Herolee10
No More Miracles
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 30,204
- Reaction score
- 6,773
- Points
- 103
Between having him sacrifice himself in AEG or him having future adventures in the MCU I’ll choose the second option, any day of the week...
Some people not knowing how Marvel could “redeem” the character after AEG is plain stupidity. The table is set once again for the character to have a strong comeback. I mean come on now, stop whining... it’s not that difficult to make things turn around for the better.
The short sightedness for some is just sad and unbearable. Thor is now basically the only OG avenger left on the table and with even more movies and adventures his future sacrifice will have to be handled very well because the character will have been the remainder corner stone of the MCU but also the linchpin between the old and new.
At this point in time Thor is no less than the most important character in the MCU moving forward. The most layered, the one with the biggest history...
But what would be the point of it all? Are we gonna see Thor make a comeback again like he did in "Ragnarok" only for him to go through another character assassination like in "Endgame"?
And even though Thor may potentially have more stories to tell, keep in mins that "Endgame" was still supposed to serve as a finale for the Infinity Saga. There was no sense of closure to Thor's role and he bowed out as a failure. If everyone's defense to Thor's portrayal in "Endgame" is because he has more stories to tell then that is a poor excuse. I really doubt that Marvel will ever be able to reproduce the level of success and hype that "Endgame" achieved and to think that Thor will be cemented in that historic film as a fat failure is depressing.
Why should people care or invest in a character that always loses? That will never win the big one? At this point in time, we have the likes of Ant-Man and Hawkeye who did more in saving the universe than Thor did. It cannot really be stressed enough on how much of a failure he is.