Where I live, you need an education just to clean toilets. Many people drop out of the schools, and is on welfare.
Do you think that North Americans are unhappy because of religion, or something else?
Personally, I have always viewed you americans as tolerant people.
The people of North Korea aren't actually atheist (they worship their leaders as literal deities), and it's a myth that Soviet regimes were staunchly atheistic as well. Where are you getting this information?
That one's getting old. Communism is by nature atheistic. And I'm sure you americans would worship something other than God if you got rid of him. Just look at the way western culture worships celebrities. We need something to believe in... It is in our nature. One of the things all almost all cultures have in common is a form of belief system. What would you replace it with?
And I'm sure you americans would worship something other than God if you got rid of him. Just look at the way western culture worships celebrities. We need something to believe in... It is in our nature. One of the things all almost all cultures have in common is a form of belief system. What would you replace it with?
Respectfully, it is really quite unnecessary to study all of the creeds and doctrines in any particular religion or superstition to realise that you don't accept it. It is enough to disagree with the basic premise.
You might write a 2,000 page treatise on why Kermit the frog is the Messiah, and I would be at liberty to weigh up the thesis based on universal principles of empirical logic, without having to wade through the whole text.
That's not even remotely true. What is your reasoning here?Communism is by nature atheistic.
This is such a non-sequitur my head might literally explode.Goddamn Batman said:And I'm sure you americans would worship something other than God if you got rid of him. Just look at the way western culture worships celebrities. We need something to believe in... It is in our nature. One of the things all almost all cultures have in common is a form of belief system. What would you replace it with?
I'm Canadian.
And again, where are the stats for your claim?
Americans aren't very tolerant. Ask the blacks and Muslims down there how they feel. Canadians are also very intolerant of Native Americans. Everyone has their prejudices, some are just better at hiding them.
I'd say money is the biggest reason people in North America are unhappy.
How about trying to discover the answer to questions that people answer with God (ex. why are we here? Who made us? etc...) by gathering evidence rather than relying on texts written 2,000 years ago and translated multiple times?
Just take my word for it. You would understand if you lived here.
That could be true, but you can't blame religion for it. In my country, some people use darwinism as an argument for white superiority. Africans are stupid because of their genes, gypsies are bred to be thieves etc.
There was even a tv show about evolutionary psychology where it was claimed that blacks are unable to get good jobs because they are a little dumber than whites. Of course, it was very controversial... But I don't believe americans would air a show like that, would you?
But scandinavians are among the richest people in the world, yet they the are the happiest?
If you read my first post here, you would know that it wasn't the bible that made me believe in a god. The bible came later.
If you have "faith" it does indeed mean that your mind is not entirely open, because having a "faith" is making a statement that your mind won't be changed. That is closed-mindedness by definition.
Your point about original thought is a separate one. I suppose you are talking about creative thought? If so, I don't agree, with the caveat that atheists (who I presume are the people you refer to as "believing in nothing") should be less gullible and more questioning of the fanciful.

Just take my word for it. You would understand if you lived here.
That could be true, but you can't blame religion for it. In my country, some people use darwinism as an argument for white superiority. Africans are stupid because of their genes, gypsies are bred to be thieves etc.
There was even a tv show about evolutionary psychology where it was claimed that blacks are unable to get good jobs because they are a little dumber than whites. Of course, it was very controversial... But I don't believe americans would air a show like that, would you?
But either way, evidence is better than just taking things on blind faith.
I love that term, "Darwinism." You can usually tell a lot about a person's attitude towards evolutionary biology by their use of that term.Just take my word for it. You would understand if you lived here.
That could be true, but you can't blame religion for it. In my country, some people use darwinism as an argument for white superiority. Africans are stupid because of their genes, gypsies are bred to be thieves etc.
There was even a tv show about evolutionary psychology where it was claimed that blacks are unable to get good jobs because they are a little dumber than whites. Of course, it was very controversial... But I don't believe americans would air a show like that, would you?
But scandinavians are among the richest people in the world, yet they the are the happiest?
Are you agnostic with regard to the existence of the Greek and Roman gods?So you're agnostic, then? There could be a god, or maybe there isn't a god. It can't be proven either way?
That's not even remotely true. What is your reasoning here?
Ah, the old "atheists can never do anything bad"-argument. If they do anything wrong, it's not because of their pilosophy, it's because they are really religious. Am I right?
So you're agnostic, then? There could be a god, or maybe there isn't a god. It can't be proven either way?
Are we about to have a pedantry war over the words "faith", "original" and "nothing"?
Really?
This was interesting a while ago...but it is no longer. Thank you though!![]()
I don't believe there is a god, but there is always that slim possibility. I consider it as likely as finding out unicorns are real but it's not 100% impossible, I suppose. It can't be disproven but the gap for one closes with most scientific advancements about the world and the universe.
hehehe....It isn't really pedantry when the definitions of the disputed terms are integral to the debate.

Any explanation that has physical evidence supporting it is materialistic. You might as well say that you are not convinced by any scientific discovery because it is materialistic (this includes the germ theory, atomic theory, gravitation etc...). In addition, the items you listed do not lie beyond our understanding. There are well documented explanations for the mind, our perception of the self, and morality.Love, mind, self and soul, right, wrong. Justice. I've heard all of the materialistic explanations... Not convinced.
There are well documented explanations for the mind, our perception of the self, and morality.