James"007"Bond said:Your missing the point.
Its not about sandman being a "bigger" villain than venom. If you paid any attention at all, you'd be aware that venom is being pushed as a marketing device over sandman...BIG TIME.
Venom in this movie is gradually being developed 'till we get him but until then we're getting an already existing plot device in Harry seeking revenge and sandman for the obvious reason that he's a born criminal who gets ahold of some powers and starts his massacre mission right away.
God, some spidey "fans" try, empahsis on try to think too damn hard that they completely forgo any sort of chronological thought.![]()
I agree, except I think that Sandman will still be the bigger villian come the credits. You need a main villian throughout the film... Harry has a huge internal struggle that will lead him to become GG2 during the film, and Venom needs to establish a rivalry between Parker and Brock first... while this character development is being put into place, you need something else to drive the plot, and that's why we have Sandman, who will be the main villian with his own personal motivations that will be established early on. Otherwise (especially for the Superman Returns haters) you have Spider-man for half the film but not a villian for him... and while I love character development and stories that focus on exposition, a vast majority of people would just say that its boring.
