Gu3ree
Sidekick
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2013
- Messages
- 1,647
- Reaction score
- 213
- Points
- 73
I take it you watched the Oscars this year.
thanks mate im 100% going to that!Literally walking distance, 'one of those follow the crowd scenario's'.
Guy on IMDb...
On Zack Snyder: It's his best by far.Take this from someone who has Watchmen on DVD.
On Cavill: Well i think it's a great improvment,that Cavill was the MPV and that Terrio's work is very obvious.Eisenberg and Afleck were both great.Make of that what you will.My review of MOS is among the replies btw.
Is there any reason to take this guy more seriously than anyone else?
He's a longtime poster with many previews attended on his side.Is there any reason to take this guy more seriously than anyone else?
I take it you watched the Oscars this year.
I take it you watched the Oscars this year.
Nah. But he didn't post any spoiler. Plus I have seen his previous mostly credible posts, additionally he had advertised the fact he was going to the screening days before.Is there any reason to take this guy more seriously than anyone else?
I hope this is real because I like what he's saying. It sounds like great story telling and superman has an arcHe ain;t posting spoilers just general thoughts and experience:
t:Nah. But he didn't post any spoiler. Plus I have seen his previous mostly credible posts, additionally he had advertised the fact he was going to the screening days before.
True enough, but this person had been to other screening in the past.Could just be a slick way to troll. Could be legit. I'll just wait 2 more weeks.
If John Stewart is the GL, then JL is over represented with African Americans as a percentage of American demographics by 2%. There needs to be more diversity but it shouldn't focus solely on African Americans.
And I hate getting involved, but there are many races and cultures that are actually under represented in film.
You already know he's talking founders lol. Why blitz him with B and C listers?
If John Stewart is the GL, then JL is over represented with African Americans as a percentage of American demographics by 2%. There needs to be more diversity but it shouldn't focus solely on African Americans.
And I hate getting involved, but there are many races and cultures that are actually under represented in film.
Lol at overrepresentation. That's a good thing. It means minorities are getting regular work. I want this for all minorities by the way. Gimme an Asian Hal Jordan. My body is ready.
If John Stewart is the GL, then JL is over represented with African Americans as a percentage of American demographics by 2%. There needs to be more diversity but it shouldn't focus solely on African Americans.
And I hate getting involved, but there are many races and cultures that are actually under represented in film.
![]()
Irons to play old Henry Cavill?![]()
I have to admit I always find it puzzling when people talk about "representation" when Hispanic/Latino Americans make up like 17% of the population, but people are angling for another black character with the argument of representation. It's odd that the same people shouting for representativity aren't calling for a Hispanic character, as they should be if adherence to the American demographic distribution is their main port of call.
The more I see the topic the more I realize it isn't about actual representation, it's about a black vs white spectrum.
You need to know how to filter out the fakes from the credible posters. This guy is quite credible. But don't take my words, just keep a healthy skepticism.Oh frickin heck, don't be taking IMDB message board posters seriously.
I have to admit I always find it puzzling when people talk about "representation" when Hispanic/Latino Americans make up like 17% of the population, but people are angling for another black character with the argument of representation. It's odd that the same people shouting for representativity aren't calling for a Hispanic character, as they should be if adherence to the American demographic distribution is their main port of call.
The more I see the topic the more I realize it isn't about actual representation, it's about a black vs white spectrum.
Except he explicitly stated where it's over-representation. One minority at the expense of another isn't a "good thing". And for whatever reason few people actually seem to be worried about representation rather than getting more black characters. There's a slightly worrying erasure of every other minority other than black when it comes to these discussions, not that I'm accusing you of it but it seems to be prevalent.