TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,857
- Reaction score
- 15,083
- Points
- 103
Joseph Gordon Levitt is a known name.
No idea who this guy is, but sounds reasonable.
WB still has AOT which could be more...palatable.
Please God no.WB still has AOT which could be more...palatable.
WB still has AOT which could be more...palatable.
I'm still sticking with this feeling.For me Akira is like in the same category of John Carter in that much of what they have to show has been seen elsewhere in other properties due to the age of the story. So, I’m just curious how they market this film. I can see how casting can be used to help with that.
No idea who this guy is, but sounds reasonable.
The project had been on the rocks for weeks, with word in town that it is a difficult film to cast ethnically at its high budget, in this moment of political correctness.
Difference is, Mulan is family friendly movie that will probably appeal to the widest possible audience and likely rake in a boat load of Chinese cash. That’s forgetting about merchandising.They kinda look iffy after that Mulan teaser tho. Regardless of how accurate it is to the cartoon version or the original tale, Disney went all out and was like, we making this thing more Asian than the bay area.
Difference is, Mulan is family friendly movie that will probably appeal to the widest possible audience and likely rake in a boat load of Chinese cash. That’s forgetting about merchandising.
Akira is an R rated dystopian future with heavy psychological and body horror elements that would require a budget on par with the best of the Star Wars/DC/Marvel pictures of today. Unlike those films however, this really isn’t going to be everyone’s cup of tea.
Obviously I’d like them to take the chance, but I can see the logic behind their trepidation and why something like Mulan is a different kettle of fish.
Netflix can afford it but the question is would they be willing to. They dont want another Marco Polo.