SoNicRaDiATioN
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,941
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I guess I agree, with most of your assessment. But as far as Shaq goes, it just bothers me that nobody ever tries to discredit him for never playing without another superstar perimeter player. Not just a good player, SUPERSTAR player. Ever. He never, ever was on a bad team without one and took them anywhere. Not once.
But with Shaq, it's ok. He's big, and goofy and tells jokes so it's fine. When people rate Kobe though, they view that as some sort of knock, or crutch. Besides the fact that they both averaged virtually the same amount of points during their run, the best player on the opposing team was almost always NOT a Center. Kobe, at that time, was also one of the best perimeter defenders, and when it came to the WCF, where the real NBA title was decided, Kobe annihilated the Spurs, Blazers & Kings. Every time.
On the flipside, although Jordan was a great defender himself, he also had the luxury of Scottie Pippen, who usually took the other team's best player. Just ask Magic Johnson about that. But for MJ, he "made" Pippen, lmao, and everybody else. It's borderline insane to suggest IMO, and more than a little disrespectful to a team that only lost one more game without him than they did with him, the first time he hung it up.
Agree with your points on Shaq. There's Penny, Kobe, Wade & Lebron. He's had superstars at every stop. Not to mention his pit stop in Beantown.
I do tire of the constant Jordan comparisons, I'll admit. Not just with Kobe but now with LeBron. And Pippen often gets short changed when Jordan's greatness is discussed, like your '91 finals reference. Being angry and sticking every little slight (or perceived slight) on your fridge door is not the only way a guy can be great. That tired old narrative has run it's course imo, and frankly it's getting boring. Really boring.