The Amazing Spider-Man Worst, most annoying suggestions you've heard

One word: Hobgoblin. Seriously, WTF?

61741173311060999147473.jpg
 
My biggest annoyance is people who know literally nothing about Spider-man, but just kind of know of Venom, Carnage etc and are dying for them. I get effin tired of hearing "Bring in Carnage!!!" My best friend in the world is guilty of that.

Can someone tell me what this fascination is with Carnage in the first place please? So he kills people like T-1000, big whoop. I just don't understand the draw that he has with non-comic readers. It's really bizarre.

Thank you.

To that extent, I was on this for a while about how Venom would not work in the Spider-Man movies

and if you made a Spider-Man movie where a character like Venom worked, you'd have a film like Underworld; lots of a flash with no substance.
 
Yeah it does.


....no, it doesnt. To me any way, cause, you know, my standards are a little higher than a 2nd graders attempts at puns.

When nearly every person (ally or villain) a character ever faces makes at least one comment on his sarcasm, humor, inability to shut his mouth etc; you KNOW it is an important part of that characters personality, and therefore should be considered just as much as his/her costume/any other character trait.

This has NOT been done in any of the Spider-Man films. One or two comments that can BARELY be considered as an attempt to be funny do NOT count as an inclusion of a character's personality traits.

Spider-Man is a smart ass, a clown, a funny guy who could do stand up if he wanted to. He never shuts up and will either make you groan with annoyance, or laugh till you piss yourself (depending on Spidey's intent of the humor).

I enjoy the flicks, for a time, they were my favorite movies, but after 3 attempts to fully realize the character, I'm tired of them ALMOST getting it right. I really think that some of the better Spider-Man comic writers should look over the new script and be allowed to make suggestions/additions to Spidey's dialogue, because they -if anyone- know how to write him. but sadly, that'll never happen, because, well, its a good idea.
 
Spider-man being rated R....really? Come on people. -sigh-

Also, venom and carnage...these are TERRIBLE characters. I could at least tolerate venom but carnage is too much, hes such a lame character
 
Being rated R.

Venom returning. HE IS DEAD. And why would you bring him back? I want to move onto newer villains.

Carnage, I just hate him

Making it dark or gritty like TDK

SM is something for everyone, it doesn't isolate anybody.
 
I wouldn't mindseeing Hobgoblin since he's my favorite villain in the Spidey universe.

The worst suggestion i've heard is Black Cat. I just don't think it's the right time.
 
Reboot just because most people thought 3 was just mediocre and not omfg amazing. There are plenty people who loved it, so rebooting it is a fail suggestion.

Sinister Six

Carnage without Venom=fail

Acting like 3 never existed

Nolan to direct

No Tobey or Kirsten
 
Yeah, re-booting would just suck. I think the GA would be mad, seeing as how they atleast tolerated Spidey 3 enough to get it over 300 mil domestic.

Sinister Six would be horrible for Spidey 4, since none of the characters have been introduced (& not killed afterwards) except Sandman but he's a good guy now.
 
1. MJ death
2. Venom
3. Carnage
4. The Dark Spidey
5. Suggestions of more than 2 villains

About covers it.
 
1. MJ death
2. Venom
3. Carnage
4. The Dark Spidey
5. Suggestions of more than 2 villains

About covers it.

This reminds me I do get a little annoyed when people keep saying only one villain from now on because SM3 was "overcrowded."

The problem with SM3 wasn't the amount of villains. It was the execution. All three villains had different storylines that had nothing to do with each other so they had to cram all three arcs into one film.

Movies like Batman Returns, Batman Begins, and The Dark Knight show that multiple villains can be worked into the same storyline. Like how Sandman and Vulture were originally going to share the same plotline with Vulture making Sandman do all his dirty work. Sadly we'll never know how that would have turned out.

No other villain can carry his own film. So I would expect at least two from now on. Besides SM has a lot of good villains and it would be a shame for some of them not to be in a movie because they keep using only villain per movie.
 
This reminds me I do get a little annoyed when people keep saying only one villain from now on because SM3 was "overcrowded."

The problem with SM3 wasn't the amount of villains. It was the execution. All three villains had different storylines that had nothing to do with each other so they had to cram all three arcs into one film.
I agree totally. :up::up::up:

As far as Carnage is concern, I know a good percentage of you either don't like Carnage or don't trust Sam Raimi in doing it and I would agree with both.... mainly because I simply don't trust Raimi period. However there are ways to do Carnage respectfully. Look, many people here have been saying great writing and usage & understanding of these characters is what sorely needed.

Most of Spidey rogue villains would work well on the big screen incorporate with smart writing. I'm annoyed when people say this or that villain won't work versus Sam & Co. don't know how to make it work. Many flamed Nolan & Goyer for choosing Ras, Scare, & Falcone as the villains. Look how that turn out. That's if anything is what I hope Sam takes away from Nolan & Goyer... smart, intelligent writing, mature themes, and usage & understanding of characters. Battles scenes and SFx are good, but that does not carry the film alone, imo.
 
This reminds me I do get a little annoyed when people keep saying only one villain from now on because SM3 was "overcrowded."

The problem with SM3 wasn't the amount of villains. It was the execution. All three villains had different storylines that had nothing to do with each other so they had to cram all three arcs into one film.

Movies like Batman Returns, Batman Begins, and The Dark Knight show that multiple villains can be worked into the same storyline. Like how Sandman and Vulture were originally going to share the same plotline with Vulture making Sandman do all his dirty work. Sadly we'll never know how that would have turned out.

No other villain can carry his own film. So I would expect at least two from now on. Besides SM has a lot of good villains and it would be a shame for some of them not to be in a movie because they keep using only villain per movie.
:up::up::up::up::up::up:
I actually want Sinister Six for SM6, if they get to 6. With the proper execution they can pull it off. And if they don't, who cares? It's the last one. :hehe:
 
Ugh...now the crazy fanboys say ScarJo as Black Cat:dry:
 
Being rated R.

Venom returning. HE IS DEAD. And why would you bring him back? I want to move onto newer villains.

Carnage, I just hate him

Making it dark or gritty like TDK

SM is something for everyone, it doesn't isolate anybody
.

agreed %100
 
This is weird and random....Puff Daddy?:huh:

From Rashad lewis's twitter page:
Breaking new P. Diddy just hit and told me to be on the look out for Halloween 2 this year and spider-man 4 next year real talk I can wait
7:12 PM Jul 20th from TwitterFon
http://***********/RASHADLEWIS

:huh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"