DV8 said:I need way more Joker than that . . . not necessarily 'screen time' . . . cuz one of the greatest movie villains of all time . . . John Doe in S7VEN, had a minimal amount of screen time, but was present throughout the film as the major threat . . .
but we don't have all the Batman origin build up in this one, so that leaves room for enough/more Joker . . .
Rynan said:I see this my mind's eye:
![]()
Kill her dammit! ****in kill her dead dammit! The Joker ****in needs to ****in kill her ****in dead! With fire and a ****ing crowbar, dammit! Why the hell doesn't Nolan ****in listen to me, dammit! Mother ****er! She should be a dead *****! Dammit! *******s!
Clerk said:I'm thinking the reduced screentime thing is no problem. You guys remember Batman The Long Halloween? Joker was in it like 3 times, and in just those three times they managed to make him crucial to the story while at the same time pleasing the reader. No worries.
Babs Gordon said:so my point was that let joker have all kinds of attention in the second movie... but keep him a wraith. we don't need to see him for him to be part of the plot. by role i really meant actual screen time.
but really we should save the screen time for #3.
Babs Gordon said:lol the only problem that i can see with that is that-- sure, in the comics she doesn't even exist. but most of the people who will see begins will never have picked up a batman comic, sad to say. they'll be going "what the hell happened to that chick" because her role was more significant than most of us would like to admit, at least with regard to the amount of attention she was given as a character. to kill her off just like that would be careless storytelling. i'm not saying she can't die, but at least give it a little more attention then "oh yeah... she died" somewhere in between.
Rynan said:Actually, I was making fun of how many times I heard the "Kill Racheal" slogan. It's quite annoying.
Dark Knight said:i'm not talking about careless storytelling because I consider Chris Nolan a VERY good storyteller.......![]()
Mr. Socko said:I agree, but a story with very little Joker, is not a story I'll like.
Dark Knight said:yeah...but i seriously don't think we will have to worry about that. At the end of Jetts report....he says "the Joker role certainly NOT be a cameo type of role." It'll be a strong supporting role.....plus remember....the focus should still remain on Bales Bruce Wayne/Batman.
Rynan said:Batman once described The Joker in "The Joker's Five way Revenge" as "a one man plague. He comes, he kills and disappears" and I think that's the way they're going with him. We're going to see more of The Joker's handy-work than the man himself. It'll give us a chance to understand why people fear him, how his killings are near supernatural in efficency, and feel the protagonists frustration to catch a man that seemingly can't be caught. And will add a boost to The Joker making him that much more ominious and sinister.
If I'm right, it's going be something different and awesome.
zer00 said:I think I have come to terms with Joker being...well
But I always assumed this was going to happen. Atleast Bettany is gone
Just a shame J-man isn't going to getreally any props![]()
Babs Gordon said:what if someone told you that joker would have a principal villain role in 3? would that appease you?![]()