Days of Future Past Actors from original trilogy on First Class sequel with Days of Future Past - Part 1

[EnDz0n3]

I didn't say that was Jean

 

[marvelrobbins]

Agreed.

 

[JP]

I didn't say that was Jean

Oops, I misread. Haha. But there was a debate about that little girl being Jean some time ago.

 

[Matt Mortem]

For the reasons I already stated.

And Storm had a cameo, not Scott or Jean. People just assume the kid with black sunglasses is Scott, and the little Hispanic girl is Jean for no good reason at all.

Yep. It's easily dismissed as not being Scott. Storm was definitely there though.

 

[DigificWriter]

It ultimately doesn't matter if that little girl is or isn't Jean. We also shouldn't be taking into account Origins: Wolverine, as it has been, for all intents and purposes, declared non-canon.

 

[EnDz0n3]

Oops, I misread. Haha. But there was a debate about that little girl being Jean some time ago.

Haha no worries. I worded that weirdly too

People shouldn't be getting 'pissed off' by two minor cameos. That's just silly and looking to create issues that aren't really important.

I guess Cyclops, Storm and Jean not being "some of my [Xavier's] first students" is not that important.

I guess Havok being older than Scott isn't important either.

People complaining that this really isn't important should look at how casting is happening in DOFP. Had they included the original 3 as the first class, we wouldn't even have to question if any of the X-men (Banshee and Havok; other than Xavier and Beast) are returning in this film. We would already know they are bringing back the big 3.

 

[Angamb]

More like a cameo from 2 years ago

But you have to get where the fans are coming from though. Why use the obviously BS line that they can't use Cyclops, Storm (and Jean) as Original First Class X-men, and then show "2 second cameos" from obviously Cyclops and Storm especially when those two actors are pretty much the same ages as Havok and Banshee.

they dont care about consistency. dont waste your time trying to make them understand. They just dont understand.

All the decisions on FC were perfect, thats what we all should say. The users who said otherwise are just silly t:

 

[lordofthenerds]

People shouldn't be getting 'pissed off' by two minor cameos. That's just silly and looking to create issues that aren't really important.

Maybe not, but the filmmakers should not think that the fans will just accept an easter egg with open arms simply because it features two popular characters. It was a minor continuity error. When you're making a prequel to a popular film series, these errors will naturally irritate some fans.

 

[DigificWriter]

How does First Class invalidate Jean, Scott,and Ororoe being 'some of Xavier' s first students'?

It was repeatedly stated that Havok and Scott are not direct relatives in the X-Men filmic universe.

 

[EnDz0n3]

It was repeatedly stated that Havok and Scott are not direct relatives in the X-Men filmic universe.

 

[marvelrobbins]

It ultimately doesn't matter if that little girl is or isn't Jean. We also shouldn't be taking into account Origins: Wolverine, as it has been, for all intents and purposes, declared non-canon.

well at one time considering how first Class was made there was speculation
Last Stand was non-canon it's better to assume origins as cannon till they
give us otherwise.The bone claws In Origins for wolverine preadamanturm are at begining of the wolverine.And when asked the emma frost question Lauren Shueller Donnor said that wasn't emma In Oriigns not that Origins was outright
Ignored.

 

[Matt Mortem]

It was repeatedly stated that Havok and Scott are not direct relatives in the X-Men filmic universe.

Got a source for that claim????

 

[marvelrobbins]

How does First Class invalidate Jean, Scott,and Ororoe being 'some of Xavier' s first students'?

It was repeatedly stated that Havok and Scott are not direct relatives in the X-Men filmic universe.

It was stated they are related but not said exactly how.There was some
speculation they were using havok as Cyclops llon lost Older brother he didn't know about from Ultimate X-Men.

 

[EnDz0n3]

Got a source for that claim????

The source was an easter egg in the film that people chose to ignore j/k

 

[DigificWriter]

First Class itself does in fact provide the source for the idea that Alex and Scott are not directly related, but I also distinctly remember statements from the filmmakers supporting and indicating this as well. I can't remember exactly when or where these statements we're made, just that they were in fact made.

 

[Majik1387]

Love when posters make up bull****.

Nothing has ever been stated or insinuated that Scott and Alex aren't related. At most they just made Alex the older brother.

 

[lordofthenerds]

How does First Class invalidate Jean, Scott,and Ororoe being 'some of Xavier' s first students'?

Well if the school was set up in 1962, and Jean, Scott, and Ororoe didn't enroll until the 80s... then there would be students who joined before them for twenty-some years. Would this still constitute Jean, Scott, and Ororoe as some of his 'first students'? I'll let you decide.

Spoiler

But the answer is no.

 

[night0205]

Alright let me give you my thoughts on the X-men timeline. Many people disagree I guess, but it makes sense to me.

Magneto as early teen boy during WW2 - 1944
First Class (Cuban Missile Crisis) - 1962
Origins Wolverine (Three Mile Island Meltdown) - 1979
X-men, X2, The Last Stand (15 years, stated by Stryker, sense Three Mile Island) - 1994

The fact that the original trilogy doesn't give a specific date as to when it takes place but just says sometime in "future" gives me instinct that they didn't want to tie it down to when they made the film, but also wanted to give the audience the fantasy that this might happen in the future. I think the original x-men movies take place in 1990's. That pretty much clears up much of the ages of characters, also fits with the canon of the films.

 

[DigificWriter]

Love when posters make up bull****.

Nothing has ever been stated or insinuated that Scott and Alex aren't related. At most they just made Alex the older brother.

Let me prove you wrong, because I found one of the statements I referenced:

Statement from Bryan Singer talking about Havok and Cyclops
“It wouldn’t physically fit for him to be the brother of Cyclops. We take some liberties on that.

Here's a link to the article from which said statement was taken:
http://herocomplex.latimes.com/2011/02/10/x-men-first-class-bryan-singer-talks-about-azazel-havok-and-mystique/

 

[SpideyFan866]

nvm

 

[The_Shadow]

Don't mutants age slower than Humans though?

 

[SpideyFan866]

Don't mutants age slower than Humans though?

Not all mutants.

Many of them do, but most age like normal humans. It depends on their mutation.

 

[Angamb]

Let me prove you wrong, because I found one of the statements I referenced:


Here's a link to the article from which said statement was taken:
http://herocomplex.latimes.com/2011/02/10/x-men-first-class-bryan-singer-talks-about-azazel-havok-and-mystique/

there was another interview where he said they were related but in a different way or something like that

but if we we take that quote seriously, who the hell was that young boy on cerebro looking exactly like a young Scott?

they didnt have a ****ing clue about what they wanted with Alex and Scott around FC shoot. both were in the movie and then Singer says it wasnt possible, lol what a joke

 

[Matt Mortem]

Let me prove you wrong, because I found one of the statements I referenced:


Here's a link to the article from which said statement was taken:
http://herocomplex.latimes.com/2011/02/10/x-men-first-class-bryan-singer-talks-about-azazel-havok-and-mystique/

Singer can always change his mind. He didn't make it a concrete, undeniable fact in FC.

 

[Duran Man]

but if we we take that quote seriously, who the hell was that young boy on cerebro looking exactly like a young Scott?

Some kid with shades on.