A bunch of defensive minded role players without another offensive option able to create his own shot consistently. Who on that '01 Sixers team was a real threat to score on a night in, night out basis. Likewise, who on the Bulls has that ability?
Part of the reason Iverson fell off a cliff is because his game was predicated on speed, and getting to the basket. Once injuries, and age, caught up to him, he never developed the other skills to still impact the game in the same way he once did. And because of the lack of another scorer, I think it accelerated all those things happening. Derrick is going down the same path from my estimation.
Philadelphia had more defensive players though. The Bulls get by more on the fact that Thibs is able to come up with a quality defensive system and get everyone on the same page.
It's not because of the players or a perceived lack of scoring ability in the players they had which led to a lack of a number two option... It was the difficulty in plugging one of these guys in next to Alan Iverson.
It's not like they didn't have quality scorers there... they just dropped off the planet when they were there as Iverson ate ball and they were left with crumbs. He had a lot of players who were once considered great offensive threats until they wound up next to him.
Derrick Coleman, Toni Kukoc, Keith Van Horn, Glenn Robinson...
All guys who were looking like quality offensive options outside of when they had to play next to him. Hell Derrick Coleman had to go on to become a defensive specialist just to co-exist next to him because these volume guys don't see enough good quality ball next to him.
The 76ers really were the best produced example of a team that was built around the output of a single player and his own strengths and weaknesses. From the ground up. The best example. And they still couldn't win it all.
The Bulls meanwhile aren't produced with the sole intention of creating a team that can and will work around Rose. Not even close to being the same in that regard.
I wouldn't consider Carlos Boozer to be defensive minded wither... or Noah in the same ball-park as either Theo Ratliff in his 76ers days or Dikembe Mutombo...
Iverson had Eric Snow next to him because they needed a "point guard" with enough size to be able to cover 2s because of Iverson's lack of size... That meant they had pretty much two, maybe three, options for that role out of the scope of players back then. Jason Kidd, Eric Snow or maybe Gary payton... maybe.
They were built pretty much as the ideal to work around Iverson, and if he weren't on the team they'd have gone in completely different directions with GM decisions.
If Rose wasn't there I don't think they'd be making completely different decisions at all. They've got a far more solid base to their team, whilst the 76ers were pretty much all there (with the sole exception of the revolving door at small forward while they struggled in vain to find someone who could produce offensively as an option next to him) for how they complemented their star, and even at that small forward position the main determining factor when you think about it is how well they fit with him.