Who is to blame if this film doesn't do well?

^Yep but the movie still failed. Go figure.

Failed at what?
Appealing to someone that has a signature of "F**k it" and tried to list their location as "Obama-ville" but, instead typed, "Obama-vile"? He is quite vile, isn't he? ;)
 
I think the movie was fantastic, better than iron man ( which was a great movie but i personally prefer the hulk) and infinite superior than Ang Lees Hulk which i didn't enjoy. Why this hulk didn't made the money it deserved in my opinion is because of the 2003 movie, the absolute lack of marketing and the whole norton vs marvel thing. I dont think the quality of the CGI (which i thought was amazing in some parts and not so good in other) affected the movie, maybe because the star is CGI but that didn't stop transformers from making a lot more cash, even thou it was much worst than TIH. I really hope the dvd is huge and we get a second chance to see the hulk on the big screen, because i really enjoyed TIH, its my favorite marvel movie with x men 2 and iron man.
 
Ha ha! True! I guess I'll call my connections in Korea...!


You know, with enough ketchup, anything tastes ok.


(Can I try using the loophole that it didn't do Spider-Man numbers...it surpassed them...?)

lol go ahead, i can't believe how much money it's made, i didn't think it would do near spider-man numbers either
 
Failed at what?
Appealing to someone that has a signature of "F**k it" and tried to list their location as "Obama-ville" but, instead typed, "Obama-vile"? He is quite vile, isn't he? ;)
It failed at the boxoffice.
 
This movie was what I wanted ever Marvel Movie to be.
 
It failed at the boxoffice.

How so?
Explain your claim.

Notice that the ad doesn't say, "Box Office Failure".
If it was a failure, why would they specifically point out the box office on an advertisement? I don't recall Gigli, Waterworld, or Ishtar listing their box office take on ads for the home video.

picture.php
 
I don't cause I think it would be unfitting to blame Ang since I never saw the movie when it first came out. At that time I didn't have any interest in seeing it, not that it was the Hulk and its not like I never heard of him or don't know about him, which I do since I was a kid.

I can't really blame the guy. I really liked TIH though, and I thought it was one of the best comic adaptations to date and I put it up there with X2, Ironman, Daredevil (DC)... I had my doubts about Norton as Banner but I was blown away by him and especially Liv. So I don't feel bad that I didn't see Ang's version and am glad I saw TIH..I mean, what kind of idiot would miss out on their first hulk experience?
 
^As some might suggest, though, if TiH was the only Hulk movie, we might have seen a sequel instead of a reboot. Regardless of what one's opinion is about Ang's movie (I liked the take on the character), Hulk '03 did bring about harsh criticism and negativity toward the Hulk being on the big screen.
 
i DO blame Ang.

well, you can blame Ang's for TIH's low opening, not its weak legs, thats down to TIH. People who saw TIH didnt come back on the second week.
 
While I liked The Incredible Hulk, I still feel like they rushed it into production. It could've been a lot better. But, still, I liked it and I'm gonna pick it up on DVD.
 
How so?
Explain your claim.

Notice that the ad doesn't say, "Box Office Failure".
If it was a failure, why would they specifically point out the box office on an advertisement? I don't recall Gigli, Waterworld, or Ishtar listing their box office take on ads for the home video.

picture.php

Putting 'made 'X' amount of money at the box-office' on the DVD advertisements seems to be the in thing at the moment.

They did the same thing with the Hellboy 2 ad... (something like '75 million dollars box-office smash')... and we all know that movie can not be considered a runaway hit.


Considering how popular superhero movies appeared to be this summer... I think The Incredible Hulk was the most disappointing in terms of it's overall gross.
 
I think we are a bit too severe with our judgement of the box office. The Hulk did well given what it was going against. Comparing it to the Dark Knight makes little sense.

It will depend on how we spin this as to whether we will see the Hulk again or not.
 
How so?
Explain your claim.

Notice that the ad doesn't say, "Box Office Failure".
If it was a failure, why would they specifically point out the box office on an advertisement? I don't recall Gigli, Waterworld, or Ishtar listing their box office take on ads for the home video.

picture.php
WB said that they liked Superman Returns and that it was a hit. Now they say that don't and that they aren't going to make a sequel to it. That stuff means nothing. Studios always say that there movie did well, even when it didn't.

I don't think that anybody is saying that TIH should have done Iron Man or TDK numbers but for what it cost to make Hancock numbers (in the US) would have been nice. Hell, Sex and the City numbers would have been nice too.
 
I don't think this movie was a "failure" but the reason it's box office didn't reflect the quality of the movie was due to the craptacular Ang Lee version. Yes, I'm blaming that.


I compare it to Batman Begins. Begins didn't reflect it's quality in box office, but it had incredible legs and sold a bunch of DVDs, I see Hulk being similar. Now, if they do a Hulk 2 I don't think it'll be as successful as TDK because TDK was just a perfect storm and Batman is much more popular than Hulk.


I think that the Hulk movie was better than Iron Man because to me, Iron Man started out amazing and then felt incredibly generic for the climax. Hulk was the opposite, started out slightly above average then had what I felt was an incredible climax.
 
It was quite the disappointment in terms of box office relevance, i mean is BATMAN really that great so that people favored that movie over IRON MAN or the Incredible HULK? I don't think so.......It has to do with the writer and director, why did they get ZAK PENN to do the story anyways? He had a long record of flopped movies, I'll give commendations on Edward Norton for rewriting the script his dedication to uplift the character from previous depictions is amazing. Letterier did a good job in bringing back the feel of the tv series, but the street fight is not so acceptable it was reminiscent of the transformers movie except that the fight was in the evening. They should make the HULK as a GLOBAL phenomenon and his unbridled fury and strength is as dangerous, so make him go throughout the world and charge the plot with intense greed of the military to get him and harness his power for their own purposes. Throw in the hulk busters robots, the military might of not only the United States, but allow other nation to participate in the hunt for the illusive Incredible Hulk plus let the Leader creep up behind everyone and snatch the Hulk from their grip and use Hulk's power for his own plans. This will show just how his amped up intelligence is as compelling as the Hulk's strength and that both are a derivative of the gamma power. Now for the final touches bring back Abomination forming a loose alliance with the Leader to settle a score with the Hulk, Abomination this time is 50 to 100 times stronger than he was with an old axe to grind against Hulk and the people he cared for the most. So Hulk's final confrontation with his opponents would be more dramatic, more appealing, AND MORE APPROPRIATE FOR HIS NAME SAKE, he should be standing in the middle of the forces of the military, SHIELD, the Leader's hoards and Abomination all at once, but as soon as the dust settles, he'll walk out of it unharmed and saving the day.

P.S. The fight could be in a city or elsewhere as long as we would see Hulk and Abomination throw cars, buses, trucks and tanks at each other. We REALLY NEED to see Hulk and Abomination take a couple of hits from guns, tanks, choppers and planes and be able to get back at them, the director and writer should remember that it is not only important to bring back fans from the 70's so as to bring back the 'man on the run' feel of the tv series. The Incredible Hulk should be introduced to the world as an incredible creature! So go wild and do it like Micheal Bay does he always goes for broke when he makes movies.

Ignore my suggestions and I promise you the next Hulk movie will be his last.
I should sue MARVEL on the Hulk's behalf for screwing up his character.
 
I don't think this movie was a "failure" but the reason it's box office didn't reflect the quality of the movie was due to the craptacular Ang Lee version. Yes, I'm blaming that.


I compare it to Batman Begins. Begins didn't reflect it's quality in box office, but it had incredible legs and sold a bunch of DVDs, I see Hulk being similar. Now, if they do a Hulk 2 I don't think it'll be as successful as TDK because TDK was just a perfect storm and Batman is much more popular than Hulk.


I think that the Hulk movie was better than Iron Man because to me, Iron Man started out amazing and then felt incredibly generic for the climax. Hulk was the opposite, started out slightly above average then had what I felt was an incredible climax.
Well if you poll most folk I'm sure that TIH won't be above Iron Man but to each his own. I liked the film but it wasn't nearly as good as Iron Man or that other Superhero flick.

It's clear the movie's boxoffice can't compare with Batman Begins because Batman Begins had far better legs. Hey, I also blame Ang Lee for alot of this movie's boxoffice problems but I blame the actual movie for others.
 
because of the 03 Hulk the mvoie didnt have a great opening. its called memory.
if the movie is good and if it gets good reviews then it gets peoples attention.
then at the end you have so called ''good word of mout''. if a movie has this then people are going in the theater to make sure if it is true.

so because of the 03 hulk the movie didnt open well. but at the end day if the movie would be good it would get people in the theater days,weeks or months later. i guess it didnt. BO is normal when so many comicbook movies are realesed. but 03 hulk is not responsible for the whole domestic BO.
but hey it has to be someones fault right? if a hardcore comicbook fan likes a movie then its everyones else fault that it didnt make titanic numbers. good help if people just didnt like TIH good enough to make more money.
SR made a lot of money in this day and age. but it didnt make enough with a budget of 200 milions. and its f... superman. TIH also didnt make enough money. why? well because fans bashed so much 03 hulk like it was responsible for cancer,aids,war,....
now a comicbook type,fanboy dream type of hulk makes almost the same amount of money. and now its all ang lees fault.

mu hahhahahahhahahahahahahahaahahah
 
I blame Ang Lee's "Daddy Didn't Love Me" version complete with Hulk poodles.

I also blame Marvel's poor advertising and questionable negative press for this picture as well. If they had pimped this film as half as much as they did Iron Man (which they started a full year in advance), I think it would've made considerably more than it ended up with.

I was telling friends that I knew to go check out the latest one because it was really GOOD but they were turned off by its predecessor and didn't care to bother. Others that I knew, had no idea that another Hulk film was even coming out.
Some of that angst could be attributed to Marvel not stressing that this wasn't a direct sequel to the '03...
 
The film didn't do well, because the Hulk character doesn't appeal to the average movie goer and the fan boys aren't numerous enough to provide a stable base.

I saw the movie three times and enjoyed every minute of it.
 
I honestly believe that the way TIH was presented to the public was unimpressive or should i say not so very glamoruos in certain ways.
MARVEL did a lot more on talking and bragging about how the next film will be, but sadly the records puts it i its place. I AM SO VERY VERY F**KING DISAPPOINTED!!!! 03 Hulk was more impressive despite all the drama, I think people are just looking for someone to put the blame on, Ang did a great work on his take on the Hulk. Ok maybe everyone can say i'm bad mouthing about this film, but basically this is the situation. I am a Hulk fan, i know i've known so little about the character until i started to enjoy and explore the character lately. Heck! I'm still collecting Hulk comic books even as i speak and what, i have like 30 series in my collection, but i want to see the kind of Hulk the way the comic books introduced him to the audience. It's been 5 or 6 years and i've been having day dreams and wild expectations on how high they will take the next film from Ang's rendition and bummer, this is what we get. You guys have read the comic books, you know more than i do how powerful this character is, i was actually expecting them to bring a much better action on the screen than the transformers movie gave the audience. The poster was decieving as well, we get tanks and choppers painted all over the poster and so far i only saw an apache, stark's sonic cannons, some humvees, and some idiot marines. Hellboy could crush Abomination's face with his fist, they should have brought the entire neighborhood down in their brawl. How could they f**k this movie up so bad?
I should have gave up on this charade a long time ago, I think I'll just stick with the comic books from now on. My friends insult me for being a big fan of the Hulk, f**k the critics, give the fans what they want.:cmad:
 
After finally seeing the film and seeing the disappointing box office it is quite clear why this film wasn't successful. People were so horribly turned off by the abomination that was the first film, no pun intended that that they weren't willing to take a chance on this one. I believe something very similiar happened on Batman Begins but that film actually was quite dull and boring to watch. The sequel to TIH should do much much better numbers. Many more ppl will see this on dvd and realize what a terrific film TIH was and forget about Ang Lee's horrible horrible take on it.
 
Why do you think #7 Lapdog? The story line, and actor, makes this look like it is more intense to me, especially since there are no Jellyfish origins involved. This one has a much better feel to the "Doomed to walk the earth Man" feel to it... which I LOVE about the Hulk.
IT was sixth sense.

My intial reaction to it was based on the trailer and the fact the initial trailer had no real sense of plot in it and went on to celebrate the final fight straight away by showing banner jumping out of a plane and then him and abomination running towards each other and leaping at each other like a 90s video game opening sequence.

I never sensed the tragedy it is to be bruce banner or what the curse of the hulk meant to him. I never saw him as a man wrapped in desperation on the run, away from the ones he loves.

I never got that feeling that he hated himself so much he'd kill himself but he couldn't.

In all that, I never got the hulk's sense of freedom, superiority, his sense of being victimised or wanting to be left alone.

He was purely a gimmick to fight abomination.

and I believe i was kinda right in hindsight.
 
I don't see why everyone is blaming ang. Exactly the same thing that happened for this movie happened for that one.

decent sized opening, poor legs.

In the end it promised to be the definitive hulk film and failed to bring any real depth to the character. It also promised alot from its advertising and cgi and it wasn't that great, certainly not the best effects i've ever come across which is what they were saying.

in all it felt like a filler to get an avengers movie ball rolling. The proof of the pudding is the lack of interest in getting a sequel made for it. It it was a real big sucess, they would have made money and time to capitalise on another sequel.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"