Of course they have they're flaws, alls I am saying is that for pure action they are fine, solid movies
and what more is it you would like to know about Stathams character? what more do we need to know abou frank martin to make the movie work is what i am asking, i think we know enough about him to make the movie work, we get a tiny peek into his past with one how he doesn't want to risk his life to help someone in need cause he spent part of his life already doing that and he didn't want to do it again, and then he becomes subject to change once he finds out the real dealings going on, so that makes him a round character, albeit a lamer round character. But what more do you want really
some one a couple posts back said the Rundown is the best action movie of this century, I don't nessecarliy think he is wrong, but its not like the Rock's character in that movie is this deep layerd character, nor does he have to be to make the movie work
John Mcclaine isn't this deep character ether, he is the same in everymovie tough New York city cop, who doesn't want any trouble but will give you some if you ask
the question was asked what happened to good ol action movies of the 80's, die hard is one of them, I love die hard, and the Transporter shares many of the same qualities that make die hard awesome, its not better, but if we are talking about visceral action the transporter movies are in the same league with any of the good ones made this century
BUt then you look back and your like this is utter crap, and as such I've stayed clean for some years 
t:
