We're not talking about sexual pursuasion. We're talking about a study that Bruce Wayne is known for in the comics... it'd be in character for him to take up an interest in criminals in teenage years, early adulthood. While it's never stated explicitly in BB, it remains a probability.
Nolan can credibly state in either of the next two films, that Bruce has knowledge of basic forensics (for instance) from his early years... without it actually being a major retcon.
Exactly. This is what I've been arguing for the past 3 years. I think there are enough gaps in the 7 (right?) years Bruce disappeared from Gotham to fill anything in, and it wouldn't contradict anything we saw in
Begins.
Even though it was an origin story, the movie glossed over a lot of that training/exploration period. It did so because it was focusing mainly on the story within that story - Bruce's relationship with Ra's. Most of what we see is his time with Ra's, but obviously there was a lot more to it prior to their meeting. It's explicitly referenced in that Bruce already knows several styles of martial arts when he meets Ra's.
Now, one can argue whether or not it was a wise decision on Nolan's part to gloss over the rest of his training years, but that's a different argument. The fact is that there is more evidence to suggest that he had more extensive training beyond Ra's than there is to suggest that he didn't.
And that includes sleuthing skills and maybe even some chemistry (before we get into the "then why did Fox have to make the antidote?" argument, the answer is because Bruce was...wait for it...unconscious for 2 days, and then busy out as Batman?..) - even though the "It was some kind of hallucinogen, weaponized in aerosol form" seems pretty elementary, it was obviously included to show that he isn't a complete buffoon in these areas.
Like I said, you can argue whether Nolan did justice to these facets of the character or just glossed over them, but it's hard to deny that they are indeed a part of the filmic character, whether they are displayed enough onscreen or not.
(Which brings me to one of the ultimate ironies of fan reaction to this film - there's so much bile against this film in regards to two subjects - "lack of detecting" and "lack of subtlety - it bashes you over the head repeatedly".
It's funny because one of the elements Nolan
didn't bash over our skulls was his detective skills, which are clearly illustrated at certain points throughout without being so in your face; they require a more discerning eye and at least a basic knowledge of Batman. But because of this, some people claim that they simply are not there.