Sequels X4, spinoffs, or a begins movie?

would you rather see an x4-continuation of the series, really well done spin offs, like magneto, or wolveriene(which if done right, i am really looking forward to) or an xmen begins, where they go back and this time make a good effort at telling it the story right? i think its obvious the spin offs will be first, but out of an x4 or a an xmen re:dux, which would you rather see?

 

right, well im not even saying prequal really, because the first one techincally starts at the beginning so for a prequal we're talking like when scot and jean where like 16, no one wants to see that..but like, this is what i am thinking, i think these movies can be like the comics where there is the uncanny xmen, the ultimate xmen, etc etc...so we got bryan singers xmen, which i am not thrilled about but i do not like ultimate ether, and then we can have ratners xmen, then tarantinos xmen(just kidding haha that would rule though) but i think other writers and directors can take different approaches on there...i think they could like go back get the story right, like have angel cyclops(As the leader) jean grey, lora dane and beast, have bobby drake be the runaway that hides out with the xmen, have the likes of wolvierine, colossus nightcrawler, and storm join throughout the first act(obviously centering around wolvierine, because he will inevitabley be one of the stars) and maybe do a gambit thing just cause his time is well over due....and have the antagonists be the sentinals and magneto

 

correct, there are more characters to explore, but there are also numerous characters that they have screwed over in the process of making these movies, cyclops, storm, colossus, rouge and iceman most notiabley (now, im not talking about there exploreing rouge and icemnas relationships and stuff, i am talking about rouge working for mystique etc..and iceman potentially being one of the most powerfull mutants on earth but he is reckless, and lazy)

the problem isnt what they have done, it is what they have left undone in these movies, the singer ones in general

 

since many people are huge fans of these incorrect tellings of the best superhero team of all time, i always come off sounding like a huge dick, but the fact of the matter is, they are just not right...wolverine has mild recolection of his past, he should have recognized both sabertooth, and deathstrike as people he once worked with, he shouldn't have recognized stryker cause he never exsisted and they made him up for the movie...in the first movie they kill of both henry gyrich, and senetor kelly, who are both huge contributors to the xmen story, wolverine gets his ass kicked by mystique which should never happen...cyclops is a complete waste he should take more initiative, and not only use his powers when some one knocks his glasses off, a storm has none of her ever present african accent, nore do they mention her goddess like status in africa or her incounter with the shadow king, how her and professor xavier met....i just think for what they are these original movies are "neat" but they are nothing compared to the comics, which if they where, there is no reason they shouldn't be considered the best comic movies and not the spidermans

 

halley berry wont return, and recasting is always not a great idea just look at the original batmans, unless they could hit the good notes like bond franchinse has i would not like a recasting

 

good ups true beliver

 

who's gunna lead them if cyclops and jean die, and halley berry won't sign on to do storm?...and if the rumor that prof x dies there is no x4, they arent the xmen with out the x

 

i am excited for the wolverine movie, if done right, there is no reason that shouldn't kick ass, im sick of these movies, xmen didnt end on just three issues, but that is why i don't like these first two movies in general, why make up new stories for the xmen when there are like 5,000 stories to choose from, i would like to see them go back to the beginning and do it right

 

ok Xmaniac i will stop when i get tierd...the webbing in spider man compared to the fact that wolverine has gotten his ass handed to him by both mystique, and lady deathstrike, only to find some clevar way to beat them without actually beating them(i.e. sticking the adimantium liquid inside death strike) the comic book wolverine is a ninja trained murder machine who dosent even get his ass handed to him by the Hulk, let alone mystique and and deathstike, how come wolverine has no recolection of his history with deathstrike, and sabertooth, too huge parts of their rivalries, why does sabertooth suck and such a non villan, he was part of the same project, and is around the same stature of fighter wolverine is...where is the rogue mystique connection, rogue dosen't show up as an xmen until she took mrs. marvels powers after working with mystique, where is the connection in the movie Xmaniac? how come cyclops leads **** in the movies, he gives and order and no one follows, in the comics regardless of feelings for the most part they follow his lead...HENRY GYRICH AND SENATOR KELLY DIE IN THE FIRST MOVIE! they where huge parts of the mutant controll stuff and the sentinals and mastermold, what the hell, why kill off two very prominent story lines without giving ether of them very much screentime(alive anyways mystique kelly dosent count) Iceman is one of the very first Xmen, and so is angel, apparently they adress beast beinig an original in x3 so i will leave that out of it....there is no reason colossus shouldnt stay and fight in x2 in no way would he have been *****ed around in the comics, how come jean grey is totally not incontroll of her powers(dont give me the pheonix stuff because she certianly can controll her powers before then in the comics)...accents, pyro-austrailian, storm-african, colossus-siberian, toad british etc....i also don't ever seem to recall a william stryker being involved with the weapon x project, im alomst 100 percent sure that is false.....its attitudes like like xmanic that are responsible for the lack of any prominent stories out of the first two movies, granted they are hitting the right buttons on the 3rd with the pheonix, a brett rattner production mind you...i just think there is no reason the sentinals and the mutant controll agency shouldn't have been in one with that first magneto story where he turns the militaries weapons on each other, how much cooler is that then a story about rogue? 1000000times cooler, why isn't sinister or apacolypse or bishop and cable, gambit been in a xmovie yet, all are way more prominent characters and story lines them most of the stuff they have been doing, why don't we get to see cyclops and storms characters develop over the first two moives, i think its ludicris to belive these movie couldnt be ten times cooler, and you are a fool if you think other wise