Would You Have Prefered a Smallville Movie?

Would You Have Prefered a Smallville Movie?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
the belief and opinion presently seems to be that that you may be the one who created the video in question and seems to return every few weeks with a new alias preteding to be oblivious and then dropping it in there just to flaunt it.
 
Kaboom said:
no no...i get that. i mean i dont get
1. how anyone can find the video funny.
2. why he keeps coming back.

Oh, gotcha...

I'm severely sleep deprived and slow on the uptake lately...

(damn job...)

I have no idea why anyone would keep coming back to trumpet the creation of something so disgustingly mean spirited...

It totally boggles but being one of the targets of said vid, I am hardly objective on the matter.

Oh, Superpowers... you've been added to my growing ignore list.


I'll add the link to adding him to your ignore list as a public service. He shouldn't be encouraged by people actually replying to his posts.

http://www.superherohype.com/forums/profile.php?do=addlist&userlist=ignore&u=35913
 
Kaboom said:
the belief and opinion presently seems to be that that you may be the one who created the video in question and seems to return every few weeks with a new alias preteding to be oblivious and then dropping it in there just to flaunt it.
You forgot to add the belief that he also needs serious mental help.
Honestly, as a health care professional, I feel sorry for him. We'll survive the stupid video, but he'll always need help.
 
Serene said:
You forgot to add the belief that he also needs serious mental help.
Honestly, as a health care professional, I feel sorry for him. We'll survive the stupid video, but he'll always need help.

Karmic payback is a *****.... he'll find out the hard way.

Because he shows no love or compassion for others, he'll get none for himself and he'll find it hard to live a happy life.

If I were in a more compassionate mood, I would feel sorry for him having a life like that but since he's made that bed, now he's going have to lie in it.
 
Kaboom said:
the belief and opinion presently seems to be that that you may be the one who created the video in question and seems to return every few weeks with a new alias preteding to be oblivious and then dropping it in there just to flaunt it.
So anyone who disagrees with your opinion must in fact be this guy with a new alias? Okay, gotcha.
 
no. thats not what i said. not my opinion. but there was no mention of the video until you added it into serenes post. that it was prompted the reaction.

talk about shooting the messenger.
 
LL2K2 said:
Give it time, folks - Tom will don the tights eventually. But if TPTB continue to write his Clark the way they did in the second half of last season (grief-stricken,

So I'm guessing that if he just got on with his life in the next episode after Reckoning, fans would have been screaming that this show has no damn continuity, people die and they forget about it.


I dont know what you were watching but the Clark I saw was a little shocked when he first saw Lex and Lana together, but he soon accepted it and gave them their space. It was Lex and Lana that kept throwing the jealousy anvils at Clark.

stalking,

Nope, no stalking. Chloe suggested that Lana might know where Lex's Evil Lab was, so Clark went to their dorm room to ask Lana the question. It was Lana, Lex and Lois that assumed he was stalking.

and not as mature as we think)...I don't know.

Maturity is all about perception. For a 19 year old, I find Smallville's Clark Kent very mature.
 
Serene said:
^ It really is disheartening for any Superman fan to see the franchise fail in its return to the big screen.
*sigh*

Glad we have SV to prove that the big guy can be a financial success. After all, it's all about the bottom-line.
SR was an amazing film,it just isn't doing good in the box office which is a very common tale.The biggest problem was WB releasing the film one week before what was the most anticipated film of the year.
 
griffolyon12 said:
SR was an amazing film,it just isn't doing good in the box office which is a very common tale.The biggest problem was WB releasing the film one week before what was the most anticipated film of the year.

I thought SR was the most anticipated film of the year.:rolleyes:
 
No, I think "Amazing" as in being able to make a two and a half hour movie with barely an hours worth of dialogue.:confused: :o

I mean c'mon, anyone could have played Kal Penns part, he didna have even one line.:down
 
Hmmm... I still haven't seen it.

Some dude at work (the same guy who I had an argument with about Tom's acting ability when his name came up) has seen it 7 times!

:eek:

I guess some people love it but they need to keep on seeing it if they're going to make their production and promotion budgets back...
 
When I saw it on Sunday, at my nearest biggest cinema complex, it had been relegated to the back theatres, which are small, and there were only 3 showings of it for the day.
 
Wow, what a unique, not explained, totally worthless, Kane post.:rolleyes:
 
Serene said:
Sucks snow? :confused:

I guess as long as it's not yellow.. that's okay. :D


yellow%20snow.jpg
 
I see that its 45 to 44 in favour of a Smallville movie. To those in favour I ask:

Does it not bother you that none of the actors or actress are good enough to carry a major movie picture? ( I know about O'Toole BTW, that movie was a disappointment)
 
Why should it bother anyone? It's your opinion, not fact.
 
MJD said:
Does it not bother you that none of the actors or actress are good enough to carry a major movie picture?
:confused:

Um... I think you've got it reversed. Shouldn't you be asking the dissenters that question? Here, lemme help...

Does it bother YOU that a $204M blockbuster film *about* Superman is apparently less popular with mass audiences than a popcorn film based on a Disney theme park ride, or a hackneyed comedy about working for a hard-nosed fashionista?

Does it bother YOU that the only film the TV show actor headlined made back its production budget at the domestic B.O. in NINE days, while a film directed by Bryan-X-Men-Singer can't seem to do the same without divine intervention?

Does it bother YOU that the actor who was chosen to headline the film can't act his way out of a phone booth, never less do a shirt rip in one?

Does it bother YOU that at least four names in the "no" list above (Hal Jordan 8472, Hollywoodland, Silver Lad and Vandal Savage) are the same person?
 
way to start the morning off swinging Pat.
 
MJD said:
I see that its 45 to 44 in favour of a Smallville movie. To those in favour I ask:

Does it not bother you that none of the actors or actress are good enough to carry a major movie picture? ( I know about O'Toole BTW, that movie was a disappointment)


does it not bother you that the people actually picked to act in the newest "Superman" film couldnt carry it either?

Or that the two "romantic leads" gave a performance in that film that makes the romantic leads on Smallville look like Hamlet and Ophelia?
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"