or "Iron Man 3's Mandarin twist ruined a perfectly fine movie because I've been a massive Mandarin fan of his sinceforevernever."
I liked Elysium but I was expecting it to be more epic. It felt like it should have been longer and everything needed more development.
Also, I hate to say this, but Jodie Foster was not good. She just wasn't.
You didn't even need to be a Mandarin fan. You have Trailers that constantly hype the Mandarin as this badass villain, and in the end he's some random drug addict.
You didn't even need to be a Mandarin fan. You have Trailers that constantly hype the Mandarin as this badass villain, and in the end he's some random drug addict.
I didn't have an issue with that. They cloned the first biological being they came into contact with.
The only one that's really disappointed me so far is This is the End, although I haven't seen too many movies this year, have a bunch Netflix'd. I just felt This is the End dragged in the middle, the first hour is great and the ending when they almost all get raptured is fun too, but it could've easily cut 15-20 minutes or kill some people off more slowly.
As for the two biggest movies on this list I've seen Iron Man 3 and Man of Steel. I liked Iron Man 3, it wasn't what I expected, but it was good, liked seeing Tony deal with Avengers PTSD and thought the Mandarin twist was great, the ending destroying all the suits and fixing his heart was cool, we know he'll be back with even better armor, but the "security blanket" armor is gone. I loved Man of Steel, thought it was amazing, everything about it worked. People *****ing and moaning about the ultra violence, it's a movie about the most overpowered character ever, also the destruction was on par with last years Avengers, if superheroes were real and fighting in the city, it'd would get decimated. I don't know, I rank it on par with Donner's Superman 1, that movie may have had more heart, more Synder's actually gave us a credible villain.
I loved Man of Steel, thought it was amazing, everything about it worked. People *****ing and moaning about the ultra violence, it's a movie about the most overpowered character ever, also the destruction was on par with last years Avengers, if superheroes were real and fighting in the city, it'd would get decimated. I don't know, I rank it on par with Donner's Superman 1, that movie may have had more heart, more Synder's actually gave us a credible villain.
On par with The Avengers? I don't even think the death and destruction there were as bad as 9/11, while The Man of Steel's destruction was some 10 times worse.
It seems like not one citizen died in The Avengers. Man of Steel had actual consequence and 95% of the destruction happened before Superman got to Metropolis so I most certainly do not understand the complaints.
I wasn't even a major fan of The Avengers and have to agree on it being a popocorn flick, but the rest just makes me laughThat may be true, but I still didn't feel like The Avengers had the heart and soul that MOS did. Don't get me wrong; I really enjoyed TA. But overall, it just felt like a great popcorn flick. At least for me, MOS was a popcorn flick with many more emotional highs and lows and the first real character study we've gotten on Kal El since Superman '78.