PhotoJones
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2005
- Messages
- 24,050
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Really. But more in a lady in the street but a freak in the bed type of situation.
I hate Usher.![]()
I got more of the innocent, wide eyed vibe to me.
Really. But more in a lady in the street but a freak in the bed type of situation.
I hate Usher.![]()
I got more of the innocent, wide eyed vibe to me.

That's because you're a naive love drunk fool.![]()
If anyone deosn't like Mary Jane, I would recommend the latest Sensational Spider-Man Annual. It'll make you a fan.
That was really, really good.
iloveclones said:But I still pick Gwendy.
I thought it was awesome, and it would definitely makes fans out of non-true believers, however, was I the only one who thought gwen came across as a complete social and superficial b***h?If anyone doesn't like Mary Jane, I would recommend the latest Sensational Spider-Man Annual. It'll make you a fan.
Seeing Bryce made me want her (the natural Red Head) as MJ over (the natural Blonde) Dunst who should have taken a dive of the bridge in SM and never floated back up.What did everyone think of Bryce's performance as Gwen?
The character could've had more screen time, but I think she pulled off Gwen's personality very well. That and she looked like she walked out of a comic book page; she was stunning.
I thought it was awesome, and it would definitely makes fans out of non-true believers, however, was I the only one who thought gwen came across as a complete social and superficial b***h?
No, not at all. MJ and Gwen were, real sorry for this but they were like the Paris Hilton of their time. They liked to go dancing, be at parties etc. So going to the Coffee Bean or whatever would probably be very boring to them.
Thats why I said "of their time" PJ, lets get those reading comprehension skills working mmmk.

Both MJ and Gwen seemed kind of shallow and vacant in the first flashback. Of course, Peter and Harry didn't seem too much better. It felt like Fraction went a little overboard writing them to each of their respective stereotypes--except Gwen, who was a bit more self-centered and obnoxious than the sweet girl-next-door stereotype I thought she was supposed to embody.

Except Ivanka Trump is fat and ugly.
Regardless, the comparison still stands. They would be bored to tears by some coffee shop.
Uh...I suppose the hotness of Ivanka is subjective, but most people would disagree with you...a lot.
And being bored at a coffee shop has nothing to do with anything. You said MJ was the Hilton of today. I corrected you, and now you're defending your poorly thought out comparison.
I thought everybody at Marvel collectively decided to forget about that. No writer has ever referenced it since. Plus, it's not like Gwen was a filthy, streetwalking harlot here like she was in "Sins Past." She was just a little vapid. Maybe her blondness caught up to her that day.Yeah, that doesn't exist anymore. Where were you when Gwen gave Norman Osborn pity sex?
Its our where were you when JFK got shot.![]()
In the sense that they're both party girls. I never said she was a dumb **** like Paris Hilton. The comparison is still valid. We can do this all day.
So, by that logic, a filet mignon in the 60's the same as a McDonald's hamburger of today. They're both beef, so there must not be a better analogy.
Get some new logic.

Wow, that's ******ed.![]()

It's basically what you originally said, with some words interchanged. To you, there's no difference between a smart, intelligent girl who likes parties and a sloppy, dumb drunkard. But hey, they both like parties, right?![]()
They're both socialites, and they represent their times. When Mary Jane popped on the scene drunk ****s were not the norm, it is today. But they both pretty much represent the same thing, I mean look at Edie Sedgwick, thats pretty much what Mary Jane was, except for the drugs and Andy Warhol and Bob Dylan.![]()