kedrell
Fork&SpoonOperator
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Messages
- 21,379
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 33
[A];17128117 said:I think he was only talking about quality, not BO
They're inseperable for a film this size.
[A];17128117 said:I think he was only talking about quality, not BO
I dont understand why people smoke cigarettes. If you smoke, congrats on the slowly killing yourself and everyone around you thing.![]()
Ok but if we did that his question would've gone a little something like this, ''I don't understand why people want the institution of marriage rather than simply accepting civil union benefits.'' See the difference.I don't understand why people call them "gays" instead of "people", like they're a different species or something.
. Unless people just like the way the inside of a church looks.If someone wants to kill themselves, they can go right ahead, just don't get any of your crappy nasty smoke smell on me.I dont understand why people smoke cigarettes. If you smoke, congrats on the slowly killing yourself and everyone around you thing.![]()
I don't understand why people thought Transformers was gonna be some kind of great epic. I hate to break it to you, but the original cartoon wasn't that good either.
The point is (at least my point was) that Hollywood has a tendency to not take movies such as those based on toy lines, video games and comic books seriously. Their newfound respect for comic book properties is a step in the right direction, but it's still a new concept in a genre that's been around for a while. I just don't understand how some fans can't see that a movie like G.I. Joe isn't going to be taken seriously as anything other than a popcorn action flick. Mind you, I'm not saying that there's no way to make a deep, compelling G.I. Joe film, just that Hollywood won't do it.
Talking about Transformers: I love popcorn action flicks, but I don't need a bad sex joke every 4 mins and dogs humping.
[A];17128671 said:I don't about an Oscar caliber story but action movies are not as good as they used to be..
[A];17128671 said:I don't about an Oscar caliber story but action movies are not as good as they used to be..

We get that. And I understand we can't get 2 hours of it because it'd be way too expensive (and boring, probably) -- but why fill the rest of the movie with crude humor, stupid unfunny jokes and slow-motion breast-swinging to keep wankers happy..?There are those people who seem to be expecting that, yes. Myself and a lot of others just wanted to see the robots we love punching and shooting each other in the face.
That's what I meant: old ones = better. By the way, the Bourne trilogy kick assYou comparing today's movies to the Stallone/Schwarzenegger/VanDamme/Segal days? Cuz I sure as hell miss those. The Rock, Matt Damon, and Vin Diesel aren't cuttin' it![]()

[A];17128688 said:We get that. And I understand we can't get 2 hours of it because it'd be way too expensive (and boring, probably) -- but why fill the rest of the movie with crude humor, stupid unfunny jokes and slow-motion breast-swinging to keep wankers happy..?
Agreed on the cost issue though.[A];17128691 said:That's what I meant: old ones = better. By the way, the Bourne trilogy kick ass![]()

I bet the guys from Los Santos love themI said the robots we love. Who loves Skids, Mudflap, and Wheelie?Agreed on the cost issue though

There are those people who seem to be expecting that, yes. Myself and a lot of others just wanted to see the robots we love punching and shooting each other in the face.
