L0ngsh0t said:
its the first mega anticipated hot ticket kid blockbuster of the summer( i doubt the davinci code will get the kids in the seats, and i think Mission impossible has alot of redeeming to do from the mi2 fiasco) it will make money, its only being made for like 100 million or so, i would be suprised if it dosent make that in a week, the movie will make money...as for the pleasing all 3 critcs fans and general audience...i ask another question, why can't it, you say you shouldn't be concernded with pleasing all three, why? the spidermans seem to have no problem doing that, batman begins made over 200 million so i think its safe to assume that covered all three, the lower budget hellboy did it for its little profile, blad suits all three, why can't we expect xmen to do the same, i think your only hurtting your movie going experience if you don't harp on it from the beginning...
p.s. incase anyone thinks from my rye comments about this series of movies that i in no way am not looking forward to x3 you are thinking wrong, i give the xmen movies the hardest time of all of the comic book movies cause i have been reading these comics since before i could read, they are my favorite heros and stories and villans of all time and i was incredibley dissapointed with the first, the second one kind of redeemed itself, but choosing such a non villan like stryker, and on top of everything making him in charge of weapon x, which he wasn't...i dunno sorry for the post comment rant i get carried away...i just really like these characters and stories and would like to see it done right
Part of my point is that the Box Office isn't as predictable as the analysts would like it to be. Although it would be unfair to say that X3 takes more risks than most films, in fact, tried and true franchises like this usually make the most money.
However..
Batman Begins did not do anywhere near as well as it should have or was expected to. This was not a movie that most of the general public enjoyed enough to commit to repeat viewings. In fact, the budget for the sequels was lowered considerably to meet profit projection.
In short. If BB had done as well as it was predicted to (and if an accurate budget had been released) then the BB sequels would have alot more money to play with.
Also, Blade did not please the critics. And as a result the film's profit margin suffered. The average movie-goer is more likely to see a movie that is 'spectacular, mind-blowing and a must see' rather than 'Stock standard action film with a few clever moments and some serious letdowns' - In short, better quality control may have meant more money for this film. Also, Like Hellboy, Blade does not pander to a general demographic. Actually, it is directed at young men 15-26, as a result it is not as profitable as other comic book films, but profitable enough to warrant sequels. (Also, Hellboy, as much as it got a lot of things right, was terribly edited) These films could not be regarded 'cash cows' like other comic franchises.
In a strange reversal, Fantastic Four met projections, except it was not universally accepted by critics or fans. In fact, alot of FF fans hated the movie. As a result, while it has made money, it has lost alot of it's core fan-base and that is not healthy for a developing franchise. But who knows? The Fantastic Four franchise may improve tenfold, or it may prove that the Studo Execs really know what we enjoy and that us movie-goers really don't know ****.
Spider-Man, like the previous X-Men, is the crown jewel of comic book movies in terms of universal sucess. The profit margin on Spider-Man 2 was considerable. And thus Spider-Man 3 is being treated as a pedigree because of the money it stands to bring to the studio.
X-Men 3 is similar. EXCEPT it may not meet the anticipated margin hoped for ny FOX. A sucessful X-Men movie is much harder to do than a sucessful spider-man film, mostly due to the fact that X-Men is an ensemble piece and harder to therefore harder to maintain, also the troubled pre-production has not helped.
As the X-Men franchise grows and it becomes even more difficult for the studio to meet the expectations of it's key demographics, and the cast and crew provide their own complications, Fox may begin to question exactly how valuable it is to their profit building enterprises.
I loved all the films above (except for possibly Fantastic Four, which I'm only partial too), but it IS important for blockbuster comic book films and especially the new X-Men films to have universal success. Film Genre's run in cycles, and there is a danger of the comic book film cycle quieting before us core fans are wholly satisfied. I repeat, IT IS important for the new X-Men film to have universal success, and, as the core fans, should we settle for anything else?
In short. It's not that X-Men: The Last Stand won't make 'lots of money'. It's exactly how much 'lots of money' it makes that is important if we want to see sequels.
In even shorter terms. If anyone who loves the franchise watches pirate copy of this film. I will hunt them and **** with their ******* **** **** those ****** *******.
In the shortest terms. I really, desperately hope this film is everything that myself, and everyone else, wants it to be. Beacuse, I love these movies.
