Ummm...what does the nature of democracy have to do with the flag shot in Spider-Man 3.
I think this thread is off topic and has become a politics thread. It needs a close.
To debate the nature of democracy and America, go to a politics thread.
The previous movies had it and therefore this should be a non issue.
In SM3 the flag was just distracting and unnecessary. We know Peter got his act together and will save MJ no matter what. We don't need to get hit with a giant flag over the head to get the point. It's like with the news reporter someone else mentioned. We know that he gets the crap beat out of him, she doesn't have to tell us what we already see.
Did anyone ***** about the flagshot at the end of the first movie? I'm not about to wade through 20 pages worth of crap to find out.
Spider-Man is to Marvel what Superman is to DC. Nobody had any problems with Superman and all his flag shots back in the 70's & 80's - if you ask me, the Superman Returns fans should be wondering why "The American Way" phrase wasn't touched on at all in Superman Returns... yeah, he's a savior for the whole world, but "Truth, Justice, and the American Way" has been his tagline since the beginning. It's always nice to see Spidey pick up the slack where Superman falls short...![]()
well apparently it is for some people. if i were in charge of the cuts for the trailers and tv spots and were to include the flag shot, you damn well better believe i'd leave the flag in there. it's just too bad sony didn't have the balls to leave the shot as is, instead of bowing down to other people's sensitivities.
i guess hey realized the american way is not the one of truth and justice.

And this should get people to think about it. We had a giant flag in the final swing of the first movie, but no one complained. Because it wasn't distracting and it was one of the greatest scenes in the movie.
In SM3 the flag was just distracting and unnecessary. We know Peter got his act together and will save MJ no matter what. We don't need to get hit with a giant flag over the head to get the point. It's like with the news reporter someone else mentioned. We know that he gets the crap beat out of him, she doesn't have to tell us what we already see.
The news reporter was out of place. This is what we should be complaining about. Not a 2 second flag shot.
It was a great moment because it shows that Spidey has returned to save the day.
And that's exactly it. We know he's back to save the day, we don't need a flag to tell us that. Or did they think that the audience as gotten so dumb over the years that they need a visual aid? Without the flag we'd probably thought he got to the construction site by mistake.
Also I don't like the vibe that scene emmits, as if Spidey's rushing into battle with the thoughts "I'll save you MJ. For the country!" He's trying to save the love of his life, don't tell me he's only doing that because it's the american way.
The flag was there to emphasize Spidey's heroic entrance. Not necessarily patriotic - Spider-Man doesn't have the tagline "Truth, Justice, and the American Way". It was there for a heroic effect. Would you rather have the commissioner of the city shine a Spidey-Signal into the sky and have him land in front of that?
Well, considering the thread is about the American flag it was bound to get political, but your right if people want to talk about politics go to a political thread. This thread shouldn't have even been made considering this is the most idiotic thing to focus on. The flag was in the shot for like 2 seconds and everyone gets all riled up just because it's the American Flag. The previous movies had it and therefore this should be a non issue.