Ronny Shade said:
I think vampires are a not good idea in Batman.
Other original bat-world superpowered villains are fine, but no vampires.
Don't get me wrong, I love vampires, but one of 2 things will happen: Either they will be "explained" in the "realistic" Nolan-verse, thus making them a disease or something else dumb (one of many fatal mistakes of Blade 3), or they will be mystical and not meld well with the milieu Begins has set for us.
Thus I vote NO on the Monk.
plus I've never heard of him before
The Monk resurfaced in the early 80's, where he was explained as a Lousiana plantation owner who had an incestuous relationship with his sister... he treated his slaves bad and they put a voodoo curse on him that turned him into a vampire. He bit his sister and the two of them were immortally incestuous, and, in the 80's when they clashed, he infected Batman... and, I think, an adult Dick Grayson.
Anyway, a priest shows up and helps cure Batman.
But... okay... here we go.
1.) I don't like the idea of the supernatural in Batman's world.
2.) I am not opposed to the Monk appearing in a Batman movie.
3.) I do not want to see vampirism made a disease.
I believe that the Monk could be played as a crazy emo guy who just WANTS to be a vampire and drinks blood. They're out there. Maybe this crazy emo guy is a serial killer or, something, and... as happened in the original monk story - he kidnaps Batman's girlfriend and Batman has to track him down and smack him around.
Emo guys need to be beaten. When I am president, this shall be law.