World Which film had the best swinging scenes??

[ThatSpiderGuy]

Lets see a real example of terrible physics:

Look where the crane is and how he doesn't even seem to shot his webs to it and most importantly look how he goes up in a straight vertical line which makes no sense, it looks like he's flying. His body movement makes no sense as he doesn't seem to gain momentum, its embarrasing for something made in 2012

He is gaining momentum with the elasticity of the web, also he is hurling is weight forward and up. You see his legs?? They are pointed upwards. Also, he has the super strength of Spider-Man, so he is able to hurl himself upwards by using the force and inertia of the web line as his momentum is gaining. I have done this myself, but on a much lesser degree of course. I was using a rope swing into a river, and the drop was huge. I didn't swing far, since the object the rope was connected to was closer to me, but I was really high up. So instead of shooting out far, I just swung up really high when gravity took its toll. I forced myself upwards to try and do some crazy flip into the water so I would look cool in front of the girls. But obviously I didn't go as high as Spider-Man, since the rope was not elastic and I don't have super strength. Instead I went a couple of feet higher and splashed uncomfortably in the water.
Point is, those physics are pretty accurate, because of the angle where spider-man shoots his web from and pulls himself up using the elasticity of the web and his super strength. He gains momentum with gravity and uses that momentum to hurl himself high in the air so he can get a direct shot at the farther crane so the next swing will deliver him farther due to the angle of where he shoots the web.

 

[Keehar]

Lets see a real example of terrible physics:

Look where the crane is and how he doesn't even seem to shot his webs to it and most importantly look how he goes up in a straight vertical line which makes no sense, it looks like he's flying. His body movement makes no sense as he doesn't seem to gain momentum, its embarrasing for something made in 2012

You win the prize.

Don't worry though I am sure a deep high art MS sketch is on it's way explaining this completely.

 

[Johnny-Oh]

Lets see another example:

This scenes looks very sloppy, look how he gets slower 'cause he doesn't use his weight to gain momentum and then at the end he magically goes up. It looks like a baby Tarzan tbh

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

The main factor is the elasticity of the web, the angle,from where he shot the web, and how he uses the web to pull himself to great heights.
I'm good with physics, I have to draw this stuff. But you still probably won't believe me either way.

 

[Andrew Lucas]

Lets see a real example of terrible physics:

Look where the crane is and how he doesn't even seem to shot his webs to it and most importantly look how he goes up in a straight vertical line which makes no sense, it looks like he's flying. His body movement makes no sense as he doesn't seem to gain momentum, its embarrasing for something made in 2012

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum

 

[spiderman2]

This one is not even trying to make a serious argument any more. Just tom foolery answers, and dodging my questions. You sit there and giggle, play with your MS paint, drunk your tea, and read your Mark Kermode reviews.

I'll move on to the last fighting survivor soon to fold.



It does when it looks more authentic and better than the new stuff. Did you even read the two links I posted? I bet not.

I do think the Raimi trilogy were better for their time, and better than a lot of stuff that's coming out these days, your precious Amazing Spider-Man movies top of the list among them.

You're a fan of these movies. You say you don't get why they're hated. You and the others belly ache when they got beaten on this poll. The MS painter said we had jumped the shark and went into the Tobey Zone.

You people live in your own world about these movies. No room for some reality in your minds. Well get ready, reality just bit you on the butts. Just accept it.

Only the old movies don't look authentic at all. I looked at that link about old movies and such and most of the photos in there looked heck of fake. That is why I have a hard time watching any like per 90's movies because most per 90's movies look heck heck of face even a lot of 90's movies look heck heck of fake. The problem is some of the completes agest this movies you can say about ever another sm movie yet all of a sudden it wasn't a problem in till asm1 and 2 such has being to cheesy even though sm1-3 was chessy times like 10 compared to asm1 and 2. About the tobey AG poll after but before asm2 AG had like a 70% to like 30% lead on tobey but now after asm2 all of a sudden tobey has like a 58 to 42 lead. So why did tobey go up 28% and AG go down 28%? Because asm2 didn't turn out the way people wanted and so it has clouded peoples judgment about different parts of the movie and don't even get me started about the BS that is AG peter being a jerk.

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

I honestly can't believe that it's come to the point where I have to explain to people basic physics like this. Has it really come to the point where we are saying the physics of the old spider-man movies is better than the new ones?? LMAO

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum

LMAOOOO you did a much simpler version of my post. Lol

 

[Keehar]

I honestly can't believe that it's come to the point where I have to explain to people basic physics like this. Has it really come to the point where we are saying the physics of the old spider-man movies is better than the new ones?? LMAO

No you don't have to explain anything. Your explanations are applicable to all Spider-Man swinging, including Raimi's. It's not the physics that was better, they're the same, it's the visual, the FX, everything. All better in Raimi's.

That's what's being said. You laugh your ass off all you like about it. It'll still be said tomorrow. And the day after that. And after that. The poll will probably climb more in Raimi's favour, too. There'll be more bellyaching about it.

 

[Johnny-Oh]

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum

I know you have a hard time defending your points but posting links of things you clearly don't understand is not gonna help.

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

No you don't have to explain anything. Your explanations are applicable to all Spider-Man swinging, including Raimi's. It's not the physics that was better, they're the same, it's the visual, the FX, everything. All better in Raimi's.

That's what's being said. You laugh your ass off all you like about it. It'll still be said tomorrow. And the day after that. And after that. The poll will probably climb more in Raimi's favour, too. There'll be more bellyaching about it.

Why thank you, I will keep laughing about it, I find it very funny XD

 

[Keehar]

Only the old movies don't look authentic at all. I looked at that link about old movies and such and most of the photos in there looked heck of fake. That is why I have a hard time watching any like per 90's movies because most per 90's movies look heck heck of face even a lot of 90's movies look heck heck of fake. The problem is some of the completes agest this movies you can say about ever another sm movie yet all of a sudden it wasn't a problem in till asm1 and 2 such has being to cheesy even though sm1-3 was chessy times like 10 compared to asm1 and 2. About the tobey AG poll after but before asm2 AG had like a 70% to like 30% lead on tobey but now after asm2 all of a sudden tobey has like a 58 to 42 lead. So why did tobey go up 28% and AG go down 28%? Because asm2 didn't turn out the way people wanted and so it has clouded peoples judgment about different parts of the movie and don't even get me started about the BS that is AG peter being a jerk.

Now you can't watch movies from the 90's because you don't like their FX. Good for you. Deny yourself some brilliant movies with great FX. I don't know what a 'chessy' movie is supposed to mean. Before Amazing Spider-Man 2, that poll, I assume you mean the poll in that other thread here was only made a week or two ago wasn't it. So how did it come before Amazing Spider-Man 2?

Are you even talking the same topic as the rest of us here?

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

TASM2 gets a 53% on Rotten Tomatoes, all of sudden EVERY SINGLE TINY MINISCULE AND SPECIFIC DETAIL about the film is utter crap. :/

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

Hey BRAB I really love those MS paint drawings you did, keep it up ^_^

 

[Johnny-Oh]

He is gaining momentum with the elasticity of the web, also he is hurling is weight forward and up. You see his legs?? They are pointed upwards. Also, he has the super strength of Spider-Man, so he is able to hurl himself upwards by using the force and inertia of the web line as his momentum is gaining. I have done this myself, but on a much lesser degree of course. I was using a rope swing into a river, and the drop was huge. I didn't swing far, since the object the rope was connected to was closer to me, but I was really high up. So instead of shooting out far, I just swung up really high when gravity took its toll. I forced myself upwards to try and do some crazy flip into the water so I would look cool in front of the girls. But obviously I didn't go as high as Spider-Man, since the rope was not elastic and I don't have super strength. Instead I went a couple of feet higher and splashed uncomfortably in the water.
Point is, those physics are pretty accurate, because of the angle where spider-man shoots his web from and pulls himself up using the elasticity of the web and his super strength. He gains momentum with gravity and uses that momentum to hurl himself high in the air so he can get a direct shot at the farther crane so the next swing will deliver him farther due to the angle of where he shoots the web.

He wouldn't need to do that since at the beggining of that shot you can see that his web magically shoots to the crane even tho from that angle it was not possible

He would simply need to use his weight forward since the cranes are in straight line, he doesn't need to do all that crap that its ultimately pointless.

 

[spiderman2]

Now you can't watch movies from the 90's because you don't like their FX. Good for you. Deny yourself some brilliant movies with great FX. I don't know what a 'chessy' movie is supposed to mean. Before Amazing Spider-Man 2, that poll, I assume you mean the poll in that other thread here was only made a week or two ago wasn't it. So how did it come before Amazing Spider-Man 2?

Are you even talking the same topic as the rest of us here?

Most 80's movies look heck heck of fake compared to any thing that you see now. There was a old poll that asked the same thing has the new poll about Toby and AG that was way in favorite of AG that came out before asm2 came out and yet with the new poll it like has completely flip flopped. Why do you think that is? Even the crites in like the worst reviews for the movie just about all prasied AG has sm. So how do things change so much when its not like AG phoned it in like tobey did for sm3? Simple people are letting the results of the movie has a whole clody there judgment about things that where good about the movie.

 

[spiderman2]

TASM2 gets a 53% on Rotten Tomatoes, all of sudden EVERY SINGLE TINY MINISCULE AND SPECIFIC DETAIL about the film is utter crap. :/

lol so so true! Even the old poll with AG and toby is proff of that.

 

[Andrew Lucas]

Most 80's movies look heck heck of fake compared to any thing that you see now. There was a old poll that asked the same thing has the new poll about Toby and AG that was way in favorite of AG that came out before asm2 came out and yet with the new poll it like has completely flip flopped. Why do you think that is? Even the crites in like the worst reviews for the movie just about all prasied AG has sm. So how do things change so much when its not like AG phoned it in like tobey did for sm3? Simple people are letting the results of the movie has a whole clody there judgment about things that where good about the movie.

BTW, loved your new avatar.

 

[Airnick]

How bout we keep everything civil in here?

Anyway TASM2 had the best swings scenes IMO.

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

He wouldn't need to do that since at the beggining of that shot you can see that his web magically shoots to the crane even tho from that angle it was not possible

He would simply need to use his weight forward since the cranes are in straight line, he doesn't need to do all that crap that its ultimately pointless.

I've studied that gif thoroughly, and yes he can shoot it and yes he does. There's no magic involved. Spider-Man basically does a bit of a front flip and shoots the web in between his legs towards the crane as he looks up while he plummets to the ground.
And yes he does need to "do all that crap" since it will allow him to swing farther down the street since gravity would be working with him. If he remains straight and doesn't get any ark, then he will not be able to swing such distances.and in case you didn't remember, but that shot at the end of that gif is the last time spider-man shoots his web at a crane in that scene. So, from there there's still quite some distance on his way to Oscorp, so he needs a lot of ark for him to be able to make that giant swing over to the building. Spider-Man after that swing just happen to encounter a crate carried on a lift, so he uses that to his advantage.
AND all this gives us a stunning shot

 

[spiderman2]

BTW, loved your new avatar.

Thinks and it nice to have a big avatar now lol. Ever thing it better when it is bigger.

 

[Airnick]

Thinks and it nice to have a big avatar now lol. Ever thing it better when it is bigger.

Congrats man! I remember you joining this place lol.

That avvy of yours is also a great scene!

 

[Keehar]

Most 80's movies look heck heck of fake compared to any thing that you see now. There was a old poll that asked the same thing has the new poll about Toby and AG that was way in favorite of AG that came out before asm2 came out and yet with the new poll it like has completely flip flopped. Why do you think that is? Even the crites in like the worst reviews for the movie just about all prasied AG has sm. So how do things change so much when its not like AG phoned it in like tobey did for sm3? Simple people are letting the results of the movie has a whole clody there judgment about things that where good about the movie.

You said 90's not 80's. No contradictions please. An old poll, and when was this poll made and where.

You're asking me why did an actor who starred in two movies, both which were less critically and financially successful, come in second to an actor who was more successful in the role?

Stop and think again about that.

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

How bout we keep everything civil in here?

Anyway TASM2 had the best swings scenes IMO.

I agree to keep it civil, but I seem to be confronted with uncivil posts that make it appear that users are taking shots at me directly instead of the points I have been making. But, I will say those users aren't the only ones behaving in such a way. I'm just stating opinions, observations, and facts of physics. Tis all

 

[ThatSpiderGuy]

I like your avy as well spiderman2. It was one of the sequences that I really enjoyed from Raimi's films.