Revenge of the Fallen Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen news,info, etc thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So when they do name him Devastator, they'll be two?

Even if they named him "Devastator" in the first film, it was still a mistake. He was meant to be Brawl from the very beginning. Even with the Search of Starscream comics, his name is Brawl.
 
So when they do name him Devastator, they'll be two?

Obviously.

Even if they named him "Devastator" in the first film, it was still a mistake.

As I said before it was no mistake.

He was meant to be Brawl from the very beginning.

That depends on how you believe trully has character nameing rights in the film.

Hasbro wanted he to be called Brawl.

The writters wanted him to be called Brawl.

Mike Bay wanted to name him Devastator.

Guess who got what he wanted:shock

Even with the Search of Starscream comics, his name is Brawl.

Search of Starscream????Dont you mean Reigin of Starscream????

And either way thats irrelivent since that book was a sequil...meaning it took place after the film.

In the novel adaptation of the film he was called Devastator...and that came out before the film.

He was also called Devestator in the prequel comics of the first film.
 
Last edited:
As I said before it was no mistake.

It was a mistake, Orci even called it a mistake.

Bay is just a bit dumb-downed when it comes to Transformers.


That depends on how you believe trully has character nameing rights in the film.

Hasbro wanted he to be called Brawl.

The writters wanted him to be called Brawl.

Mike Bay wanted to name him Devastator.

Guess who got what he wanted:shock

Exactly, everyone wanted him to be Brawl, and Bay called him Devastator, and the only reason being "Brawl didn't sound evil enough."

And that's why I still call him Brawl, just because Devastator will most likely be used in the sequel. I won't be calling him Devastator Deux.


Search of Starscream????Dont you mean Reigin of Starscream????

And either way thats irrelivent since that book was a sequil...meaning it took place after the film.

In the novel adaptation of the film he was called Devastator...and that came out before the film.

He was also called Devestator in the prequel comics of the first film.

Yah, Reign of Starscream, my bad.

I never read the novel adaptation, because the novel adaptation of a film makes no sense to even read.

Besides, that's your opinion though, you can call him Devastator, I'll just still call him Brawl. He's Brawl to me, Devastator is the combination of six or seven Constructicons. Which will be in Revenge of the Fallen.

Bay should just do the wisest thing and edit his name to be called Brawl in the first film. As the writers WROTE for the screenplay/story.
 
Last edited:
Obviously?

Yes obviously.

If there was a Devastator in the first film and a different 1 in the 2nd film you now have 2 characters by the name of Devastator.

It was a mistake, Orci even called it a mistake.

It was not a mistake.Bay said he perfered the name Devastator and wanted to use the name for the character.

He got what he wanted..

Bay is just a bit dumb-down when it comes to Transformers.

How does that matter.He prior knowlidge of TF's has nothing to do with it.

He thought the name sounded better so he used it.Thats deliberate....not a mistake.

Exactly, everyone wanted him to be Brawl, and Bay called him Devastator, and the only reason being "Brawl didn't sound evil enough."

Thanks for proving it wasnt a mistake.:applaud

And that's why I still call him Brawl, just because Devastator will most likely be used in the sequel. I won't be calling him Devastator Deux.

Thats fine if thats what you want to do....but it doesnt make it accurate.

Yah, Reign of Starscream, my bad.

No biggie

I never read the novel adaptation, because the novel adaptation of a film makes no sense to even read.

Why is that???

Besides, that's your opinion though, you can call him Devastator

Its not my opinion....its the name used in the film....thats called a fact not an opinion.

, I'll just still call him Brawl. He's Brawl to me, Devastator is the combination of six or seven Constructicons. Which will be in Revenge of the Fallen.

kool

Bay should just do the wisest thing and edit his name to be called Brawl in the first film. As the writers WROTE for the screenplay/story.

He refused to do so for the DVD release....I doubt he ever will.
 
So basically this is about Bay getting what he wants instead of staying true to the transformers lore when it comes to names.
 
Just about nothing in these movies are true to Transformer lore, Bayformers is just a re-imaging of the G1 cartoon, accept for the Fallen whom was only a Comic book charater.
 
Yes obviously.

If there was a Devastator in the first film and a different 1 in the 2nd film you now have 2 characters by the name of Devastator.



It was not a mistake.Bay said he perfered the name Devastator and wanted to use the name for the character.

He got what he wanted..



How does that matter.He prior knowlidge of TF's has nothing to do with it.

He thought the name sounded better so he used it.Thats deliberate....not a mistake.



Thanks for proving it wasnt a mistake.:applaud



Thats fine if thats what you want to do....but it doesnt make it accurate.



No biggie



Why is that???



Its not my opinion....its the name used in the film....thats called a fact not an opinion.



kool



He refused to do so for the DVD release....I doubt he ever will.

Everyone and their mother calls him Brawl except for Bay and you.
 
Meh if the mood strikes me I might slip in Devastator as well.

/shrugs
 
So basically this is about Bay getting what he wants instead of staying true to the transformers lore when it comes to names.

I would say thats pretty much on the ball.

Just look at what he's doing to Megatron in the 2nd film.When has Megatron willing followed an other???

Much less worshiped him????

Just about nothing in these movies are true to Transformer lore, Bayformers is just a re-imaging of the G1 cartoon, accept for the Fallen whom was only a Comic book charater.

And even then Bay is making changes.

Everyone and their mother calls him Brawl except for Bay and you.

I dont care what other fans call him.

To me what matters is what name was used in the film.


Meh if the mood strikes me I might slip in Devastator as well.

/shrugs

And you are part of everyone and their mother:whatever:
 
the way i see it, "brawl" is the name that most of the hardcore fans call him, and "that tank guy" is the name that most of the casual movie fans call him. end of story. if they explain why there are 2 devastators that's what i'll call him. devastator. but until than, he's brawl to me. end of that story.
 
Last edited:
I just don't get it why most of you accept the fact that it was mistake and at the same time you believe in that mistake and sound like it isn't.
 
I just don't get it why most of you accept the fact that it was mistake and at the same time you believe in that mistake and sound like it isn't.

it was a mistake in the fact that his name was originally intended to be brawl. it wasn't a mistake in that micheal bay changed it to devastator on purpose. so it's no wonder so many people get confused.
 
there is more than one person named Bill in the world....maybe they take Devastators/Brawls spark and disperse it to the Constructicons....
 
^^ And that should end the conversation :)

I'm tired of arguing with people that think they will always be right though.
 
^LOL

Michael Bay: I think i will call devastator Galvatron instead for revenge of the fallen because it sounds cooler, ah well MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY. :hehe:
 
You just did.

No arguing over that would be questioning your reasons for saying that and then refuting it.

You might want to look up the defintion of the word "argument".

I'm tired of arguing with people that think they will always be right though.

I assume that comment was directed at me.

And is so, I dont think I'm always right.I just happen to be right in this case.
 
No arguing over that would be questioning your reasons for saying that and then refuting it.

You might want to look up the defintion of the word "argument".



I assume that comment was directed at me.

And is so, I dont think I'm always right.I just happen to be right in this case.

but that's kinda what you did though? isn't it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"