what do you look for in a girl or guy?

Herr Logan said:
She didn't tell you the reason? What a b1tchy thing to do.

How long were you together? How serious was it?

:wolverine

As I can remember almost 2 years.

It was very serious (I could do almost everything to make her happy).

But now I just can't understand what happened with her.

Damn, it really hurts :(
 
Herr Logan said:
That's the spirit!

:wolverine

People always discriminate, saying they're looking for anything with a pulse, but there's plenty of 'life-challenged' individuals who are ready for us!

This thread might be the right time to use a phrase a few of us came up with:

"Old enough to read, old enough to bleed"

(It's a joke, nothing more, before people get strange!)
 
Cinemaman said:
As I can remember almost 2 years.

It was very serious (I could do almost everything to make her happy).

But now I just can't understand what happened with her.

Damn, it really hurts :(

Well I know how you feel, 2 years worth, seemed to mean nothing to her:(. Still best freinds, but apparently, i became too great a freind, how does that work??? Women, HUH!
 
Cyrusbales said:
Well I know how you feel, 2 years worth, seemed to mean nothing to her:(. Still best freinds, but apparently, i became too great a freind, how does that work??? Women, HUH!

:csad: :(
 
Cinemaman said:

not to mention her then going out with one of her freinds(a freind of like 14 years or so), so yeah, I was too much of a freind? SCREW THAT! Anyways, they split after a very short time, so I feel good about that at least!

But anyways, no use dwelling on the past, instead, become an alcoholic? or just deeped yourself in your work like moi!
 
Hey Cinemaman I know it's all perspective and this is probably the most difficult thing you've experienced but you are 16. You have a whole lot more living and loving to be doing even before you get out of college. Just chalk this one up to experience. In a few years if that, this will seem like nothing.
 
Cyrusbales said:
not to mention her then going out with one of her freinds(a freind of like 14 years or so), so yeah, I was too much of a freind? SCREW THAT! Anyways, they split after a very short time, so I feel good about that at least!

But anyways, no use dwelling on the past, instead, become an alcoholic? or just deeped yourself in your work like moi!

To be honest, this is what i am trying to do now :up:
 
Erzengel said:
Hey Cinemaman I know it's all perspective and this is probably the most difficult thing you've experienced but you are 16. You have a whole lot more living and loving to be doing even before you get out of college. Just chalk this one up to experience. In a few years if that, this will seem like nothing.

Yeah, you are right. But now I feel myself very crappy.
 
Well you should work at improving the way you feel yourself till you meet someone new. :(
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
Well you should work at improving the way you feel yourself till you meet someone new. :(

Are we talking solo work here? mayonaise making? pounding on the flounder? It made me laugh anyways....
 
Herr Logan said:
"Presumably." Exactly. You have absolutely no idea how it's likely to be, and you seem to prefer it that way.

I don't get how someone can go into an arrangement such as marriage without knowing every significant thing they can reasonably learn in preparation. I'm not saying that sex and sexual performance should always be a deal-breaker, but the idea of sharing a bed with someone for the rest of your life and not having seen what that's like in all circumstances (i.e. when having sex and also when just sleeping, reading, etc.) is ludicrous and naive to me. Some people don't care much about sex, I know, and they can go into a marriage blind without being concerned with it, but when you haven't had it, you don't have an educated perspective in the least.

That doesn't mean you should go out and have sex for its own sake or with people you don't trust. The idea that you need an excuse like marriage to "officially" trust someone enough to have sex because you read a rule in a book and heard it in church is ignorant, superstitious and slavish behavior. Either you're grown up enough to handle it or you aren't. Nobody else can make that decision, and certainly not a holy man with a license to legally join people who's allegedly sworn off sex.

If that sounds condescending or disrespectful, I apologize, but I'm being completely honest about this topic.

:wolverine
You're right - I don't know a lot. I don't mean I'd "officially" trust someone only after we got married. I just mean I would only want to have sex with someone who's sworn to be with me for the rest of our lives. If my partner isn't willing to go that far, why would I want to waste sex on them? What if I got sick or pregnant, and he left? Where would I be then?

I know my parents - who've been together for 22 years and love each other to death. It seems to have worked for them. I'm not saying it's written in stone. I haven't dated very often or been in a relationship, so you could be right. My goal, though, is marriage - or if not marriage, then a very committed relationship.
 
mmm mmm mmm, if anythinh gets guys hot, it's a woman who wont' have sex until marraige. But no, yeah, um, yay principles?
 
Just sweet, funny, and intelligent. Not a raving intellectual, just someone who you can have an interesting conversation with.
 
Well a good starting point is if they like me, otherwise there is no need to pursue, so if they like me, then I think, "would I?" and so on and so forth. I have no such thing as a 'type', I'm open to any sort of girl, judge the individual I say!
 
AnimeJune said:
You're right - I don't know a lot. I don't mean I'd "officially" trust someone only after we got married. I just mean I would only want to have sex with someone who's sworn to be with me for the rest of our lives. If my partner isn't willing to go that far, why would I want to waste sex on them? What if I got sick or pregnant, and he left? Where would I be then?

Swearing to be with you for the rest of your life doesn't mean he will. If he's not in it for the long haul, he'll leave you one way or another. It will just be easier if you're not legally bound to each other. But hey, if you're looking to get his money if he changes his mind, then by all means, marry him. If he's willing to marry someone without getting all the facts, he probably should be taken down a peg or two, financially or otherwise.

I know my parents - who've been together for 22 years and love each other to death. It seems to have worked for them. I'm not saying it's written in stone. I haven't dated very often or been in a relationship, so you could be right. My goal, though, is marriage - or if not marriage, then a very committed relationship.

Limiting sex to a committed, monogamous relationship is, in my view, the best decision. That's intelligent. Limiting sex to marriage, however, isn't intelligent, wise or in any way a grownup-type decision. It's naive, archaic, slavish and ignorant.
I'd hope you, and everyone else who wishes to get married someday, will stick with the former (committed relationship, with the potential for marriage) and actually put thought into their life decisions. On the chance that sex happens to be a deal-breaker for a marriage, better you find out beforehand than get stuck in an annoying or painful legal procedure that could easily have been avoided.

:wolverine
 
It would have to be pretty damn awful to be a deal-breaker, don't you think? It's not all about sex, is it? Wouldn't he like me for me?
I also heard that couples that live together for a long time before getting married have a markedly higher rate of divorce than people who only start living together when they get married.

To me, marriage = committed, monogamous relationship. I don't see what the difference is. It's not slavish, or naive, or archaic. If someone wants to get into a committed, monogamous relationship - why wouldn't they propose? :huh:
 
AnimeJune said:
It would have to be pretty damn awful to be a deal-breaker, don't you think? It's not all about sex, is it?

I never said it was all about sex, and yes, it sounds very cold, the possibility that sex is a deal-breaker. For many people, sex is a very important part of a romantic relationship. Anyone with any free will and curiosity would want to know what sex with their partner can be like before signing themselves into a legal contract like marriage. That's human nature. You know, the thing religion tries to get you to suppress, rather than sublimate?

Wouldn't he like me for me?

I'd hope so, darlin'. Still, a lot of guys like to actually know what they're getting into. It's the bare minimum a person can do to actually get a grasp of a life-long love relationship.

I also heard that couples that live together for a long time before getting married have a markedly higher rate of divorce than people who only start living together when they get married.

That statistic is true, but misleading. There is indeed a correlation between cohabitation before marriage and divorce. People who choose to live together before marriage are, from what I've studied, also more predisposed to divorce for the sole reason that they aren't slaves to "traditional values" and have the will to change their situation to fit their needs. They use their legal options and try to do what is right for them, not what is commanded by religious texts and speakers. They both "live in sin" and don't always "hold marriage sacred." People who "hold marriage sacred" don't get divorced, but rather stay in marriages that may have gone completely sour. Great way to live.

Bottom line: there is absolutely no causal relationship between unmarried cohabitation and divorce. Correlation does not equal causality. Don't try using that correlation as an argument in the future; plenty of other people know about what I just told you.

To me, marriage = committed, monogamous relationship. I don't see what the difference is. It's not slavish, or naive, or archaic.

Whatever you say, darlin'. I'm sure you're happy just as you are, and that's what's important.

If you need the permission of a clergyperson or justice of the peace, a piece of paper and fancy party to have sex with someone you claim to love, that sounds pretty slavish, naive and archaic to me. I realize that the whole virgin-until-marriage thing seems rebellious and unique in today's modern society and makes people feel special and moral and all that great stuff, but it's willful ignorance and self-imposed inexperience. There's nothing at all admirable about a person who refuses to learn when it's their obligation as a human with free will and a future to consider. You either value truth over fiction, or you don't.

If someone wants to get into a committed, monogamous relationship - why wouldn't they propose? :huh:

You really, really should ask some questions about what marriage actually is before even thinking about looking forward to it. You see, there's a legal aspect to it. No, wait, that's bull$hit... marriage is nothing but a legal status. People can romanticize it and claim it has anything at all to do with God and all that good stuff, but in the real world, it's a legal arrangement that affords more financial and legal security for people who stay within the arrangement. Important benefits include power of attorney and custody rights. If two people love each other and are committed to each other, the only thing that only marriage can bring to the table is the financial and legal benefits. Unless a person is a complete slave to tradition, all the purely emotional benefits of marriage can occur entirely without marriage. You don't need permission to be in love and have sex. Unless you do, which means you're beyond any kind of help that I've heard of, which makes me sadder than I can describe.

Either you can make your own decisions, or you can't, and relying on archaic texts and public speakers to tell you how to live your life can be as empowering as hell, but it's an automatic disqualification for self-reliance. You should have sex when your mind (as in your intellect, which cannot be taught through religion, ever), your emotions and your hormones all agree that it's time. Marriage has absolutely nothing to do with that, unless you're too insecure to make that step without permission.


:wolverine
 
He dry humps. He just wants to taint a naive innocent child's life with freaky sex. :(
 
All I'm really looking for in a woman is that she is genuinely a decent person. That, and she's not ass-ugly. I make an effort to look (relatively) good, so should she.
 
GoldenAgeHero said:
im pretty sure all of us know wtf we're looking for when itcomes to getting a potential partner, what are they?

Nakedness. And za boobies.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,269
Messages
22,077,593
Members
45,877
Latest member
dude9876
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"