Anita18
DANCE FOR ME, FUNNY MAN!
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 25,882
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 58
I just saw BB in its entirety for the first time in about a year (I've seen it many, many times before, though) and I see his points.Getting back on-topic, when I was re-reading the Total Film review of "Batman Begins", I thought they did a good job of highlighting a flaw others on here have expressed with the film:
"The director is less comfortable with the third acts pre-requisite set-pieces, which suffer slightly, unusually, because of the strength of character and story that precede them. Most summer blockbusters expect spectacular action sequences to distract and amuse an audience bored by the talky bits. Bales Batman is so compelling and the supporting cast (Neeson, Morgan Freeman, Rutger Hauer) so emotionally engaging that no effects-laden high-speed smackdown can quite equal the frisson of two people talking. Similarly, an increase in flippancy  making Gary Oldmans world-weary Sergeant Gordon ultimately a touch clownish  feels like a forced concession to blockbuster rules."
I think the wording of this criticism does a good job of alluding to one problem with the film - the fact that it sits somewhat uncomfortably with its summer blockbuster status. Some elements fit better than others, and I'm glad they picked out the Gordon comedy stuff, which I think felt especially tacked on. It was like "I'm no rat" Gordon and Batmobile-driving Gordon were two different characters.
Actually, my favorite parts were with Bruce putting together Batman, and early Batman, when he's got a purpose. (And any Gordon-Batman conversations are
 ) Lost college-age Bruce was not as convincing for me, and some of the lines that mentioned "fear" could have been cut without a huge effect on the film, especially since I didn't quite follow their reasoning either. It seemed that fear was related to everything in that film, and I didn't agree exactly.
 ) Lost college-age Bruce was not as convincing for me, and some of the lines that mentioned "fear" could have been cut without a huge effect on the film, especially since I didn't quite follow their reasoning either. It seemed that fear was related to everything in that film, and I didn't agree exactly.The characterization of Gordon didn't stick out badly for me - when he's driving the Tumbler, he acts as if he's gotten himself a bit over his head, and that's a reaction that I totally buy from even a world-weary Gordon. It could have come off a lot worse, but Gary Oldman does what Gary Oldman does best.

It's hard to tell when the third act unravels, at least for me. I loved the Year One reference with the bat swarm, but then somewhere between the Tumbler chase and the Ra's reveal, it gets lost in the "summer blockbuster" genre. It's like they had to bring the giant explosions back and not explain some of the little holes in Bruce's actions. I wasn't really convinced that Batman would depend wholly on Gordon for his plan to work. And why not turn off that damn microwave emitter before you launch yourself into a fight? Plus, what's with destroying that toll booth at the end of the Tumbler chase?
 Those kinds of things bring it down into "brainless summer blockbuster" genre, IMO. It could have been a lot smarter while keeping the explodey. The good bits are so good though, that they outweigh any of the eh moments.
 Those kinds of things bring it down into "brainless summer blockbuster" genre, IMO. It could have been a lot smarter while keeping the explodey. The good bits are so good though, that they outweigh any of the eh moments.I guess I'm just weird though, in favoring the second act over the first and the third.
 Hopefully TDK will be like BB's second act, when Batman's doing his thing.
 Hopefully TDK will be like BB's second act, when Batman's doing his thing. 
 
				 
						 
 
		 
 
		 
	
 
 
		 All of the Arkham inmates are still loose running around, and Falcone is gone, leaving a power vacuum, which is something TDK's ARG is definitely alluding to. For me, BB didn't exactly end at all, but the film did a wonderful job in having a conclusion while leaving so many possibilities open.
 All of the Arkham inmates are still loose running around, and Falcone is gone, leaving a power vacuum, which is something TDK's ARG is definitely alluding to. For me, BB didn't exactly end at all, but the film did a wonderful job in having a conclusion while leaving so many possibilities open. 
 
		


 
 
		 
 
		 
  
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		