Defenders only. which, surprisingly, is not an option in the poll.
and with Defenders I mean Defenders, not Heroes for Hire and their Lawyer
It sucks they're using the name Defenders for something that has nothing to do with it.
like police, fire fighters and others? heck, I'm pretty sure the Ghostbusters themselves were no non-profit organisation"heroes who charge for their services aren't real heroes"
They should've named the Netflix crossover Heroes for Hire. That fits better than Defenders, there's actually a connection there.
Except for Daredevil. Or the "for hire" aspect. Luke Cage and Danny Rand are Heroes for Hire. I don't even think Jessica Jones is, but I'm sure she'll fit just fine there. But Matt Murdock doesn't.
It sucks they're using the name Defenders for something that has nothing to do with it.
You're reaching, man. Heroes having careers does not make them heroes for hire. Unless they are hired for superheroic services Iike Iron Fist and Luke Cage, they aren't the same.Presumably Jessica Jones is though, if she's a private detective. Does she get paid in fish?
And Daredevil is a lawyer, who is hired, and is a hero. He may not be a hero for hire in that he's a hero that is hired for his heroic services, but he is a hero who is hired for his legal services. A hero for legal hire.
So Heroes For Hire would've been an all-encompassing title which would've been the most appropriate. They can still change it since they've changed Jessica Jones back to AKA Jessica Jones.
That would leave Dr Strange to actually form the Defenders with Hulk and others.
You're reaching, man. Heroes having careers does not make them heroes for hire. Unless they are hired for superheroic services Iike Iron Fist and Luke Cage, they aren't the same.
He may not be a hero for hire in that he's a hero that is hired for his heroic services
like police, fire fighters and others? heck, I'm pretty sure the Ghostbusters themselves were no non-profit organisation