Spider - Man
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 1,472
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I think it's that the fact that the film-makers, and a great deal of posters here, didn't understand or cannot appreciate that fact that a huge portion of this film's audience were going to find a shot like that "off" and "unnecessary". And I know it's a very brief shot, but it's in there, INTENTIONALLY, not by accident and not as a throwaway shot.
Well of course it was intentional. I don't think ANYONE here has suggested that the shot wound up in the movie accidentally! Raimi watchin final cut: "Hey, how'd THAT shot get in there?!!"
It was a conscious and planned decision to use what may be the biggest film of the year to push a political image.
From everything I've heard about Raimi, he is as sweet a person as you could want to meet, ergo I don't think he'd put in an image to push a 'political image' to upset a large group of people. I think it more likely that he was trying to pull together some pro-American sentiment within America because Amnerica really needs that right now.
I think what's winding most protractors up is the fact that those championing the shot "don't get" why some won't like it to the point where you're getting angry at the protractors for not conforming.
And I know "Spider-man's American!!! What do you want!?!" well yes, Spider-man's an American, but he's also incredibly popular as a character because he appeals to such a massive amount of people around the world, because Peter Parker could be any teenager - that's what makes the character great. And the character's success is attributed to that appeal, so gettin on a high horse and proclaiming Spider-man as 'your hero' as such, I think, is a little bit short sighted and ignorant - a sort of "DON'T ARGUE, HE'S NOT YOUR HERO TO FOLLOW AND LOVE".
Nobody wants to change his costume or the city he lives in cuz they're part of that appeal, they are elements that were there from day one and don't carry the baggage of a singular political point but are rather just the canon of the character, but a ****ing giant waving CGI flag does come with that baggage and the fact is, the film-makers should have known better.
My 2 cents.
I never said Spidey was 'ours'. In fact, I think I clearly stated (about 100 or so pages back!) that he WASN'T mine to 'share'. I know I've used the James Bond analogy before because it fits and I can't really think of another popular Brittish character so loved by so much of the world. Bond is pure escapist fantasy. When a man watches a James Bond movie, he wishes he could be James Bond. I MYSELF would rather be James Bond than Spider-Man, BUT I never got bent out of shape during the opening credits of The Spy Who Loved Me when it showed Bond superimposed against the brittish flag (which took up the entire screen btw). The thought never even crossed my mind. I didn't feel 'left out'. I didn't feel like I was taken out of the movie just because I couldn't get my mind off the fact that Bond was linked with the Union Jack. The American flag is not, and does not represent, a 'singular political point', just like the Union Jack doesn't represent the IRA.
I guess I can understand this sentiment from English people over the flag considering, as one poster said earlier, an English citizen gets labeled racist now for displaying the Union Jack in their own country! Truly sad! I am sounding off on this board because I don't want to see this happen in America. I'd hope that more people, especially American people, could understand THAT!
