Who's Hotter, Scarlett (Rachel Nichols) or Baroness (Sienna Miller)?

[UnionJack]

Miller had the better cleavage. There's something about smaller boobs yet perky that make it sexier cleavage.

And Nichols on the treadmill. Good God.

I think that padding helped out Miller quite abit .. but hay looked good.

The treadmill scene was totally thrown in for us guys to droll over .. shame that tool Wayne had to ruin it by slimming all over her bloody creep.

 

[UnionJack]

sshhhhhwwwiiiinnnnnggggggg t:

now THAT is a body, toned and busty.

looking almost as good as Scarlett Johansson

 

[Tex]

i voted scarlett because those **** were just amazing.

 

[PyroChamber]

Are there any other female G.I. Joe characters they could being for a sequel, or are Scarlett and Baroness the main two? I kinda figured Cover Girl wasn't that big of a character anyway.

 

[Avalanche™]

baroness is hotter, but nichols is hotter.

does that make any sense???

 

[UnionJack]

baroness is hotter, but nichols is hotter.

does that make any sense???

as in ones hotter in film world the other in real life?

 

[zanos]

I never saw the film so I have no idea who's character is hotter. Based on pure looks it's definately goes to Rachel. She's literally a 10 and much better looking than Karolina Kurkova, especially in the face. Sienna is of course beautiful but I am already beginning to see signs of aging on her and she's only 28. She looks like she could be 33 whereas Rachel looks more like she could be 23 and yet both are the same age.

 

[Neptune]

I never saw the film so I have no idea who's character is hotter. Based on pure looks it's definately goes to Rachel. She's literally a 10 and much better looking than Karolina Kurkova, especially in the face. Sienna is of course beautiful but I am already beginning to see signs of aging on her and she's only 28. She looks like she could be 33 whereas Rachel looks more like she could be 23 and yet both are the same age.

How does she look 33? Not saying your wrong, i'm just curious.

 

[DACrowe]

well i have to say that in the movie they are equally hot. So i'll vote tie. While Nichols clearly has the better body (a 10), Miller is still a knock out and with the dark hair and incredibly sexy tight leather outfits (I loved the skin tight dress she wore when she came home to her "loving" husband near the beginning) she is equal to Nichols. In real life Nichols is still a 10, so she wins that. Honestly both are way hotter than Megan Fox who looks like she comes from a very different style of filmmaking and somehow ended up in a summer blockbuster by accident.

Just my opinion.

 

[terry78]

Are there any other female G.I. Joe characters they could being for a sequel, or are Scarlett and Baroness the main two? I kinda figured Cover Girl wasn't that big of a character anyway.

Lady Jaye, who's more of a tomboy type, and Zarana, Zartan's sister.

 

[tamron]

Are there any other female G.I. Joe characters they could being for a sequel, or are Scarlett and Baroness the main two? I kinda figured Cover Girl wasn't that big of a character anyway.

Lady Jaye, who's more of a tomboy type, and Zarana, Zartan's sister.

Other females would be Jinx, a Joe who is Storm Shadow's cousin and trained in ninjitsu by Snake Eyes, and Agent Helix, a new character that appeared in the GI Joe movie game and IDW comic.

 

[Matt.S99]

Cover girl shouldnt stay dead dammit!

 

[terry78]

There were a couple scenes where Scarlett looked ridiculously stunning, I mean I got why Ripcord was trying to hit that.

 

[Son Of Logan]

In real life I find Sienna Miller so....eh. But on film she always looks so amazing. I couldn't get my mind off the Baroness the whole film.

 

[UnionJack]

There were a couple scenes where Scarlett looked ridiculously stunning, I mean I got why Ripcord was trying to hit that.

trying?!?!!
he literally forced himself on her

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

Tie for me, I loved them both.

 

[MiniBond]

tie for me too....and the movie didn't help to choose !

 

[Mr. Earle]

I wouldn't say fugly but with her natural hair it doesn't complement her face. She is half way to a butter face. My vote goes to Rachel Nichols. I just find her more attractive than Miller and looked damn good with red hair. Plus she has some amazing cleavage. All I have to say is white tank top in the plane scene near the beginning of the film.

You must be mad! She is gorgeous either way. But as Raiden says:

Sienna Miller is a blonde, but she looks way hotter as a brunette, either as Baroness or as the love interest of Heath Ledger in the movie Cassanova. But it is hard to decide which one is hotter between her and Rachel Nichols, though.

Personally i loved geeky Scarlett and i generally love redheads, but Baroness was simply irresistible!

 

[King K]

Not even an contest Sienna hands down. I too love red-heads and Nichols is georgous but Sienna Miller is on another level of hotness.

 

[Fresh Prince]

Rachel Nichols

 

[BLU8]

This is a REALLY close one, but I'm gonna have to go with Scarlett.

 

[zanos]

Rachel looked amazing in the film with her deep red hair, but for chrissakes did they have to put so much blush on her?

 

[Timstuff]

Yeah, the blush looked kind of crazy in the on-set interview. I think the only reason they used that much was because it wouldn't have shown up in the stage lighting otherwise (depending on the kind of light, certain colors get washed out or muted).

 

[zanos]

Why is it so important that Scarlett have rosy cheeks anyway? That's a question no one seemed to have asked themselves when they were busy turning her into bozo the clown.

 

[Raiden]

I thought Baroness looked sexier in the movie than Scarlett (except during that treadmill scene...hubba hubba). However, in real life I think Rachel Nichols is hotter than Sienna Miller. I just don't like Scarlett was being flirted upon by Rip/Wayne, because she is supposed to be with Snakeyes.