A new (and much better drawn) image of the initial 5 Autobts.
From left to right (the vehicles on the bottom), by no means accurate. Just best guess/rumour. Ratchet, Prowl (yes he has a wheels instead of legs almost like Gizmoduck), Prime, Bumblebee, and Bulkhead.
Source
You call that better????????????
Someone claimed he was Bulkhead. I looked at the pic and though Ironhide, someone else though Hound.ChibiKiriyama said:Why the heck is Bulkhead in the starting lineup?
This has about as much to do with G1 as RiD or the unicron trilogy. It's a new continuity.ChibiKiriyama said:2 G1 disappointments in one year. What are the odds?2 G1 disappointments in one year. What are the odds?
This show, like G1, is using the toys as a start point to make the animation models. RiD animation models are near exact replications of the toys.Nathan said:Yeah, honestly. How did they get from this, to that new deformed crap?
A new (and much better drawn) image of the initial 5 Autobts.
From left to right (the vehicles on the bottom), by no means accurate. Just best guess/rumour. Ratchet, Prowl (yes he has a wheels instead of legs almost like Gizmoduck), Prime, Bumblebee, and Bulkhead.
Source
This must be hasbro's way of saying "well if you think the movie designs are crap you aint seen nothing yet". They better have a decent plot to go along with this because things are not looking good and the show hasn't even started yet.
I just hope they didn't get Cullen to work on this. I wouldn't want him to be associated with such crap.
Did you know they don't show them transforming? They spin into transformation like taz spins.
This has about as much to do with G1 as RiD or the unicron trilogy. It's a new continuity.
This show, like G1, is using the toys as a start point to make the animation models. RiD animation models are near exact replications of the toys.
Oh c'mon, that's the dumbest complaint ever. Did you cry fowl when FOX created Batman: The Animated Series. I mean it was animated and a series...I can't imagine how bad the toys will look.
And why is it called Transformers: ANIMATED??? Well no duh that it's animated.
It's like calling the movie, Tranformers: Live Action.
That better be some kind of joke.Did you know they don't show them transforming? They spin into transformation like taz spins.
Oh c'mon, that's the dumbest complaint ever. Did you cry fowl when FOX created Batman: The Animated Series. I mean it was animated and a series...
That better be some kind of joke.
(Although the idea of non "Transforming" Transformers has been used twice to date.)
As I say, I don't know if I really have a problem with that. I mean that's kind of nitpicky.Well if it was called Transformers: The Animated Series, it would have a better ring to it, instead of Transformers: Animated.
That I have a problem with. At least in Beast Machines the "Transformations" weren't treated in a silly manner.No joke. It's confirmed.
As I say, I don't know if I really have a problem with that. I mean that's kind of nitpicky.
That I have a problem with. At least in Beast Machines the "Transformations" weren't treated in a silly manner.