I'm still cautiously optimistic about Rock/Cena II. They've learned from last year's mistakes, and if they concentrate on ring psychology instead of athleticism, they might pull off something close to Rock/Hogan or Hogan/Andre.
I don't think it'll have anywhere near the "feel" or the epicness of Rock/Hogan or Hogan/Andre. Thats what made those matches work. The ingredients and buildup just aren't there for that in Rock/Cena II even though it will probably be mechanically better than both. Rock/Hogan had the benefit of being a first time generational icon vs icon dream match.
Hogan/Andre...while not being a new matchup was riding high on the sucess of WWE at the time and had a fantastic build along with that same icon vs icon flavor. Hogan was hugely over and Andre had an awesome monster image. It created huge anticipation to see those two titans collide. Most of the work in Hogan vs Andre was done before the bell even rang.
I think you're right though. Rock/Cena II could be better than Rock/Cena I because they at least have that match to look back on and see how they can make improvments.
I don't expect it to be amazing or live up to the hype WWE is pushing but it could be an improvment of some kind. Just not what it should be on every level that it should be. Rock's done nothing spectacular to make the title really matter in this like it should and the build up so far has been "meh." They'd have to do a complete creative 180 in a month.
Originally Posted by the_ultimate_evil
nope sorry gonna call it now its gonna suck harder than and experienced porn star.
the only way they can make this even half way decent, is to test the waters. like i've said before play up the idea cena can't beat rock, no matter what he tries rock wont stay down and start to show a more darker brutal side to cena.
it can lead to him changing to heel or even just gaining an edge
i'll say it again rock/cena will suck unless they look to something like mania 17 for a blue print
I don't think it'll be THAT terrible but I don't think it'll be anything special. Chances are it will be yet another underwhelming Mania main event.
You're right a Cena heel turn would spice things it but its just a shame that in your scenario Cena yet again has to look like a chump in the ring against Rock.
Mania 17's turn by Austin isn't exactly seen as a universal favorite or sucess. Its still controversial. The basic idea of the Hogan turn in 96 makes more sense for Cena. The explanation is already there. Cena busts his a** but half the fans he works hard to entertain still boo him. Meanwhile a part timer like Rock who left years ago gets met with big cheers. Thats a believable reason for Cena to feel slighted byt he fans and thus turn his back on them becoming an angry bigger badass heel who puts others down with scathing insults a bit like the old heel Cena used to.
Cenas turn would never be as sucessful as Hogans but some of the same rules and ideas apply right now. If Cena gets booed to hell in the main event and Rock gets cheered that writes out the exlapantion for any heel turn WWE might want to do during or after the match in a simple and understandable way. Then again they both might get booed but it still works on Cenas end of things.
Originally Posted by Parker Wayne
I love how the internet keeps saying that Kane is ridiculous now and some say he sucked since he took mask. I disagree, especially when you consider that Kane did some pretty ridiculous and funny stuff before he took off mask, or did the internet decide to forget about when he was teaming with X-Pac or any of the Drew Carey or Pete Rose stuff?
If anything, fans should be pissed that WWF let him speak when he started teaming with X-Pac.
I agree. Ridiculous...NOW? Where have thes people been for the last decade? Kanes been hnded ridiculous stuff to do for years. Nothing he's done since putting the mask back on is as bad as some of the sh** WWE had him do in the past before he took it off the first time or after.
May 19th? Kane vs fake Kane? The feuds with Khali? Kane trying to rescue kidnapped Paul Bearer from Edge? Hell this stuff Kanes doing now is QUALITY compared to the Katie Vick storyline.
Originally Posted by Antman
Glenn Jacobs has gotten raw a deal from WWE over his career. Is their a character that has been in more garbage storylines than Kane?
Of all the guys in WWE now? Nope. Kanes been there so long that he's got to take the prize for the most crappy stories. Mark Henry is one guy thats a close second though. I think Mizzark has maybe had worse storylines but Kane has had more bad ones.
Either way you're right. For a guy as talented as he is Kanes been handed more sh** storylines from creative than just about anyone on is level in the last 15 years. Kane has always been at the very least dependable as a talent. Always solid. Its creative thats dropped the ball time and time again.
The Shield must on Piper's Pit so that Ambrose and Piper can have a verbal exchange.
This...this needs to happen. The very thought of it gets my anticipation up. A Pit like that could be great television.
Originally Posted by Parker Wayne
And he always manages to still stay popular with fans. I actually love that Kane can go from funny to f**king scary like nothing and most people usually accept it. Who else can go from intimidating the Undertaker to being associated with DX to taking out 8-9 to you-know-the-woman to Being a monster after being unmasked to Anger Management classes?
My point is that Kane has never been really consistently and that people (not anyone specific in this thread) need to stop thinking he was in the attitude era.
Kane's always been pretty consistent in the ring its just that like Antman said he's a magnet for *****ty material from the creative team. They have no idea how to write good stuff for him most of the time. If anything Kane is too loyal and dependable a talent. If it were me I'd throw those sh** ideas back in creative's faces. Kane just takes 'em and tries to make the best of them seemingly without making much of a fuss.
Originally Posted by DarthSkywalker
Last year was their chance to do that. They had the crowd, they had the honest question of who was going to win and they had the build up.
This year's match could be better, hard to see how it could be worse, but it won't have the heat of significance of last year's.
Agreed. The novelty of the matchup is gone now. Like you said last year it was much more special but now everyone has an idea of what to expect. WWE creative isn't helping with much of a big buildup so far either.