The Dark Knight Well....this is intresting? (Joker news)

[Mr. Socko]

THE JOKER is not, I REPEAT, IS NOT John Doe

What might work for 1 person, doesn't mean it'll work for everyone

 

[Brian2887]

THE JOKER is not, I REPEAT, IS NOT John Doe

What might work for 1 person, doesn't mean it'll work for everyone

And you'd rather he laugh and dance flamboyantly for two movies? What you don't see is scarier than what you do.

 

[Boom]

I know some of you will hate to hear this, but The Joker will be a MAJOR selling point for this movie.

You may not want him to be in the center of things, but I promise you that the general public does. What do you honestly think the reaction would be if The Joker was kept behind the scenes through most of the film?

Like I said, you may like it, both general folks most likely won't, and the movie isn't just being made for us. WB knows that. I mean good lord, look how much talk is flying around regarding the Joker casting, and we're still MONTHS away from an announcement. The Joker IS the talk of the sequel, and that is the plain truth.

 

[Boom]

And you'd rather he laugh and dance flamboyantly for two movies?

After brutally murdering someone? Sure. It's sick and twisted.

 

[Mr. Socko]

And you'd rather he laugh and dance flamboyantly for two movies? What you don't see is scarier than what you do.

I don't care if he laughs and dances FLAMBOYANTLY or whatever kind of way, the guy just needs to be in most of the movie.

After brutally murdering someone? Sure. It's sick and twisted.

Brilliant

 

[Brian2887]

But Nolan knows what he's doing. This is a trilogy, at least. If the next movie is Harvey Dent with Joker in the shadows, what do you think #3, the biggest movie, will be?

If I'm reading the report correctly, Joker will work in the shadows and pull strings for a movie before becoming an all-out force in the third flick.

Sounds great to me.

 

[The Fallen]

I don't care if he laughs and dances FLAMBOYANTLY or whatever kind of way, the guy just needs to be in most of the movie.



Brilliant

Joker Begins?

 

[Mr. Socko]

I know some of you will hate to hear this, but The Joker will be a MAJOR selling point for this movie.

YOU may not want him to be in the center of things, but I PROMISE you that the general public does. What do you honestly think the reaction would be if The Joker was kept behind the scenes through most of the film?

Like I said, you may like it, both general folks most likely won't, and the movie isn't just being made for us. WB knows that.

Someone who understands!

WB knows what is good for them. Lots of Joker.

 

[Mr. Socko]

Joker Begins?

NO! He's already the Joker

 

[Boom]

Speaking of the third movie, you know what would be sweet?

A gang war. Joker's vs TwoFace's. And Batman's caught right smack dab in the middle of it.

 

[Hunter Rider]

I know some of you will hate to hear this, but The Joker will be a MAJOR selling point for this movie.

You may not want him to be in the center of things, but I promise you that the general public does. What do you honestly think the reaction would be if The Joker was kept behind the scenes through most of the film?

Like I said, you may like it, both general folks most likely won't, and the movie isn't just being made for us. WB knows that. I mean good lord, look how much talk is flying around regarding the Joker casting, and we're still MONTHS away from an announcement. The Joker IS the talk of the sequel, and that is the plain truth.

Co-Sign

 

[Mr. Socko]

lol

What can't these people understand

Joker should be in MOST of the movie

Batman should be in just about ALL of the movie

 

[Brian2887]

Speaking of the third movie, you know what would be sweet?

A gang war. Joker's vs TwoFace's. And Batman's caught right smack dab in the middle of it.

I was honestly just thinking something like that. Make it a Knightfall kind of story, in that Batman is worn down completely by being in the middle. He won't get his back broken or anything, but I'd love to see his stretched beyond his limits.

 

[Hunter Rider]

Speaking of the third movie, you know what would be sweet?

A gang war. Joker's vs TwoFace's. And Batman's caught right smack dab in the middle of it.

Your on a roll my good man
It would lead to some cool scene of Batman playing them off against each other

 

[Erundur]

Jett just added this I guess -

"And when it is all said and done, it's going to be whomever Chris Nolan wants it to be. Oh, don't take "small and mysterious" as "cameo." Stay tuned! "

http://www.batman-on-film.com/batmovienews.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------

So that definitely means, dont expect the Joker to take up full screen time like B89... Expect it to be more on the lines of Ducard/Ra's in Begins(like all the villains playing along, with Bats as the main character)...Sounds good!

I was getting worried there
I still have faith in Nolan but no Bettany? Damn it!

Hey I'm a minority and I haven't had any problems with people accepting my opinion (except on Community.)

 

[The Fallen]

NO! He's already the Joker

I know that! I ment that when you say you want the Joker in most of the movie. Why not call the movie 'Joker Begins'?

BATMAN and Bruce Wanye are the main characters in the movie, they need to be developed the most.

The Joker is Batman greatest rival. But there are many different ways to establish is. Maybe Nolan will try to establish is 'relationship' maybe not. They tried to do it in BATMAN '89 with Joker/Jack Naiper killed the Wayne's and while it worked in the movie, the fanboys shat on it as it strayed from the original mythos.

Why go through the same ol thing of 'baddie threatens Gotham, Batman stops it? IT'S BORING!

The Sequel needs to be different, IMO. Have the joker be the wild card in the underworld vs. Batman, Dent and Gordon.

 

[zer00]

And you'd rather he laugh and dance flamboyantly for two movies? What you don't see is scarier than what you do.

It's kept Joker around for decades hasn't it?

 

[Mr. Socko]

I know that! I ment that when you say you want the Joker in most of the movie. Why not call the movie 'Joker Begins'?

BATMAN and Bruce Wanye are the main characters in the movie, they need to be developed the most.

The Joker is Batman greatest rival. But there are many different ways to establish is. Maybe Nolan will try to establish is 'relationship' maybe not. They tried to do it in BATMAN '89 with Joker/Jack Naiper killed the Wayne's and while it worked in the movie, the fanboys shat on it as it strayed from the original mythos.

Why go through the same ol thing of 'baddie threatens Gotham, Batman stops it? IT'S BORING!

The Sequel needs to be different, IMO. Have the joker be the wild card in the underworld vs. Batman, Dent and Gordon.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What can't these people understand

Joker should be in MOST of the movie

Batman should be in just about ALL of the movie

 

[Boom]

Co-Sign

Thanks.

Look, I agree with everybody here. Batman should be the main focus of this movie, as he was in Batman Begins. I don't want the Joker taking over the show. But I don't want him short-changed either. I want memorable scenes, scenes that will become classics. I don't want to spend a good portion of the movie thinking, "LOOK! ANOTHER DEAD BODY! WE'RE ONE STEP CLOSER TO SEEING A COOL JOKER SCENE!!"

Seriously.

 

[zer00]

Thanks.

Look, I agree with everybody here. Batman should be the main focus of this movie, as he was in Batman Begins. I don't want the Joker taking over the show. But I don't want him short-changed either. I want memorable scenes, scenes that will become classics. I don't want to spend the whole movie thinking, "LOOK! ANOTHER DEAD BODY! WE'RE ONE STEP CLOSER TO SEEING A COOL JOKER SCENE!!"

Seriously.

Yup. The SE7EN anaology is just dumb.

Everyone who will go see this movie knows who the Joker is and what he looks like and how he should act. John Doe on the other hand....

Doing that to the Joker would just piss off the audience and probobly bring about negativites about the film.

 

[Mr. Socko]

They tried to do it in BATMAN '89 with Joker/Jack Naiper killed the Wayne's and while it worked in the movie, the fanboys shat on it as it strayed from the original mythos.

Yeah, Ducard being Ra's Al Ghul was ripped right from the comics...

Those fanboys you speak of amaze me

 

[Mr. Socko]

Yup. The SE7EN anaology is just dumb.

Everyone who will go see this movie knows who the Joker is and what he looks like and how he should act. John Doe on the other hand....

Doing that to the Joker would just piss off the audience and probobly bring about negativites about the film.

EXACTLY

Especially from me...

 

[Ming]

You know what, I'd rather have a movie that had no Joker than one that had over 60% of him.

 

[The Joker]

This is bull crap.The Joker cannot have a small role in this movie.He's either a central villain,or just leave him out of it altogether.

And this feeling his presence despite his small role nonsense I've seen some people say is not applicable here.Anyone who reads the Batman comics knows the Joker doesn't do small roles like this.He cannot play second fiddle to any other villain in a Batman movie.

I sincerely hope this is not true.Otherwise my faith in Nolan has just plummeted.

 

[Mr. Socko]

You know what, I'd rather have a movie that had no Joker than one that had over 60% of him.

So you'd rather ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL over Batman '89....


Disturbing.....