Wolfman-The Offical Thread

Rate the movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The frenetic pace concerns me a bit. I hope there's additional footage they can add in to slow the movie down a bit and perhaps develop some subplots.

The predictability of the movie and the poorness of the CGI doesn't surprise me at all.

I'm glad that the reviewer liked The Wolfman in spite of these flaws. It gives me hope.
 
I don't see what everyone's moaning about the CGI for... it looks pretty damn good to me. Better than TIH's.
 
Looks pretty "meh" and flat compared to Ricks Make-up, that is the issue some people are taking with it.
 
That review bothers me. The film was completed a while ago, why is there an unfinished copy being shown? How old is this interview?
 
i cant wait to see this, this is what you call a wolfman
 
I don't see any problem with the cgi either. I don't even see which parts of the transformation shots are cgi! The fingers popping in weird direction is NOT cgi, that I know. What is the problem?
 
The twisting hand (an effect I hate) is definitely CG, I don't know how you cannot tell physical effects apart from CG.
 
I have to be the only person who isn't worried at all about this film. Because of all the reshoots, it's no surprise to me that Elfman dropped the project. That stuff takes time. You have to re-edit the film and make sure all is well, then drop the score on top of that. All the delays and reshoots culminated in this. Elfman probably couldn't find time to re-score and write new compositions for the film.

The new composer is from Tangerine Dream. Need i point out the score they did for "Near Dark"? awesome stuff.

They didn't really betray Baker, either. They brought him in to do make-up effects, not special effects. Not to mention, he's all for CGI as well.

This film is in the right hands and will turn out fine. I learned to stop overhyping myself with The Dark Knight(yea, that's right), and this film is no exception. But i firmly think this film is gonna be damn good. If it's a miss, it's because it's not blood, guts and gore, but an intelligent, atmospheric, scary film. Regardless of quality, I can appreciate it at face value for simply not being yet another crappy slasher film or torture film. This is FINALLY a return to monsters.


Agreed.
 
I don't see what everyone's moaning about the CGI for... it looks pretty damn good to me. Better than TIH's.

review:

http://www.brutalashell.com/2009/10/an-early-look-at-the-wolfman/

Wolfman (2010)
Dir:
Joe Johnston
Review by: Dustin Hall

“Don’t look to the past, Lawrence. It’s nothing but a wilderness of horrors.”

I just got back from the first public screening of next year’s to-be-released The Wolfman, starring Benicio Del Toro and Anthony Hopkins. I’ll try to be as in-depth and spoiler free as I can manage. The Wolfman wastes no time, and neither shall I. Let’s dive right in.

...

...

...

the-wolf-man-movie-19.jpg

The Wolfman himself looks great, and I was very happy to see Rick Baker get a chance to use practical effects on the creation, rather than a CG monster stinking up the screen. Compared to the modern, sleek-looking film techniques of Wolfman, seeing a two-legged dog guy on the screen is a little odd. The design is definitely a throwback to the original film, and despite the better make-up effects now, still looks a little dated. This is advantageous in other regards, as the interesting design of the werewolves of Dog Soldiers and Ginger Snaps, or even Monster Squad, required a lot of rubber prosthetics, and virtually no movement capability for the creature. This is a fully animated wolfman, running and roaring all across the screen. And happily, his four-legged running style looks a lot better than Liev Schreiber in the Wolverine movie.

Despite Rick Baker’s involvement with the film, and his insistence on practical effects, there’s a surprising amount of computer imagery in the film. Most of it, as with the transformation sequences, blends well and looks good. The transformations are generally subtle until the last one that, in full lighting with virtually no cutaway, worked surprisingly well. You can tell a lot of time and care went into it. However, a couple moments where the Gypsy pets – a bear in particular – were CG’d into the film look awful, and even got laughs from the audience while they were on the screen. One can only hope Universal fixes this before the final release. Why can’t we just get trained animals anymore?


...

...
icon14.gif
 
International 'The Wolfman' One Sheet



The Wolfman hits theaters February 12, 2010.
 
However, a couple moments where the Gypsy pets – a bear in particular – were CG’d into the film look awful, and even got laughs from the audience while they were on the screen. One can only hope Universal fixes this before the final release. Why can’t we just get trained animals anymore

Something tells me they won't be. These days, scenes of incredibly awful cgi manage to stay that way even in films with otherwise great effects (the claws in Wolverine & the Hummer grill in GI Joe for instance) Anyway, if the bear fights the Wolfman in that scene, you really can't blame them for going the CGI route. But it seems as silly as the CGI wolves in the day after tomorrow.

i agree
the wolfman in this pwns the cgi crap in van helsing

I dunno. I think if you took a werewolf from every werewolf movie in say the past 10 years, the VH ones would slaughter the rest.
 
Sounds good, but the running time is really, really short, and I kind of hope they fill in a little of the extra stuff for the theatrical release.

I also had the feeling the story was going to be predictable (does anyone really have much doubt who the other werewolf is?).

I think what I'm most interested in is the good cast and the fact that it apparently doesn't hold back on the horror.
 
What? Why? This is more concerning... either really good or really bad.
 
This is actually good and bad.

Good in the sense that these editors are some of the best in the business so they'll be able to create something that will be better than whatever they currently have.

The bad news is that Johnston apparently had a hard time with this. I'm really starting to get worried about Captain America now. :(
 
Walter Murch?:up: This movie, if it was bad before, is now saved. How can this even possibly be bad news? Only good things can come of this.
 
I hope he can do something about the pace of the film.
 
The new poster is very cool, as for the edit's.....I'll wait and see but it's worrying that it has come to this.
 
Walter Murch?:up: This movie, if it was bad before, is now saved. How can this even possibly be bad news? Only good things can come of this.

You cannot kick-start a dead horse.

It doesn't matter the editor's skill, if there's no foundation to work with, it'll still be a failure. Hopefully there's enough footage for the guy to make things work, but I'm losing faith in this film rapidly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,396
Messages
22,097,080
Members
45,893
Latest member
DooskiPack
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"