The Amazing Spider-Man With Great Power, Comes Great Lounging - Part 10

She was good in Inception. But other than that she annoys me a little. It's not that I dislike her alot but she's the one I'd miss the least if she's not in the next film. I don't get what Nolan sees in her that is above others to be honest. I'd much rather have Anne Hathaway take her place as one of Nolan's new core cast. I didn't like her much before but she was one of the best things in TDKR for sure and she seems great in Les Miserables as well.

Michael Caine is a given, which is confirmed already pretty much. Since Christian Bale is my favourite actor, I wouldn't mind him returning either. I can totally see Bale as a very smart villain, that would be cool! I don't know if Bale's ever been a villain before, it would be very interesting to see that!

A return of Hugh Jackman (another one of my favourites) would be cool but maybe it would be too much to have him and Bale in another film together.

Someone mentioned Fassbender in another thread and that would be awesome, he could be a great villain too and he'd fit Nolan's kind of films like a glove! I can also totally see Brad Pitt in a Nolan movie!

No Joseph Gordon-Levitt, please! I'm happy he'll be in GotG, but I don't want to see him in EVERY film and he's not extraordinary great compared to Nolan's other actors. As great as Tom Hardy is, I wouldn't mind to see him replaced this time.

Viggo Mortensen is another interesting actor! And, Swedish as I am, I'd love to see Peter Stormare in a Nolan film!

So in other words:

Keep Michael Caine and Anne Hathaway. Keep Christian Bale, but only if given a more unlikely and fresh role this time such as the villain of the film. The rest should be new ones.

I like most of Nolan's core cast but I hope he tries out new actors,its gets repeatitive
Sometimes he lets his biasness with the actors get ahead of itself,I think there could have been a better cast for both Bane and Talia
 
You think people would understand that this isn't a new thing with directors having these collaborators that they enjoy working with. It's as silly as saying Nolan should not be partnering up with Warner Brothers, lol.

Remind me again about who was Bashing Raimi for giving his brother a 2 minute role in the Spider-man trilogy?
 
Ted Raimi's role as Hoffman was hilarious. Doesn't Sam give his brother a role in most of his movies? My favorite is Henrietta from Evil Dead II:

evildeadii7.jpg
 
I don't think it would be too much at all with four or five past collaborators in Interstellar, especially if we see Jackman when we only last saw him in Prestige, or maybe bringing back Ellen Page as well. I definitely don't think it will only be guys we saw in Inception and then in TDKR, but maybe people seen in Inception or Prestige.

But, to Gwen Stacy being Webb's actress....I don't really see it, but you never know.

Oh, that I definitely wouldn't mind.

Yeah I don't think that's very likely either, more wishful thinking of my part.
 
Ted Raimi's role as Hoffman was hilarious. Doesn't Sam give his brother a role in most of his movies? My favorite is Henrietta from Evil Dead II:

evildeadii7.jpg

Yeah,But according to Anno Raimi 'invented' the role just for his brother and he was biased and what not
Thats like me saying Nolan invented the John Blake role for JGL
 
Ted is in all of Raimi's movies. Its just... his thing. Sam, Bruce Campbell, and Ted Raimi are always working together. Same way Nolan uses Marion, JGL, or Tom Hardy.

Ted is even going to be in the new Oz movie, and the sequel to "My Name is Bruce."
 
Such a shame that Joseph Gordon Levitt isn't younger, he would've been 110% the perfect choice for Peter Parker
 
Such a shame that Joseph Gordon Levitt isn't younger, he would've been 110% the perfect choice for Peter Parker

Naaah...maybe, but no way near as good as Andrew.

I'd rather say it's a little shame Andrew isn't a little younger because he might look too old for the role in ASM3 unless the character ages more too.
 
Naaah...maybe, but no way near as good as Andrew.

I'd rather say it's a little shame Andrew isn't a little younger because he might look too old for the role in ASM3 unless the character ages more too.
He was older than Maguire when he started playing Spider-Man, yet he looks so much younger. lol

120207spiderman-Andrew-Garfield1.jpg
tobey-maguire-peter-parker-columbia-pictures-spider-man-428920.jpg


They both look older than they should be for the role, don't get me wrong. But Andrew has that "baby-ish" face that lets him get away with it IMO.
 
004SPT_Tobey_Maguire_120.jpg


Look at Tobey in Spider-Man 2, which is basically Andrew's age in TASM.
 
No doubt Clark Kent is a little relatable but Superman as such is ridiculously non-relatable

I dont seperate out the Superhero and the face-behind persona,I see them together

You must separate the two as you just now say Clark Kent is relatable, even if you say a little and so is Peter Parker. The superhero personas of Spider-Man and Superman are not, so you must see how the person behind the hero is.

Remind me again about who was Bashing Raimi for giving his brother a 2 minute role in the Spider-man trilogy?

Why do I bash Raimi's brother? Because Hoffman was unnecessary, not funny and was a bore to watch. Not liking a character is far different from appreciating collaborations.
 
Why do I bash Raimi's brother? Because Hoffman was unnecessary, not funny and was a bore to watch. Not liking a character is far different from appreciating collaborations.

Hoffman just added to my enjoyment of the Bugle scenes. Always looked forward to seeing him and Jameson interact.
 
Such a shame that Joseph Gordon Levitt isn't younger, he would've been 110% the perfect choice for Peter Parker

I dont think so
Was never impressed by his acting

Look wise I always thought the guy who plays Edmund Pevensie in Narnia movies was perfect,but he doesnt act much apart from those movies

rtuk_feature_skandar_keynes_01.jpg
 
Last edited:
Such a shame that Joseph Gordon Levitt isn't younger, he would've been 110% the perfect choice for Peter Parker

He has good genes,I remember seeing a photograph of Andrew from 2005 and he looked exactly the same as he looks now
 
Why do I bash Raimi's brother? Because Hoffman was unnecessary, not funny and was a bore to watch. Not liking a character is far different from appreciating collaborations.

Many people think John Blake's character was unnecessary,its no reason to bash the director and accuse him of 'inventing' the role for his family

You didnt find him funny,that your opinion,but we already see 4 people here that did.He was made a part of the Bugle staff which was always supposed to have 4-5 people,Raimi wanted to utilize The Daily Bugle for comic relief and Ted Raimi was perfect for that Role
 
He looks strange with shorter hair. Is it just me, or does he look older without it?

154426_aff187cf3d183587adae7f8109edde8e.jpg
 
He looks strange with shorter hair. Is it just me, or does he look older without it?

154426_aff187cf3d183587adae7f8109edde8e.jpg

He looks older and he looks ridiculous with a bald head
He grew a beard for No-shave november and he looked 10 years older than he normally looks
 
He looks strange with shorter hair. Is it just me, or does he look older without it?

154426_aff187cf3d183587adae7f8109edde8e.jpg
He almost has my bald rivers at the top
Something I can relate to with Andrew Garfield, that's pretty cool
 
Hoffman just added to my enjoyment of the Bugle scenes. Always looked forward to seeing him and Jameson interact.

I found Hoffman cringeworthy bad. And I'd rather prefer just more comedy between Jameson and Brant anyways.

Many people think John Blake's character was unnecessary,its no reason to bash the director and accuse him of 'inventing' the role for his family

So now you're saying a version of Robin is as bad as a created Daily Bugle staff character?

You didnt find him funny,that your opinion,but we already see 4 people here that did.He was made a part of the Bugle staff which was always supposed to have 4-5 people,Raimi wanted to utilize The Daily Bugle for comic relief and Ted Raimi was perfect for that Role

Four people...uh-oh, now I'm afraid to say what else I didn't like! :whatever:
 
I found Hoffman cringeworthy bad. And I'd rather prefer just more comedy between Jameson and Brant anyways.
I liked his interactions with the ENTIRE Daily Bugle staff. Haven't seen anything cringeworthy in those scenes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"