jaguarr said:Honestly, I blame the neo-cons for that. They infected the cultural rhetoric with the poisonous idea that not supporting the wars in the Middle East was the equivalent of not supporting the troops. It's completely ridiculous but the number of people that bought into that particular bit of snake oil is alarming.
jag
I think there's more to it than that though. I mean, some of the people who seemed to most accept it are those who are (and have been all along) most opposed the war. Rather than denying what neo-cons were saying and showing them to be wrong, they bought into it as well. That says to me there's something more going on.
I think we're still dealing with issues that go back to Viet Nam. I mean, a lot of the people in power today are men that served then and also people who were anti-war protesters who made that same leap on their own (i.e. you were bad if you were in the military, deserved to be shunned/spit on, etc. because you were in service of the administration - and these were men who didn't even necessarily choose to go, but were drafted).
I think there's still a strain of the idea that anyone who chooses to go into the military is a 'jack-booted thug' or just plain stupid (basically, the idea that serving in the media is a 'considerably-less-than-noble' persuit) remaining in some pockets of the far left that has been passed down to some college-aged kids.