2009 MLB Thread, part 2

Interesting stuff
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/blog_article/measuring-the-umpires-affect-on-the-game/

balls_and_strikes_thumb.jpg


Some of those strikes are way off lmao

It's like were studying a bunch of electrons and stuff lol.
As you can see, there is significant overlap. While umpires are pretty good at judging the high end of the strike zone, they are absolutely dreadful at judging the bottom and the sides, especially the third base side. Overall, 9.1% of pitches that were called balls were inside of the strike zone, and 21.7% of pitches that were called strikes were outside of the strike zone. I find that second figure outstanding, especially given that I am already giving the umps a pretty lenient strike zone.

now i see why you like the Broncos :cwink:

I never saw the Cardinals on TV growing up. It was always the AFC west with the Chargers, Broncos ect.

Hey hey now. Regardless of what the owner of my team chooses to call them, I do not actually live in LA. I feel that is an important distinction to make.

:oldrazz:

I learn something new everyday here.
 
So what team is the team of the decade?
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/playoffs/2009/columns/story?columnist=stark_jayson&id=4599154

Yankees, Red Sox, Phillies, Cardinals, Angels ???

Well, I think if the Yankees win...They become the team of the decade...If they lose the Series, as a Yankees fan let me say the Red Sox will be the team of the decade.

Yankees:
2000: Champs
2001: AL Champs
2002: AL East Champs
2003: AL Champs
2004: Division Champs
2005-2007: Made the playoffs winning the division twice
2009: AL Champs and *crossing fingers for more*

Red Sox:
2003: Made ALCS
2004: World Series Champs
2005: Made postseason
2006: Missed postseason
2007: World Series Champs
2008: Made ALCS
2009: Lost in DS
 
This question's not as easy as last decade where it was either Yanks or Braves, with Yanks winning out.

If the Yankees win out it's them because they will have been 2/4 this decade. If they don't win it gets harder because if the Phillies win they'll be against the Red Sox, and the Phillies will have gone back to back, So i'm conflicted with that.
 
The 2004 Red Sox are the team of the decade. Though I don't believe in this "team of the decade" nonsense.
 
okay I changed my mind. If the Yankees don't it'll be Boston because they've been to more LCS than the Phillies. But if the Yankees win they'll have won the same amount as Boston but will have been to more World Series.
 
This question's not as easy as last decade where it was either Yanks or Braves, with Yanks winning out.

If the Yankees win out it's them because they will have been 2/4 this decade. If they don't win it gets harder because if the Phillies win they'll be against the Red Sox, and the Phillies will have gone back to back, So i'm conflicted with that.

If the Yanks lose, then you have to go with the Sox. The pressure of winning one finally, beating the yanks the way they did in 2004 and going 8-0 in the World Series...Now this is only if the Yanks lose.
I hate the red sux.
 
The 2004 Red Sox are the team of the decade. Though I don't believe in this "team of the decade" nonsense.

Once again we disagree...This Yankees team will be the team of the decade if they beat the Phillies.
- Best record in Majors in 2009 (Division Champs)
- Shooting the rally monkey in the head (ALCS)
- Arguably the best infield in MLB history
- *Beating the champs of 2008
*If yankees win
 
The Red Sox broke their self-imposed "curse" and won with that amazing comeback in '04. That alone makes them the team of the decade.
 
Once again we disagree...This Yankees team will be the team of the decade if they beat the Phillies.
- Best record in Majors in 2009 (Division Champs)
- Shooting the rally monkey in the head (ALCS)
- Arguably the best infield in MLB history
- *Beating the champs of 2008
*If yankees win

Their record wasn't the best this decade. The Angels played poorly. Their IF isn't the best in ML history.

The Red Sox broke their self-imposed "curse" and won with that amazing comeback in '04. That alone makes them the team of the decade.

Exactly. No team was a bigger story than the 2004 Red Sox. What they did will never be done again. Even if it is, that Red Sox team will always be the one that did it first.
 
The fact that Jason Stark thinks this World Series decides the "team of the deacade" is laughable. As a Yankees fan, it should be the Red Sox regardless of what happens.
 
Well, it seems Go Web Go hasn't been on since the 22nd. He's the leader in the playoff pool. :o
 
1. Yankees 2. Phillies 3. Yankees 4. Phillies 5. Yankees 6. Yankees
 
Last edited:
:dry:

While some people like to keep the intimate details of their boudoir activities a secret, Kate Hudson and her BF, Alex Rodriguez, want to tell you all about it!
Us Weekly is claiming that the two lovebirds are OBSESSED with telling friends and family all about their WILD sex life!
What wonderful dinner conversation with your parents!
An insider close to the couple swears that: "They talk about it all day. Kate gets graphic about his body even to her parents."
 
don't hate the player, hate the game....he's got Kate Hudson to bang and Derek Jeter to grab his ass....is there really anything more?
 
don't hate the player, hate the game....he's got Kate Hudson to bang and Derek Jeter to grab his ass....is there really anything more?

Well, evidently all that sex with Kate Hudson has made him into a clutch hitter in the post-season. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. :word:
 
The Red Sox pretty much have to be the team of the decade, and I hate the Red Sox. The Phillies would only be the team of the decade if you ignored the years before 2007.

Best infield in major league history? That's a good one. It's not even the best infield of the decade.
 
Last edited:
He looks a lot sharper than Sabathia right now. Go Cliff Lee.
 
Whats with the rain in the bronx? Its not like this here in the city
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"