So you get to decide when JJ is telling the truth and lying? Why?
Rey being left on Jakku does not need to coincide with the massacre.
Maz not knowing Rey means what exactly? As to whether Ben recognizes her in anyway. There is of course, "What girl?"
Nope, it is probably when Ben killed her mother. Which is why she gets that vision and a second with Kylo.
Rey was 4 and has no barring on the attack or her parents. You assumed Luke didn't hide her before the attack. Why? The reason Leia sent Ben to Luke was because he was being tempted by the Dark Side. Why wouldn't Luke hide his child in that case?
And none of this says Rey isn't a Skywalker.
You literally have no facts, and in fact avoid facts to try and further your arugment. Like you did with Laurel, like you did with the Fantastic Four.
But if you so sure answer these questions:
1. Explain how the original spoilers that told us that the planet was a weapon, that the main hero was a female Solo and that the villain was a male Solo, got all those right, but Rey?
2. Why did the very legit shot order show the potential filming of a young Rey at the temple learning? If she has never met any of these people, how does that work out?
3. If Rey isn't a Skywalker, why make a big deal of who her parents are and not tell us who they are?
4. When give a lot of evidence about a certain situation, you wouldn't buy it. Also, if you believe in taking evidence at face value, why do you deny JJ's own words?
I was going to go to through the Fantastic Four stuff, but I don't hate myself that much. You simply ignore evidence that doesn't fit your narrative.
it depends. If they want to be as predictable as TFA was, they'll make her Luke's since most already guess this anyways. If they actually want to go with a lesser beleived theory, tying her to Obi-Wan would do the trick. Im hoping for the latter but I'll be satisified if its a true shock and someone i never considered. Luke though? Thats the one I want the least
They didn't give her the Skywalker lightsaber for her to be a random Kenobi. She was having visions of Skywalkers, not Obi-Wan. Her master is a Skywalker, her rival is a Skywalker. Her weapon is that of the Skywalkers. Her safe place is the location of Luke, even though she has never been there. Come on people.
By the way, I fully believe Luke knows who Rey is. His expression at the end said a lot of things, but there was clear acknowledgement. Of what, we will see.
Because of what Kylo did to Luke and his Jedi. Luke, the greatest of all Star Wars heroes, went into hiding. Something big happened. Something that rocked him. We don't know why yet. But what happens if he lost his love and his daughter, along with all his students? Luke might be worried about what it means to be a Skywalker, which is why he went looking for the first Jedi Temple. To see if his line is "cursed" somehow, that they somehow belong to the Dark Side.I don't disagree with what you're saying.
The part that rubs me wrong is why present Luke's kid as a mystery? We enter the original story with just Luke's perspective and Vader and Obi-Wan have a history.
The visions and the lightsaber don't actually have any meaning. Kylo is a Skywalker, too but the lightsaber doesn't belong to him any more than Rey(if she were a Kenobi) just on bloodline. It could be calling to her cause a Jedi took care of it before Luke came of age and needed another Jedi person to get it back to Luke.
What the visions mean could still be anything.
Copycat. I have been saying that since I saw the movie.I still maintain that in her vision, Rey saw her mom get cut down by Kylo. Now, whether that was Luke's wife is another question.
Because of what Kylo did to Luke and his Jedi. Luke, the greatest of all Star Wars heroes, went into hiding. Something big happened. Something that rocked him. We don't know why yet. But what happens if he lost his love and his daughter, along with all his students? Luke might be worried about what it means to be a Skywalker, which is why he went looking for the first Jedi Temple. To see if his line is "cursed" somehow, that they somehow belong to the Dark Side./QUOTE]
That makes it seem more like Luke's story and Rey as just apart of it/catalyst to just fill-in for Luke's story moving forward.
I hope they don't stop the momentum for filling in story beats for unseen episodes by making her his daughter.
The actual idea Magnar is the reason why Kylo is approaching Rey in the vision is because she is standing in the place where her mother would be.1) That wasn't a woman stabbed by Kylo in the vision.
2) That massacre happened a long time after Rey was already on Jakku.
One thing I find interesting is that everyone seems to just miss that Rey was on a planet with an old Skywalker/Solo friend, who is a Force fanboy. I have to feel this is going to come up again.
The circumstances under which Rey was left on Jakku have nothing to do with the Skywalker family.
Bloodline, which is set 6 years before TFA, has Leia and Han's marriage still intact and reveals that they're in fairly regular contact with Ben even though they're not aware of exactly where he and Luke - who is training him - are.
This means that Ben has not yet turned, which confirms that his turn had nothing whatsoever to do with Rey being left on Jakku.
It's long past time for the "Rey is a Skywalker" people to accept the truth and move on.
Melisandre has completely lost all of her confidence and faith, and isn't getting it back anytime soon... especially not before Thorne's deadline of "nightfall" comes and goes.
People just need to accept that she's not going to be doing what they want her to do [BLACKOUT](resurrect Jon)[/BLACKOUT] and move on.
Ben's attack on his fellow students does NOT happen during Bloodline.
There's zero mention of Snoke or the First Order in Bloodline, and zero indication of anything being 'off' other than Leia being worried about having lost contact with him and Luke.
Because of what Kylo did to Luke and his Jedi. Luke, the greatest of all Star Wars heroes, went into hiding. Something big happened. Something that rocked him. We don't know why yet. But what happens if he lost his love and his daughter, along with all his students? Luke might be worried about what it means to be a Skywalker, which is why he went looking for the first Jedi Temple. To see if his line is "cursed" somehow, that they somehow belong to the Dark Side.
One thing I find interesting is that everyone seems to just miss that Rey was on a planet with an old Skywalker/Solo friend, who is a Force fanboy. I have to feel this is going to come up again.
Or perhaps Luke is Rey's father or he knows who Rey's parents are and where to find them
J. J. Abrams: I loved how Star Wars had that sense of a world far beyond the borders of what you can see and have been told its one of the things it did so brilliantly. If you watch the first movie, you dont actually know exactly what the Empire is trying to do. Theyre going to rule by fear but you dont know what their end game is. You dont know what Leia is princess of. You dont yet understand who Jabba the Hutt is, even though there is a reference to him. You dont know that Vader is Lukes father, Leia is his sister but the possibility is all there. The beauty of that movie was that it was an unfamiliar world, & yet you wanted to see it expand and to see where it went. (November 2, 2013)
Q: "Youve talked about trying to recapture the spirit and feel of the original Star Wars trilogy. One thing I personally loved about those films, especially the first, was that there was all this backstory that was alluded to but never explainedthe audience was plunged into this fully imagined world, and it was a little bit of a sink-or-swim thing. Like in the first film, someone makes a passing reference to the Clone Wars, which was originally a laugh linethe idea that these characters talked about their shared history the way we might talk about World War II and no one was going to give you a paragraph of exposition was funny. For me, it took some of the fun out of Star Wars when all that backstory was filled in in the prequels."
J. J. Abrams: What was incredible about Star Wars, among other things, was that in that first movie Vader couldve been his father, but he wasnt, you know. Leia couldve been his sister, but she wasnt. You didnt really know what the Empire was up to exactly. You didnt really understand what it meant that there was a Senate or the Dark Times or any of the references, and yet you felt the presence of all these things and you understood because it was all being referenced in a way that allowed you to fill in the blanks, and thats a very powerful thing. (May 6, 2015)
Q: "How much of The Force Awakens is geared toward welcoming people back to the Star Wars franchise versus starting something completely new? How do you strike a balance between those two imperatives?"
J. J. Abrams: We wanted to tell a story that had its own self-contained beginning, middle, and end but at the same time, like A New Hope, implied a history that preceded it and also hinted at a future to follow. When Star Wars first came out, it was a film that both allowed the audience to understand a new story but also to infer all sorts of exciting things that might be. In that first movie, Luke wasnt necessarily the son of Vader, he wasnt necessarily the brother of Leia, but it was all possible. The Force Awakens has this incredible advantage, not just of a passionate fan base but also of a backstory that is familiar to a lot of people. Weve been able to use what came before in a very organic way, because we didnt have to reboot anything. We didnt have to come up with a backstory that would make sense; its all there. (November 2015)
Q: "When you look back at the original trilogy, are there certain scenes that stand out to you?"
J. J. Abrams: "As a fan of Star Wars, I can look at those movies and both respect and love what theyve done. But working on The Force Awakens, weve had to consider them in a slightly different context. For example, its very easy to love 'I am your father.' But when you think about how and when and where that came, Im not sure that even Star Wars itself could have supported that story point had it existed in the first film, Episode IV. Meaning: It was a massively powerful, instantly classic moment in movie history, but it was only possible because it stood on the shoulders of the film that came before it. There had been a couple of years to allow the idea of Darth Vader to sink in, to let him emerge as one of the greatest movie villains ever. Time built up everyones expectations about the impending conflict between Luke and Vader. If 'I am your father' had been in the first film, I dont know if it would have had the resonance. I actually dont know if it would have worked." (November 2015)
Q: "I'm gonna go through some of the most jaw-dropping moments in Star Wars history and I would ask you to rate them of a scale of one to ten just how jaw-dropping was this moment. Number one being, 'oh, wow, that's interesting,' and number ten being, 'my jaw is still on the floor' 30 years later."
J. J. Abrams: The most jaw-dropping-est thing for me, though, in retrospect, is that moment in Episode IV where Leia is being held and Vader goes in to basically torture her to get the information. [...] When you think of it later and you go, Oh my God, thats his daughter. Hes going in to torture his own [daughter]. At the time, its just scary. Then it gets just really creepy when you think about it. Oh my god, thats the worst. You know, its horrible.
Q: "I know. When you watch them now - knowing all that - some of that stuff is just so bizarre, more jaw-dropping, yeah."
J. J. Abrams: It is. But thats whats so amazing about Star Wars, too. The possibilities were so enormous. At the end of Star Wars, you didnt know who was related to whom, but anything was possible. Thats what was so cool about it. (December 9, 2015)
Q: "But I assume there must have been some conversation about that in the writing process too, how much to reveal and how. Because the audience does need some things to attach to. So can you talk about figuring out how much to say about [Rey] and how much to hold back?"
J. J. Abrams: The thing about Star Wars is everyone who has seen these movies thinks, you know, I am your father. Its one of the first things you think about. And, There is another. And moments like that. But when you think about those big moments and then you stop and go, oh, neither of those things were in Star Wars. You know, Star Wars didnt say that Luke was the son of Vader. Star Wars didnt say that Leia was the sister of Luke. You didnt really understand what these references were. The Empire, dark times, Clone Wars. There are these things that are discussed that dont get explained. It was Episode IV. You know, George, among the unbelievable list of brilliant things he did, dropped you into a story and respected you and said, You will infer everything necessary to understand exactly what you need to know. And thats what we tried to do with this. We knew we were going to have a moment when Snoke was going to say to Ren, Your dads in the picture. Can this movie actually also hold, you know, And Rey is this and Finn is that and this is where Poe ? It was one of those things, and again it speaks to your restraint Look, this is the first, this is an opportunity of a lifetime to write a movie that is the first of a series, and there is a story to be told. And it will be. But this movie, it felt like the droid is in the hands of your father, Han Solo was probably the one real revelatory familial piece we could get away with. (December 22, 2015)