DoomsdayApex
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 16,391
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
ЯɘvlveR;23084679 said:realism is a ******** ass term brought up by nolanites to justify his anti JL stance. what the **** is real about any of those bat films? that somehow an orphaned billionaire would become both a master martial artist and the worlds greatest detective before the age of thirty? or how the joker took over gotham in a week? c'mon son.
as far as I'm concerned, they don't know how to go about it. that's what they're afraid of. ****ing it up, and having bats retain some of that bombed stank from a possible JL film, and having that kill the franchise. the only other proven dc franchise was supes, and after the debacle of returns, they decided on ****ing zod again.
1.) No one in the Batboards uses the term 'realistic' (haven't seen it used in almost a year). You're right, there's nothing realistic about Nolan's Universe, but it's not fantastical either. The only people who use the term 'realistic' are newbies. Nolan's Batflicks are a dark and gritty modern take on the character and his universe.
So trust me, it's not 'realism' that's holding anything back.
2.) No one from the GA has seen Zod on the big screen (at least from this generation). So other than comic book fans, no one cares if it's Zod in a Superman film again.
Zod was the cheaper route for WB and Snyder/The Nolans/Goyer to take. Villains like Doomsday, Darkseid and Brainiac would cost a bundle more. MoS budget would have to been +200 million.