The Amazing Spider-Man Worst, most annoying suggestions you've heard

[General Fury]

While a man make of living sand had a "real" feel to it?

the whole thing with that was so convenient

 

[TheSlag]

Hey, I think Church did an excellent job with the role. I think he is an Excellent actor. And I think the sequence where "Sandy" was born was excellent, visually.


I just did not care for how the character was written. And I just do not care for ole Sandy period.

As far as convienent, if that is your way of saying lazy approach to writing, I gotta agree with you.

 

[General Fury]

Hey, I think Church did an excellent job with the role. I think he is an Excellent actor. And I think the sequence where "Sandy" was born was excellent, visually.


I just did not care for how the character was written. And I just do not care for ole Sandy period.

As far as convienent, if that is your way of saying lazy approach to writing, I gotta agree with you.

Church did do a very good job, the set-up of the scene was very good to, it was just the overall of not fitting in with the spidey universe that Raimi had created in the past two films

 

[Venom'sDad]

suggestions that venom (and worse, carnage) should appear in future SM movies. UGH!

Look, there's really nothing wrong with Venom, Carnage, or any other villain for that matter. It's all about understanding the character, proper usage of the character, and WRITING.... area that Sam & Co. failed at. I have gotten positive comments on my usage of Carnage in my "Spidey4 Story"; although understandably, most don't want to see Sam handle another Symbiote in a future Spidey film. Neitherless, Sam & Co. has failed in all three categories with Sandman & Eddie/Symbiote/Venom, and in certain occasions with Harry(in SM3) and DocOck(mainly the end).

That, and the dreaded R word...Reboot, have been the worst.

It's obvious Sony won't reboot, so I don't see this as an issue. What's annoying to me is that after three film, people still insist Sam do more. They tend to not see how flawed Sam's style is for Spiderman.... especially since he really don't understand these characters.

 

[chaseter]

The most annoying suggestions I have heard are:

Shia for Peter Parker................................NO
Carnage
Venom to come back and be in another movie

 

[Minus Shock]

that's the mistake he made with Sandman.

True but he also screwed up a Villain he knew nothing about. So Sandman, who he loved, was a miss, and Venom, who he knew nothing about, was screwed up beyond belief... what can Raimi do? Bringing back Doc Ock may not be a bad idea since this was the villain he had most success with.

 

[Infinity9999x]

I saw this thread over at the Batman boards and it inspired me to make one here.

- Rebooting the franchise. Yes let's reboot a SUCCESSFUL franchise, whose third film is the second highest grossing superhero film behind The Dark Knight. Yeah these people have no logic.


- To make the film dark like The Dark Knight when Spider-man is NOT a dark character nor is the Spider-man universe.

On the question of TDK issue,

I think a lot of people have been getting confused when they hear people saying SM4 should be more like TDK, or that SM4 should take ideas from TDK. I do think SM4 should take ideas from TDK, but the things I want SM4 to take from TDK aren't tone, or making it a darker movie. I want SM4 to have the same intelligent and thoughtfull storytelling that TDK did, and the same devotion and staying true to it's characters that TDK did.

That's what I think most people want. However, the second I hear people saying they want SM4 to be darker to match TDK, I just roll my eyes, because that is a dumb idea.

However, on the reboot issue, I was hoping we would get a reboot, eventually at least. There are a lot of things that Raimi has done wrong that I would like fixed in another incarnation of the character. When I watch Spectacular Spider-man, I find myself even more frustrated with the movies. Now, I know that SS can do things Raimi can't, given the differences in the nature of the medium they are using. However, There is no reason Raimi couldn't show the accuracy in displaying the true nature of the characters SS does.

 

[BobJM]

1. Switching MJ with Gwen
2. Any recasts
3. Kraven & Mysterio (hate them both)
4. Symbiotes
5. Ben's killer having any sort of significant role

 

[Bubastis]

the inclusion of carnage, black cat, or a villain who's already been used, especially if they're dead.

 

[Spiderine]

1. Any aforementioned return from the dead characters.

2. Bruce Campbell as Mysterio.

3. Any more changes to the night Uncle Ben died.

4. A sinister six cheeseball fest.

5. Any more mention of Aunt Carnage, joke or no joke.

6. Another Venom of any kind.

7. This version of Gwen being thrown from a bridge.

8. The Leader of the Daily Bugle allstar comedy team creating Scorpion.

9. Anymore oddball team up suggestions like Scorpion and Mysterio or others.

10. Clone sagas of any kind.

 

[General Fury]

The most annoying suggestions I have heard are:

Shia for Peter Parker................................NO
Carnage
Venom to come back and be in another movie

NEVAH!!!!

 

[Minus Shock]

What is the appeal of him really?

 

[The Joker]

Shia is ridiculously overrated.

 

[Minus Shock]

You aint kidding. Don't get me wrong, once upon a time I thought the kid had potential to be a great actor, but everything he's been in so far has just not impressed me at all. Some could blame the material, but he agreed to do whatever it is. I thought Disturbia was pretty good, but aside from that, nothing I can think of that really stretched his acting chops. I don't see the attraction thing either. I don't get it.

 

[zeptron]

Shia is ridiculously overrated.

Not as overrated as his Transformers co-star. God, I'm so sick of seeing her suggested for EVERY effin female role that needs casting.

 

[Spiderine]

Shia is a decent actor and I have enjoyed some of his other roles such as Disturbia and Eagle Eye. I wouldn't say he would have done a better job as Peter Parker but I think he could have pulled it off.

 

[Minus Shock]

Not as overrated as his Transformers co-star. God, I'm so sick of seeing her suggested for EVERY effin female role that needs casting.

Well she just want's to be in a movie where she can act apparently.

 

[The Joker]

She's the new flavour of the month. And it has nothing to do with her 'acting skills'.

 

[General Fury]

Shia is ridiculously overrated.

For certain

She's the new flavour of the month. And it has nothing to do with her 'acting skills'.

that's for sure

 

[ND Irish]

nothin wrong w/ that

 

[Agent 194]

Annoying suggestion or not....reboot needed or not...I'd love to see a fresh approach,...as in not making it another weepy eyed 'I love Mary Jane' story.

 

[ND Irish]

agreed completely. please no crying unless its absolutely required

 

[chaseter]

Not as overrated as his Transformers co-star. God, I'm so sick of seeing her suggested for EVERY effin female role that needs casting.

Welcome to two years ago when Elisha Cuthbert was ****ing suggested for everything.

 

[Immortalfire]

Welcome to two years ago when Elisha Cuthbert was ****ing suggested for everything.

Hell yes she was.

Felicia Hardy? OMG ELISHA CUTHBERT!!!!!!!!

Deb Whitman? OMG ELISHA CUTHBERT!!!!!!!!

Electro? OMG ELISHA CUTHBERT!!!!!!!!

:facepalm

 

[Spider-Who?]

some one mentioned giving spidey his trademark humor as an annoying suggestion. I gotta disagree. its the lame ideas for jokes that posters spout forth that are annoying. and whats worse is that they are 95% accepted by fellow posters as genuinely funny lines. ug.

Spidey needs his quips/sarcasm. Hell, I'd even take ONE scene where we see his "light heartedness" and humor come into play. Just one. And no, "Here's your change!" does NOT count.