music and the whole thing. But I am very much in love with the Donner picture, and for me the journey was exciting because I got the chance to reprise those images and explore it. When you’re fascinated by something and you love it, part of making the movie is trying to please everyone and make a successful movie, but part of it is an experimental kind of thing.

QUESTION: One final point I’d like to make is the fact that Luthor stabs and nearly kills Superman, but it seemed wrong to me that the two characters never came back together again; that there was no comeuppance for Luthor.

BRYAN SINGER: I’ve always felt that the origin of Superman is the story of Moses – the child sent on a ship to fulfill a destiny. And this was a story about Christ – it’s all about sacrifice: “The world, I hear their cries.” So what happens? He gets the knife in the side and later he falls to the earth in the shape of a crucifix. It was kind of nailing you on the head, but I enjoyed that, because I’ve always found the myth of Christ compelling and moving. So I hoped to do my own take, which is heavy **** for a summer movie. But definitely the nostalgic, romantic aspects of it worked against people’s expectations of it in the climate. And if I was going to do another one, it would be a reboot. I would go back and redo the original, but I only thought of that recently. It would be a much less romantic, more balls-to-the-wall action movie. It would be a very different pace than Superman Returns, which I can say at this point because I have distance from it now.
 
It does, but it also has the Wizard of Oz disqualifier in it. Also, it sends the message that going even more insane is a good way to escape an insane asylum.

Its like Return To Oz if directed by a Playstation console come to life that had known nothing of the world except Japanese Anime and Micheal Bay movies
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"