Cunning Stunts
#96
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,495
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Again, forcing overtime to be 10 minutes long - no matter what happens - is a huge loss for players and thus the game. Just like adding a 17th game, it's completely unfair to the players.
There is nothing wrong with the current OT as it stands. The only adjustment is that can take away the "it's decided by a coin flip!" argument (besides the fact it's not based on fact anyway) is taking away the second coin toss.
Uh, weren't people on every level of the NFL saying in the media that they'd agree to an extra game or two, stating that they don't need the last two preseason games?
I'm pretty sure the players, for the most part, don't find it "unfair". Especially if it'll give the middle-of-the-pack teams a better chance at competing for the playoffs.
And as far as OT goes, there's a lot wrong with it. This isn't a game of chance, it's a game of skill. The problem is, most teams that win the coin toss wind up winning the game. These are professionals- why the hell can't they have the same fair chance that college teams get in overtime? If you can win it with your offense, prove you can do the same with your defense. Plus, the fact that a simple field goal can decide the outcome of a game so abruptly is borderline idiotic.
Hell, at the very least, a fair chance would almost nullify all the talk about the ******** no-call on the facemask against Aaron Rodgers last night just as the game was being won.



It's only "********" when your team doesn't win.