I wasn't talking about Harvey. I was talking about Batman.
I wasn't talking about Harvey. I was talking about Batman.

Haha sorry, I just got what you meant
I understand what you mean, but I was just putting an example there of why I thought the Joker was lying. He changes his plans (and mind) so swiftly, and like I said, I was just trying to make it logical on how he could have actually done that.
Hmm.. hopefully that made sense.
Yes, but think of it like this. Joker initially wanted to kill Batman. Then he became so enamored with Batman and how much fun he was to challenge that he changed his mind and actually begun to protect Batman's identity because he thought a world without him would be so boring.
Similar with Dent, Joker may initially just have seen Dent as an obstacle to be removed for the underworld. Then he saw the golden opportunity to destroy Gotham's hope by using Harvey to do it.
Yes, but think of it like this. Joker initially wanted to kill Batman. Then he became so enamored with Batman and how much fun he was to challenge that he changed his mind and actually begun to protect Batman's identity because he thought a world without him would be so boring.
Similar with Dent, Joker may initially just have seen Dent as an obstacle to be removed for the underworld. Then he saw the golden opportunity to destroy Gotham's hope by using Harvey to do it.
So, basically the Joker was telling the truth the whole time with his whole 'and it was so... boring, I've had a change of heart' speech, and with his first video threat. To be honest, I think you're right. And I didn't really consider the fact that the Joker actually wanted Harvey dead; I always assumed he was lying and had this whole plan to corrupt Gotham's White Knight from the beginning. Makes a hell of a lot more sense than how complicated I originally thought.
It makes much more sense. Otherwise why would he be shooting an RPG at the van containing Harvey? I saw a Cracked article criticizing the complexity of Joker's plan in The Dark Knight, and I think they got it wrong. I had the impression that the Joker had different plans for the most likely foreseeable outcomes, as well adjusting his plans as the situation changed.

So, basically the Joker was telling the truth the whole time with his whole 'and it was so... boring, I've had a change of heart' speech, and with his first video threat. To be honest, I think you're right.
He would've corrupted everyone onshore because they'd spend their lives assuming whomever had lived were murderers, when they weren't. Imagine if the passengers had blown up their own boat, then all the prisoners get the death penalty because people assume they did it. That would fit right with Joker's view of the world.I don't think anyone else would be aware of the detonators switching. Joker wanted to corrupt people, to bring them down to his level, so to speak. If the civilians blew themselves up trying to blow up the other boat, I think Joker would be satisfied that their last act before their death was that of attempted murder.
As to whether or not he did actually switch the detonators, as people have said in this thread, we'll never know. I wouldn't put it past him to have done so though.
My friend brought up a good point: After fibbing to Batmanabout the locations of Dent and Dawes, how do we know the passengers of the boat weren't given their own detonators and told it was for the other boat.
My friend brought up a good point: After fibbing to Batman about the locations of Dent and Dawes, how do we know the passengers of the boat weren't given their own detonators and told it was for the other boat.